Face-to-face and telerehabilitation delivery of circuit training have similar benefits and acceptability in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a randomised trial

被引:6
|
作者
Aily, Jessica Bianca [1 ]
de Noronha, Marcos [2 ]
Selistre, Luiz Fernando Approbato [1 ]
Ferrari, Ricardo Jose [3 ]
White, Daniel Kent [4 ]
Mattiello, Stela Marcia [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Sao Carlos, Physiotherapy Dept, Sao Carlos, Brazil
[2] La Trobe Univ, Physiotherapy Dept, Bendigo, Australia
[3] Univ Fed Sao Carlos, Comp Dept, Sao Carlos, Brazil
[4] Univ Delaware, Dept Phys Therapy, Newark, NJ USA
关键词
Knee osteoarthritis; Circuit training; Randomised controlled trial; Telemedicine; Physical therapy; ULTRASOUND MEASUREMENTS; INTERMUSCULAR FAT; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; BEHAVIOR-CHANGE; HIP; STRENGTH; EXERCISE; PEOPLE; PERFORMANCE; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jphys.2023.08.014
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Question: Is periodised circuit training delivered via a telerehabilitation model of care as effective as the same training applied face-to-face for improving pain intensity, physical function, muscle strength, pain catastrophising, body composition, intermuscular adipose tissue and muscle architecture in people with knee osteoarthritis (OA)? Design: Randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial with concealed allocation, blinded assessors and intention-to-treat analysis. Participants: One hundred adults aged > 40 years with knee OA and pain for >= 3 months, with current pain >= 40 mm on a 10 0-mm visual analogue scale (VAS). Intervention: The experimental group received 14 weeks of circuit training delivered via telerehabilitation using video recordings, followed by periodic phone calls in order to motivate and instruct participants. The control group received the same circuit training program in a face-to-face format. Outcome measures: The primary outcomes were pain VAS and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) physical function subscale, measured at 14 weeks. Secondary outcomes included objective physical function, strength, pain catastrophising and morphological measures (muscle architecture and thigh and body composition). Outcomes were measured at 14 and 26 weeks. Results: Periodised circuit training delivered via telerehabilitation had equivalent effects to face-to-face delivery for pain intensity, physical function, muscle strength, pain catastrophising, thigh composition, intermuscular adipose tissue and muscle architecture. Whole body composition did not change appreciably in either group. Adherence to the training was excellent and participants in each group reported good perceptions of their randomised intervention. Conclusion: A periodised circuit training protocol can be delivered to people with knee OA in their own homes, using available technology while maintaining high levels of acceptability. More importantly, telerehabilitation appears to cause non-inferior physical and functional outcomes to face-to-face rehabilitation programs. Trial registration: RBR-662hn2. [Aily JB, de Noronha M, Approbato Selistre LF, Ferrari RJ, White DK, Mattiello SM (2023) Face-to-face and telerehabilitation delivery of circuit training have similar benefits and acceptability in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a randomised trial. Journal of Physiotherapy 69:232-239](c) 2023 Australian Physiotherapy Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:232 / 239
页数:8
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [1] Effects of a periodized circuit training protocol delivered by telerehabilitation compared to face-to-face method for knee osteoarthritis: a protocol for a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial
    Jéssica Bianca Aily
    Aline Castilho de Almeida
    Marcos de Noronha
    Stela Marcia Mattiello
    [J]. Trials, 22
  • [2] Effects of a periodized circuit training protocol delivered by telerehabilitation compared to face-to-face method for knee osteoarthritis: a protocol for a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial
    Aily, Jessica Bianca
    de Almeida, Aline Castilho
    de Noronha, Marcos
    Mattiello, Stela Marcia
    [J]. TRIALS, 2021, 22 (01)
  • [3] Comparison of Face-to-Face vs Digital Delivery of an Osteoarthritis Treatment Program for Hip or Knee Osteoarthritis
    Jonsson, Therese
    Dell'Isola, Andrea
    Lohmander, L. Stefan
    Wagner, Philippe
    Cronstrom, Anna
    [J]. JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2022, 5 (11) : E2240126
  • [4] Effectiveness and acceptability of face-to-face, blended and e-learning: a randomised trial of orthodontic undergraduates
    不详
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF DENTAL EDUCATION, 2011, 15 (02) : 110 - 117
  • [5] A COMPARISON OF FACE-TO-FACE AND DIGITAL DELIVERY OF FIRST-LINE INTERVENTION FOR PEOPLE WITH KNEE OR HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS
    Jonsson, T. S.
    Dell'Isola, A.
    Lohmander, S.
    Wagner, P.
    Cronstrom, A.
    [J]. OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2022, 30 : S192 - S192
  • [6] In-Home Telerehabilitation Compared with Face-to-Face Rehabilitation After Total Knee Arthroplasty A Noninferiority Randomized Controlled Trial
    Moffet, Helene
    Tousignant, Michel
    Nadeau, Sylvie
    Merette, Chantal
    Boissy, Patrick
    Corriveau, Helene
    Marquis, Francois
    Cabana, Francois
    Ranger, Pierre
    Belzile, Etienne L.
    Dimentberg, Ronald
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2015, 97A (14): : 1129 - 1141
  • [7] BLENDED PHYSICAL ACTIVITY INTERVENTION WITH REDUCED FACE-TO-FACE CONTACT AND USUAL PHYSICAL THERAPY SHOW SIMILAR EFFECTIVENESS IN PATIENTS WITH KNEE AND HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
    Kloek, C. J.
    Bossen, D.
    de Bakker, D. H.
    Dekker, J.
    Veenhof, C.
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2016, 75 : 827 - 828
  • [8] IS A PERIODIZED CIRCUIT TRAINING DELIVERED BY TELEREHABILITATION EFFECTIVE FOR PATIENTS WITH KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS? A PHASE I RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
    Aily, J.
    Castilho de Almeida, A.
    da Silva Ribeiro, G.
    de Noronha, M.
    Mattiello, S.
    [J]. OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2020, 28 : S468 - S469
  • [9] Technology versus tradition: a non-inferiority trial comparing video to face-to-face consultations with a physiotherapist for people with knee osteoarthritis. Protocol for the PEAK randomised controlled trial
    Hinman, Rana S.
    Kimp, Alexander J.
    Campbell, Penny K.
    Russell, Trevor
    Foster, Nadine E.
    Kasza, Jessica
    Harris, Anthony
    Bennell, Kim L.
    [J]. BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2020, 21 (01)
  • [10] Technology versus tradition: a non-inferiority trial comparing video to face-to-face consultations with a physiotherapist for people with knee osteoarthritis. Protocol for the PEAK randomised controlled trial
    Rana S. Hinman
    Alexander J. Kimp
    Penny K. Campbell
    Trevor Russell
    Nadine E. Foster
    Jessica Kasza
    Anthony Harris
    Kim L. Bennell
    [J]. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 21