Legal Framework for Biodiversity Conservation in Australia and New Zealand: A Comparative Analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Neil-Smith, Rose [1 ,2 ]
Naser, Mostafa Mahmud [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Edith Cowan Univ ECU, Perth, WA, Australia
[2] Pacer Legal Pty Ltd, Perth, WA, Australia
[3] Edith Cowan Univ ECU, Sch Business & Law, Perth, WA, Australia
[4] ECU, Ctr People Pl & Planet CPPP, Perth, WA, Australia
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Australia is one of the most biodiverse countries in the world and it is crucial that its biodiversity is sufficiently protected by law. This article argues that the current state of biodiversity protection in Australia's environmental law framework, which is primarily the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cth) (EPBC Act), is insufficient and efforts to reform such inadequacies must be made to recast the balance more sustainably in favour of the environment. Further, the article recognises New Zealand as having a suitable environmental law framework, through the Resource Management Act 1991 (NZ) (RMA), for comparative analysis with Australia and providing a model for effective biodiversity protection. Before conducting a comparative analysis of biodiversity conservation framework between Australia and New Zealand, this article provides an overview of Australia's national environmental law framework, specific to biodiversity protection, including a summary of the instrumental parts of the EPBC Act and a brief insight into its effectiveness. Then it provides a brief overview of New Zealand's national environmental law framework, specific to biodiversity protection by including the important aspects of the RMA and providing an initial assessment of the merits of their laws relative to Australia. Finally, in conclusion, this article recommends significant amendments to the EPBC Act to protect biodiversity and prevent drastic and irreversible damage from occurring from continuing biodiversity loss.
引用
收藏
页数:82
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Energy Efficiency: A Comparative Analysis of the New Zealand Legal Framework
    Eusterfeldhaus, Marcel
    Barton, Barry
    JOURNAL OF ENERGY & NATURAL RESOURCES LAW, 2011, 29 (04) : 431 - 470
  • [2] Comparative study of the international legal system of biodiversity conservation and the Iranian legal system of biodiversity conservation
    M. Homauoni
    M. Pournouri
    S. A. Poorhashemi
    D. Karimi
    International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 2019, 16 : 2503 - 2510
  • [3] Comparative study of the international legal system of biodiversity conservation and the Iranian legal system of biodiversity conservation
    Homauoni, M.
    Pournouri, M.
    Poorhashemi, S. A.
    Karimi, D.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 16 (05) : 2503 - 2510
  • [4] A comparative analysis of nature kindergarten programmes in Australia and New Zealand
    Masters, Jennifer
    Grogan, Leanne
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EARLY YEARS EDUCATION, 2018, 26 (03) : 233 - 248
  • [5] Legal Framework for Pontocaspian Biodiversity Conservation in the Danube Delta (Romania and Ukraine)
    Gogaladze, Aleksandre
    Biesmeijer, Jacobus C.
    Son, Mikhail O.
    Marushchak, Oleksii
    Wesselingh, Frank P.
    Lattuada, Matteo
    Sandu, Cristina
    Albrecht, Christian
    Mihailescu, Simona
    Raes, Niels
    FRONTIERS IN CONSERVATION SCIENCE, 2022, 3
  • [6] Regulating gender: legal histories of Australia and New Zealand
    Lake, Jessica
    Davidson, Clare
    HISTORY AUSTRALIA, 2024,
  • [7] The habous, a tool for biodiversity conservation? The case of Morocco in a comparative legal approach
    Idllalene, Samira
    DEVELOPPEMENT DURABLE & TERRITOIRES, 2013, 4 (01):
  • [9] Bryozoan biodiversity in the New Zealand region and implications for marine conservation
    A.A. Rowden
    R.M. Warwick
    D.P. Gordon
    Biodiversity & Conservation, 2004, 13 : 2695 - 2721
  • [10] Bryozoan biodiversity in the New Zealand region and implications for marine conservation
    Rowden, AA
    Warwick, RM
    Gordon, DP
    BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2004, 13 (14) : 2695 - 2721