Text, textual genre and types of discourse: revisiting key concepts from the perspective of Sociodiscursive Interactionism

In a national context, the fruitful contact of investigations with the theoretical-methodological framework of what is conventionally called the Geneva Group - to which theorists such as Bronckart (2006), Schneuwly and Dolz (1996, 1997) belong - occurred through the dissemination of studies of Sociodiscursive Interactionism (ISD), through the publication of Machado (1998) and, above all, the translation of Bronckart (1999). Indeed, of a theoretical nature, this article seeks to revisit important concepts of the analysis method and the model of organization of ISD texts, in order to systematize some of the contributions of epistemology and practice to the study of language, regarding , in particular, the perspectives of text, text genre and types of speeches. This study is anchored in principles of Applied Linguistics (MOITA LOPES, 2006), through interdisciplinary theoretical foundations, with emphasis on reflections on the following concepts: language acting, (BULEA, 2010; BRONCKART, 1999; 2008); text, textual architecture, types of discourse (BRONCKART, 2006; 2008; 2012) and text genre (BRONCKART, 1999; BRONCKART, 2005; BAKHTIN, 2011). In summary, the dynamism of Sociodiscursive Interactionism is inferred, understood as a developing process, whose main postulate is language seen as a central and decisive element for the so-called human science, the founding principle of the current.