Exponential information fractal dimension weighted risk priority number method for failure mode and effects analysis

被引:2
|
作者
Liu, Ruijie [1 ]
Li, Zhen [2 ]
Deng, Yong [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Elect Sci & Technol China, Inst Fundamental & Frontier Sci, Chengdu 610054, Peoples R China
[2] China Mobile Informat Technol Ctr, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China
[3] Vanderbilt Univ, Sch Med, Nashville, TN 37240 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA); Risk priority number (RPN); Information fractal dimension; Uncertainty; FMEA; TOPSIS;
D O I
10.1007/s10489-023-04912-x
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
As an efficient assessment technique, failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) plays a critical role in conducting risk analyses of production and decision-making. In FMEA, the determination of the risk priority number (RPN) is the most important stage used to prioritize potential failure modes. However, the elicited RPN oftentimes contains uncertainty. Information fractal dimension is a measure of uncertainty and complexity for probability distributions. Therefore, this paper aims to propose a novel exponential information fractal dimension weighted RPN (IFDRPN). Probability distributions of assessments are provided by experts. Then, the information fractal dimension is calculated with the consideration of the uncertainty of each piece of assessment information. Furthermore, the relative importance of experts based on variable backgrounds and authorities is also taken into consideration. The corresponding FMEA is capable of measuring uncertainty and complexity in opinions for failure modes to facilitate assessment. An application of rotor blades for an aircraft turbine, along with the risk assessment in hydropower finance project, are used to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed FMEA approach.
引用
收藏
页码:25058 / 25069
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Exponential information fractal dimension weighted risk priority number method for failure mode and effects analysis
    Ruijie Liu
    Zhen Li
    Yong Deng
    Applied Intelligence, 2023, 53 : 25058 - 25069
  • [2] Deng Entropy Weighted Risk Priority Number Model for Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
    Zheng, Haixia
    Tang, Yongchuan
    ENTROPY, 2020, 22 (03)
  • [3] AMWRPN: Ambiguity Measure Weighted Risk Priority Number Model for Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
    Tang, Yongchuan
    Zhou, Deyun
    Chan, Felix T. S.
    IEEE ACCESS, 2018, 6 : 27103 - 27110
  • [4] General model for the risk priority number in failure mode and effects analysis
    Kim, Kyungmee O.
    Zuo, Ming J.
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2018, 169 : 321 - 329
  • [5] Multiple failure modes analysis and weighted risk priority number evaluation in FMEA
    Xiao, Ningcong
    Huang, Hong-Zhong
    Li, Yanfeng
    He, Liping
    Jin, Tongdan
    ENGINEERING FAILURE ANALYSIS, 2011, 18 (04) : 1162 - 1170
  • [6] Revised Risk Priority Number in Failure Mode and Effects Analysis Model from the Perspective of Healthcare System
    Rezaei, Fatemeh
    Yarmohammadian, Mohmmad H.
    Haghshenas, Abbas
    Fallah, Ali
    Ferdosi, Masoud
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2018, 9
  • [7] Weighted Fuzzy Risk Priority Number Evaluation of Turbine and Compressor Blades Considering Failure Mode Correlations
    Gan, Luping
    Li, Yan-Feng
    Zhu, Shun-Peng
    Yang, Yuan-Jian
    Huang, Hong-Zhong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TURBO & JET-ENGINES, 2014, 31 (02) : 119 - 130
  • [8] A new method to evaluate risk in failure mode and effects analysis under fuzzy information
    Zhiming Huang
    Wen Jiang
    Yongchuan Tang
    Soft Computing, 2018, 22 : 4779 - 4787
  • [9] A new method to evaluate risk in failure mode and effects analysis under fuzzy information
    Huang, Zhiming
    Jiang, Wen
    Tang, Yongchuan
    SOFT COMPUTING, 2018, 22 (14) : 4779 - 4787
  • [10] A Modified Method for Risk Evaluation in Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
    Shi, Jun-Li
    Wang, Ya-Jun
    Jin, Hai-Hua
    Fan, Shuang-Jiao
    Ma, Qin-Yi
    Zhou, Mao-Jun
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2016, 19 (02): : 177 - 186