Definitions of "Cure" After Low-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy in Low- and Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer: Phoenix or Surgical?

被引:0
|
作者
Boehle, Andreas [1 ,2 ]
Zywietz, Dorothea [1 ]
Robrahn-Nitschke, Irina [4 ]
Koenig, Inke R. [3 ]
Lusch, Achim [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lubeck, Dept Urol, Lubeck, Germany
[2] HELIOS Agnes Karll Hosp Bad Schwartau, Bad Schwartau, Germany
[3] Univ Lubeck, Inst Med Biometry & Stat, Lubeck, Germany
[4] CURAVID Radiol & Radiotherapy, Lubeck, Germany
关键词
ESTRO-SIOG GUIDELINES; LOCAL TREATMENT; DIAGNOSIS; ANTIGEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.adro.2022.101112
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare a surgical with a Phoenix-derived definition of cure at 4 years after treatment by 125J low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) in patients with low-and intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Methods and Materials: A total of 427 evaluable men with low-risk (62.8%) and intermediate-risk (37.2%) prostate cancer were treated with LDR-BT (160 Gy). Cure was defined at 4 years either as not having experienced a biochemical recurrence by the Phoenix definition, or by a surgical definition, using a posttreatment prostate-specific antigen of & LE;0.2 ng/mL. Biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), and cancer-specific survival were calculated at 5 and 10 years using the Kaplan-Meier method. Standard diagnostic test evaluations were used to compare both definitions with regard to later metastatic failure or cancer -specific death. Results: At 48 months, 427 patients were evaluable with a Phoenix-defined and 327 with a surgical-defined cure. At 5 and 10 years BRFS was 97.4% and 89% and MFS was 99.5% and 96.3% in the Phoenix-defined cure cohort, and BRFS was 98.2% and 92.7% and MFS was 100% and 99.4% in the surgical-defined cure cohort. Specificity for cure was 100% for both definitions. Sensitivity was 97.4% for the Phoenix and 96.3% for the surgical definition. The positive predictive value was 100% for both, whereas the negative predictive value was 29% for the Phoenix and 7.7% for the surgical definition. Accuracies of a correct prediction of cure were 94.8% and 96.3% for the Phoenix and the surgical definition, respectively. Conclusions: Both definitions are useful for a reliable assessment of cure after LDR-BT in patients with low-risk and intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Cured patients might follow a less stringent follow-up schedule from 4 years onward, whereas patients not achieving cure at 4 years should be monitored for an extended time. (C) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Society for Radiation Oncology.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Focal low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy for low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer
    Kunogi, Hiroaki
    Wakumoto, Yoshiaki
    Kawamoto, Terufumi
    Oshima, Masaki
    Horie, Shigeo
    Sasai, Keisuke
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY BRACHYTHERAPY, 2020, 12 (06) : 554 - 561
  • [2] Low-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy Versus Cryotherapy in Low- and Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer
    Gestaut, Matthew M.
    Cai, Wendi
    Vyas, Shilpa
    Patel, Belur J.
    Hasan, Salman A.
    MunozMaldonado, Yolanda
    Deb, Niloyjyoti
    Swanson, Gregory
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2017, 98 (01): : 101 - 107
  • [3] Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer Treated With Definitive Low-dose-rate Brachytherapy
    Ester, E. C.
    Wang, X.
    Vernon, M. R.
    Olson, N. J.
    Shanley, R. M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 84 (03): : S405 - S405
  • [4] Low-dose rate brachytherapy for patients with low- or intermediate-risk prostate cancer: A systematic review
    Rodrigues, George
    Yao, Xiaomei
    Loblaw, D. Andrew
    Brundage, Michael
    Chin, Joseph L.
    [J]. CUAJ-CANADIAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2013, 7 (11-12): : 463 - 470
  • [5] Effect of Positive Biopsy Core Rate on Low-dose-rate Brachytherapy Outcomes in Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer
    Kusuhara, Yoshito
    Fukawa, Tomoya
    Fukumori, Tomoharu
    Ueno, Yoshiteru
    Daizumoto, Kei
    Sasaki, Yutaro
    Tomida, Ryotaro
    Yamamoto, Yasuyo
    Yamaguchi, Kunihisa
    Tonoiso, Chisato
    Kubo, Akiko
    Kawanaka, Takashi
    Furutani, Shunsuke
    Ikushima, Hitoshi
    Kanayama, Hiro-omi
    Takahashi, Masayuki
    [J]. ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2023, 43 (10) : 4627 - 4635
  • [6] Patterns of Recurrence After Low-Dose-Rate Prostate Brachytherapy: A Population-Based Study of 2223 Consecutive Low- and Intermediate-Risk Patients
    Lo, Andrea C.
    Morris, W. James
    Pickles, Tom
    Keyes, Mira
    McKenzie, Michael
    Tyldesley, Scott
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2015, 91 (04): : 745 - 751
  • [7] A comparative analysis between low-dose-rate brachytherapy and external beam radiation therapy for low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer in Asian men
    Li, Youquan
    Ngai, Thomas Chan Kong
    Zhou, Siqin
    Hwong, Jerome Yap Haw
    Ping, Eric Pang Pei
    Li Kuan, Ashley Ong
    Chek, Michael Wang Lian
    Kiang, Melvin Chua Lee
    Looi, Wen Shen
    Nei, Wen Long
    Chua, Eu Tiong
    On, Weber Lau Kam
    Kiat, Terence Tan Wee
    Peng, John Yuen Shyi
    Loong, Jeffrey Tuan Kit
    [J]. ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2021, 60 (10) : 1291 - 1295
  • [8] LOW-DOSE-RATE BRACHYTHERAPY FOR LOW- AND INTERMEDIATE-RISK PROSTATE CANCER: A DOSE-RESPONSE ANALYSIS FOR 3392 CONSECUTIVE 125-IODINE MONOTHERAPY PATIENTS
    Morris, W. James
    Spadinger, Ingrid
    Halperin, Ross
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2016, 120 : S28 - S28
  • [9] RADIATION DOSE PREDICTS FOR BIOCHEMICAL CONTROL IN INTERMEDIATE-RISK PROSTATE CANCER PATIENTS TREATED WITH LOW-DOSE-RATE BRACHYTHERAPY
    Ho, Alice Y.
    Burri, Ryan J.
    Cesaretti, Jamie A.
    Stone, Nelson N.
    Stock, Richard G.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2009, 75 (01): : 16 - 22
  • [10] Do androgen deprivation and the biologically equivalent dose matter in low-dose-rate brachytherapy for intermediate-risk prostate cancer?
    Tabata, Ryuji
    Kimura, Takahiro
    Kuruma, Hidetoshi
    Sasaki, Hiroshi
    Kido, Masahito
    Miki, Kenta
    Takahashi, Hiroyuki
    Aoki, Manabu
    Egawa, Shin
    [J]. CANCER MEDICINE, 2016, 5 (09): : 2314 - 2322