Disclosure Speed: Evidence from Nonpublic SEC Investigations

被引:5
|
作者
Blackburne, Terrence P. [1 ]
Quinn, Phillip J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Oregon State Univ, Coll Business, Dept Accounting, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Michael G Foster Sch Business, Dept Accounting, Seattle, WA USA
来源
ACCOUNTING REVIEW | 2023年 / 98卷 / 01期
关键词
SEC investigations; private information; litigation risk; external monitors; disclosure; managerial entrenchment; CEO turnover; SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION; VOLUNTARY DISCLOSURE; INFORMATION; NEWS; FIRM; OWNERSHIP; MANAGERS; EARNINGS; COSTS; FRAUD;
D O I
10.2308/TAR-2019-0407
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We examine cross-sectional variation in disclosure speed by using data that allow us to measure when managers learn of SEC investigations and the time lag until subsequent disclosures. We document that external monitoring and litigation risk are associated with 99 percent and 39 percent faster disclosure, and managerial entrenchment with 28 percent slower disclosure. When revelations by external parties preempt managers' disclosures, we observe a significant increase in bid-ask spreads that persists for at least three years following the close of the investigation and a higher likelihood of turnover for less entrenched CEOs. We also document that firms whose managers disclose investigations are subject to fewer subsequent securities class action lawsuits. Our results are consistent with managers balancing the costs of fast disclosure, including immediate stock price declines and potential reputational costs, with the risks of having external parties leak news of SEC investigations.
引用
收藏
页码:55 / 82
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Spillover Effect of SEC Comment Letters on Qualitative Corporate Disclosure: Evidence from the Risk Factor Disclosure
    Brown, Stephen V.
    Tian, Xiaoli
    Tucker, Jennifer Wu
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2018, 35 (02) : 622 - 656
  • [2] Determinants of Disclosure Noncompliance and the Effect of the SEC Review: Evidence from the 2006 Mandated Compensation Disclosure Regulations
    Robinson, John R.
    Xue, Yanfeng
    Yu, Yong
    [J]. ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2011, 86 (04): : 1415 - 1444
  • [3] Economic consequences of SEC disclosure regulation: evidence from the OTC bulletin board
    Bushee, BJ
    Leuz, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 2005, 39 (02): : 233 - 264
  • [4] Auditor Style and Common Disclosure Issues: Evidence from SEC Comment Letters
    Baugh, Matthew D.
    Schmardebeck, Roy
    [J]. ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2023, 98 (05): : 61 - 97
  • [5] Is "Not Guilty" the Same as "Innocent"? Evidence from SEC Financial Fraud Investigations
    Solomon, David H.
    Soltes, Eugene
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL LEGAL STUDIES, 2021, 18 (02) : 287 - 327
  • [6] Evidence of regulatory noncompliance with SEC disclosure rules on auditor changes
    Schwartz, KB
    Soo, BS
    [J]. ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 1996, 71 (04): : 555 - 572
  • [7] SEC VIEWPOINT AS TO DISCLOSURE
    FEUERSTEIN, DM
    [J]. BUSINESS LAWYER, 1970, 25 (02): : 813 - 823
  • [8] THE SEC AND CORPORATE DISCLOSURE
    GRIENENBERGER, WF
    SOMMER, AA
    GREENE, EF
    WILSON, JL
    KRIPKE, H
    PARKER, CR
    [J]. BUSINESS LAWYER, 1980, 36 (01): : 119 - 157
  • [9] SEC AND NEW DISCLOSURE
    STEVENSON, RB
    [J]. CORNELL LAW REVIEW, 1976, 62 (01) : 50 - 93
  • [10] SEC DISCLOSURE PRACTICE
    STEINBERG, MI
    [J]. SECURITIES REGULATION LAW JOURNAL, 1987, 15 (03): : 318 - 324