The Australian Centaur State and the Post-Pandemic Economic Recovery

被引:1
|
作者
Papadopoulos, Angelika [1 ]
O'Keeffe, Patrick [1 ]
机构
[1] RMIT Univ, Social & Global Studies Ctr, Sch Global Urban & Social Studies, Melbourne, Vic 3000, Australia
来源
ECONOMIC AND LABOUR RELATIONS REVIEW | 2023年 / 34卷 / 01期
关键词
COVID-19; meaningful work; social welfare policy; work futures; I38; P16; H53;
D O I
10.1017/elr.2022.9
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This article uses Loic Wacquant's concept of the centaur state to analyse symbolic framings of the meaning and future of work in the Australian policy response to COVID-19 in 2020. In contrast with historical conceptualisations anchored in rights and social security, contemporary Australian social welfare policy discourse is dominated by political representations of the imperative to work. For people currently outside of the labour market, self-reliance through paid work is a primary objective of social security policy. In 2020, economic impacts of national lockdowns were ameliorated by large transfers from the state to businesses and individuals. Concurrent announcements of plans for a 'business-led' post-pandemic economic recovery centred the message that the meaning of work lies in its individual and social utility. Prior to the pandemic, transformation of the modes of organisation of work had already brought into question normative claims about the meaning of work, and what is comprehended by the term 'job'. Analysis of key 'economic recovery' policy initiatives illustrates that they combined considerable corporate welfare with a construction of job seekers as having unrealistic expectations of meaningful work, for which there could be no room in the institutional machinery driving economic recovery. In the policy trajectory of the Australian centaur state, the future of work for people currently unemployed is to serve as a resource to fuel the business-led recovery.
引用
收藏
页码:104 / 117
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Innovative Technology for Post-Pandemic Economic Recovery
    Berawi, Mohammed Ali
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 12 (01): : 1 - 4
  • [2] BC exploration thriving in the post-pandemic economic recovery
    Thompson, Iain
    [J]. Canadian Mining Journal, 2022, 143 (04)
  • [3] Population health post-pandemic: critiquing the economic approach to recovery
    Shipton, Debs
    McCartney, Gerry
    McMaster, Robert
    [J]. PUBLIC HEALTH IN PRACTICE, 2021, 2
  • [4] RCEP:Injecting Strong Impetus into Post-Pandemic Economic Recovery
    ZHOU MI
    [J]. China Today, 2022, (02) : 42 - 44
  • [5] Science policy frameworks for a post-pandemic green economic recovery
    Zachariadis, Theodoros
    Giannakis, Elias
    Taliotis, Constantinos
    Karmellos, Marios
    Fylaktos, Nestor
    Howells, Mark
    Blyth, Will
    Hallegatte, Stephane
    [J]. ENERGY STRATEGY REVIEWS, 2023, 45
  • [6] Post-Pandemic Recovery of the Global Economy
    Smirnov, E. N.
    [J]. MGIMO REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS, 2021, 14 (02): : 47 - 71
  • [8] Latin America post-pandemic: debt, financial instability, and uneven economic recovery
    Aparicio, Daniel
    Rivera, Gabriela
    Meireles, Monika
    [J]. ECONOMIC ISSUES, 2023, 28 : 5 - 19
  • [9] Post-Pandemic Recovery: The Russian Economy and the Transition to Sustainable Social and Economic Development
    Aganbegyan A.G.
    Klepach A.N.
    Porfiryev B.N.
    Uzyakov M.N.
    Shirov A.A.
    [J]. Studies on Russian Economic Development, 2020, 31 (6) : 599 - 605
  • [10] Post-pandemic recovery through landscape restoration
    Dhyani, Shalini
    Bhaskar, Dhanya
    Santhanam, Harini
    Murthy, Indu K.
    [J]. RESTORATION ECOLOGY, 2022, 30 (05)