Evaluation of groundwater potential, aquifer parameters and vulnerability using geoelectrical method: a case study of parts of the Sanaga Maritime Division, Douala, Cameroon

被引:3
|
作者
Mbinkong, Raymond Soweh [1 ]
Kengni, Serge Hugues Pokam [1 ]
Ndoh, Ndikum Eric [2 ,3 ]
Gaetan, Tepoule Dongmo Narcisse [4 ]
Pokam, Blaise Pascal Gounou [4 ]
Tabod, Charles Tabod [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bamenda, Fac Sci, Dept Phys, Bamenda, Cameroon
[2] Univ Bamenda, Higher Teacher Training Coll HTTC, Dept Phys, Bamenda, Cameroon
[3] Univ Bamenda, Higher Tech Teacher Training Coll HTTTC Bambili, Dept Fundamental Sci, Bamenda, Cameroon
[4] Univ Yaounde I, Fac Sci, Dept Phys, Yaounde, Cameroon
关键词
Sanaga maritime; Aquifer; VES; Resistivity; Groundwater potential; AKWA IBOM STATE; U-PB; CONGO CRATON; NIGERIA; TRANSMISSIVITY; REGION; NORTH; BELT;
D O I
10.1007/s40808-023-01932-x
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A geoelectric survey was carried out in parts of the Sanaga maritime division where the limited quality of surface water sources, insufficient geophysical knowledge and a growing population have had a significant impact on the assessment and development of groundwater in the area. Forty-six vertical electrical soundings (VES) involving the Schlumberger electrode configuration were carried out across the study area to assess the groundwater potential and vulnerability which will assist in the proper siting of wells/boreholes. The VES survey was carried out using the ABEM SAS 1000 instrument with a maximum current electrode spread (AB/2) of 120 m. Field data obtained were curve-matched and iterated using the JOINTEM software to estimate groundwater repositories. The modelling results revealed three to five geoelectric layers including the topsoil, laterite, weathered formation, cracked gneiss and gneiss. VES curves obtained included the A, AA, H, HA, HK, HKH, KH, KHK, and QH. A correlation between borehole logs and the VES lithology was made and is in agreement. The aquifer unit was identified at the third and fourth geoelectric layers with thickness and resistivity ranging from 18 to 47 m and 93-16500 ohm m, respectively. The evaluated aquifer parameters (longitudinal conductance, transverse resistance, hydraulic conductivity, transmissivity, reflection coefficient and fracture contrast) ranged: 0.0026 to 0.28 mhos, 1981 to 702,405 ohm m(2), 0.05 to 5.67 m/day, 2-150 m(2)/day, -0.67 to 0.93, and 0.19 to 29, respectively. Contour maps were drawn from the estimated aquifer parameters to show their distribution in the study area, from which groundwater potential areas were delineated. The distribution of longitudinal conductance showed poor to moderate protective capacity throughout the study area. The findings of this study hold significant value as a reference for guiding groundwater exploration and development activities in the study area.
引用
收藏
页码:2833 / 2853
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of groundwater potential, aquifer parameters and vulnerability using geoelectrical method: a case study of parts of the Sanaga Maritime Division, Douala, Cameroon
    Raymond Soweh Mbinkong
    Serge Hugues Pokam Kengni
    Ndikum Eric Ndoh
    Tepoule Dongmo Narcisse Gaetan
    Blaise Pascal Gounou Pokam
    Charles Tabod Tabod
    Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 2024, 10 : 2833 - 2853
  • [2] Assessment of groundwater vulnerability using a specific vulnerability method: Case of Maritime Djeffara shallow aquifer (Southeastern Tunisia)
    Ayed, Bachaer
    Jmal, Ikram
    Sahal, Samir
    Bouri, Salem
    ARABIAN JOURNAL OF GEOSCIENCES, 2017, 10 (12)
  • [3] Assessment of groundwater vulnerability using a specific vulnerability method: Case of Maritime Djeffara shallow aquifer (Southeastern Tunisia)
    Bachaer Ayed
    Ikram Jmal
    Samir Sahal
    Salem Bouri
    Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2017, 10
  • [4] Geoelectrical and hydrochemical assessment of groundwater contamination risks: a case study of aquifer vulnerability in Mansehra, Pakistan
    Abrar Niaz
    Shahina Tariq
    Ahmer Bilal
    Shengtang Zhang
    Li Yang
    Rashida Fiaz
    Jawad Niaz
    Carbonates and Evaporites, 2025, 40 (2)
  • [5] Identification groundwater aquifer by using geoelectrical method: case study Pondok Pesantren Darussallam, Kradenan, Grobogan
    Legowo, B.
    Darsono
    Putra, A. G.
    Kurniawan, M. F. R.
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MATHEMATICS, SCIENCE AND EDUCATION 2017 (ICMSE2017), 2018, 983
  • [6] Evaluation of aquifer vulnerability to contamination potential using the DRASTIC method
    Al-Zabet, T
    ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY, 2002, 43 (1-2): : 203 - 208
  • [7] Determination of groundwater vulnerability in karstic environments by using SINTACS method: Altinova aquifer case study
    Amil, Aysenur
    Cil, Ahmet
    Avci, Pinar
    Muhammetoglu, Ayse
    Ozyurt, Naciye Nur
    PAMUKKALE UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING SCIENCES-PAMUKKALE UNIVERSITESI MUHENDISLIK BILIMLERI DERGISI, 2020, 26 (03): : 559 - 571
  • [8] Geophysical investigation of groundwater potential, aquifer parameters, and vulnerability: a case study of Enugu State College of Education (Technical)
    Oguama, Bethrand Ekwundu
    Ibuot, Johnson Cletus
    Obiora, Daniel Nnaemeka
    Aka, Mfoniso Udofia
    MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS AND ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 5 (03) : 1123 - 1133
  • [9] Geophysical investigation of groundwater potential, aquifer parameters, and vulnerability: a case study of Enugu State College of Education (Technical)
    Bethrand Ekwundu Oguama
    Johnson Cletus Ibuot
    Daniel Nnaemeka Obiora
    Mfoniso Udofia Aka
    Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 2019, 5 : 1123 - 1133
  • [10] Groundwater vulnerability mapping using the Susceptibility Index (SI) method: Case study of Takelsa aquifer, Northeastern Tunisia
    Ghouili, Nesrine
    Jarraya-Horriche, Faten
    Hamzaoui-Azaza, Fadoua
    Zaghrarni, Mohamed Faouzi
    Ribeiro, Luis
    Zammouri, Mounira
    JOURNAL OF AFRICAN EARTH SCIENCES, 2021, 173