A Comparative Assessment of Primary Implant Stability Using Osseodensification vs. Conventional Drilling Methods: A Systematic Review

被引:3
|
作者
Althobaiti, Abdulrahman K. [1 ]
Ashour, Abdulrahman W. [1 ]
Halteet, Firas A. [1 ]
Alghamdi, Sulaiman I. [1 ]
Aboshetaih, Mohamed M. [2 ]
Al-Hayazi, Ali Mosa [3 ]
Saaduddin, Ahmed M. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Batterjee Med Coll, Dent Program, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
[2] Dakahlia Governorate, Minist Hlth, Dental Sect, Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Mansoura, Egypt
[3] Suliman Habter Dent Ctr, Dent, Abha, Saudi Arabia
[4] Mansoura Univ, Fac Dent, Oral & Maxillofacial Surg Dept, Mansoura, Egypt
[5] Batterjee Med Coll, Dept Clin Dent Sci, Dent Program, Div Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
关键词
primary implant stability; isq; insertion torque; osseointegration; bone density; resonance frequency analysis; osseodensification; implant stability quotient; densah bur; conventional drilling; BONE-DENSITY;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.46841
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Osseodensification is a novel biomechanical bone preparation technique that has been established to replace conventional bone drilling and therefore will optimize the implant site. The purpose of this systematic review was to compare the implant stability obtained by osseodensification drilling to those associated with conventional drilling techniques. An electronic search was performed in the PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Cochrane Oral Health Group, and Dentistry and Oral Science Source databases searched through Elton B. Stephens Company (EBSCO) for potentially relevant publications in the English language from January 2013 to December 2022. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and non-randomized studies of interventions (NRSIs), contrasting osseodensification drilling with conventional drilling, studies documenting implant stability quotient (ISQ), and studies reporting the immediate outcome and at least three months of follow-up after dental implant placement were included. Two independent investigators evaluated the quality of the reviewed studies to determine the risk of bias using the version 2 of Cochrane risk-of-bias (RoB) tool for RCTs (RoB 2) and RoB for NRSIs (ROBINS-I). Majority of the studies showed that bone density was significantly higher in the osseodensification group. The overall RoB for the NRSIs was reported to be low with respect to confounding, selection, classification, incomplete data, deviance from interventions, outcome evaluation, and selective reporting. The quality assessment of the RCT studies included in the review using the RoB 2 tool showed a high overall risk. The findings of the current review reveal that osseodensification drilling exhibited higher resonance frequency analysis (RFA) and ISQ values than conventional drilling protocols. Similarly, when osseodensification regions were contrasted with traditional drilling, bone density at the implant surface was augmented.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparative evaluation of osseodensification drilling versus conventional drilling technique on dental implant stability: A systematic review
    Banerjee, Saurav
    Dasgupta, Dolanchanpa
    Parasrampuria, Nikita
    Pal, Dipankar
    Gandhi, Udey Vir
    JOURNAL OF INDIAN PROSTHODONTIC SOCIETY, 2024, 24 (03): : 225 - 232
  • [2] Implant Stability of Osseodensification Drilling Versus Conventional Surgical Technique: A Systematic Review
    Gaspar, Joao
    Proenca, Luis
    Botelho, Joao
    Machado, Vanessa
    Chambrone, Leandro
    Neiva, Rodrigo
    Mendes, Jose Joao
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2021, 36 (06) : 1104 - 1110
  • [3] The Effectiveness of Osseodensification Drilling versus the Conventional Surgical Technique on Implant Stability: A Clinical Trial
    Pereira, Joao Fontes
    Costa, Rosana
    Vasques, Miguel Nunes
    Relvas, Marta
    Braga, Ana Cristina
    Salazar, Filomena
    da Camara, Marco Infante
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (10)
  • [4] Osseodensification: An Alternative to Conventional Osteotomy in Implant Site Preparation: A Systematic Review
    Pereira, Joao Fontes
    Costa, Rosana
    Vasques, Miguel Nunes
    Salazar, Filomena
    Mendes, Jose Manuel
    da Camara, Marco Infante
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (22)
  • [5] Primary stability with osseodensification drilling of dental implants in the posterior maxilla region in humans: A systematic review
    Fereno-Caceres, Alejandro
    Velez-Astudillo, Romulo
    Bravo-Torres, Wilson
    Astudillo-Rubio, Daniela
    Alvarado-Cordero, Jacinto
    DENTAL AND MEDICAL PROBLEMS, 2024, 61 (04) : 605 - 612
  • [6] Comparative Evaluation of Osseodensification Versus Conventional Osteotomy Technique on Dental Implant Primary Stability: An Ex Vivo Study
    Bandela, Vinod
    Shetty, Neema
    Munagapati, Bharathi
    Basany, Ram B.
    Kanaparthi, Saraswathi
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (10)
  • [7] Piezoelectric vs. conventional implant site preparation: ex vivo implant primary stability
    Baker, Justin A.
    Vora, Shweta
    Bairam, Latifa
    Kim, Hyeong-il
    Davis, Elaine L.
    Andreana, Sebastiano
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2012, 23 (04) : 433 - 437
  • [8] Assessment of Primary Stability of Dental Implants Placed in Narrow Ridges Using Osseodensification Drilling Technique
    Manodh, Pedamally
    Madhav, P.
    Deepanjali, Megarasu
    Manikandhan, Ramanathan
    Prasad, Tangutur Srinivasa
    JOURNAL OF MAXILLOFACIAL & ORAL SURGERY, 2024,
  • [9] COMPARING THE EFFICACY OF OSSEODENSIFICATION OVER CONVENTIONAL DRILLING TECHNIQUE ON IMPLANT STABILITY AND BONE DENSITY IN LOW BONE DENSITY SITES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Shilpi, Shraddha
    Bansal, Monika
    Khairnar, Mahesh
    Su, Gokila Vani
    Akram, Zainab
    Rashika, M.
    Agarwal, Sakshi
    JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE-BASED DENTAL PRACTICE, 2025, 25 (02)
  • [10] Osseodensification Drilling vs. Standard Protocol of Implant Site Preparation: An In Vitro Study on Polyurethane Foam Sheets
    Comuzzi, Luca
    Tumedei, Margherita
    Piattelli, Adriano
    Iezzi, Giovanna
    PROSTHESIS, 2020, 2 (02): : 76 - 86