Standard Endoscopic Mucosal Resection vs Precutting Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Using Novel Disk-Tip Snare for Colorectal Lesions

被引:3
|
作者
Yoshida, Naohisa [1 ]
Inoue, Ken [1 ]
Hashimoto, Hikaru [1 ]
Kobayashi, Reo [1 ]
Tomita, Yuri [1 ]
Sugino, Satoshi [1 ]
Hirose, Ryohei [1 ]
Dohi, Osamu [1 ]
Morinaga, Yukiko [2 ]
Inada, Yutaka [3 ]
Murakami, Takaaki [4 ]
Itoh, Yoshito [1 ]
机构
[1] Kyoto Prefectural Univ Med, Grad Sch Med Sci, Dept Mol Gastroenterol & Hepatol, 465 Kajii cho,Kamigyo ku, Kyoto 6028566, Japan
[2] Kyoto Prefectural Univ Med, Grad Sch Med Sci, Dept Surg Pathol, Kyoto, Japan
[3] Kyoto First Red Cross Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Kyoto, Japan
[4] Aiseikai Yamashina Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Kyoto, Japan
关键词
Precutting EMR; Colorectal lesions; Polyps; Adenoma; SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION; MULTIFUNCTIONAL SNARE; MANAGEMENT; POLYPS; TUMORS; FEASIBILITY; UNDERWATER; INCISION; SOCIETY; EMR;
D O I
10.1007/s10620-023-07833-4
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
IntroductionSOUTEN (KANEKA Co., Tokyo, Japan) is a unique snare with a disk tip. We analyzed the efficacy of precutting endoscopic mucosal resection with SOUTEN (PEMR-S) for colorectal lesions.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 57 lesions of 10-30 mm treated with PEMR-S at our institution from 2017 to 2022. The indications were lesions that were difficult for standard EMR due to size, morphology, and poor elevation by injection. Various therapeutic results of PEMR-S such as en bloc resection, procedure time, and perioperative hemorrhage were analyzed, and the results of 20 lesions of 20-30 mm with PEMR-S were compared to those of lesions with standard EMR (2012-2014) using propensity score matching. Additionally, the stability of the SOUTEN disk tip was analyzed in a laboratory experiment.ResultsThe polyp size was 16.5 +/- 4.2 mm and the non-polypoid morphology rate was 80.7%. Histopathological diagnosis included 10 sessile-serrated lesions, 43 low-grade and high-grade dysplasias, and 4 T1 cancers. After matching, the en bloc resection and histopathological complete resection rates of lesions of 20-30 mm between PEMR-S and standard EMR (90.0% vs. 58.1%, p = 0.03 and 70.0% vs. 45.0%, p = 0.11). The procedure time (min) was 14.8 +/- 9.7 and 9.7 +/- 8.3 (p < 0.01). The en bloc resection (%) and procedure time of expert/non-expert were 89.7/85.7 (p = 0.96) and 6.1 +/- 2.2/18.5 +/- 7.2 (p < 0.01). The perioperative bleeding and hemostasis success rates with SOUTEN were 43.9% and 96.0%. In the experiment, the SOUTEN disk tip was fixed stably compared to other EMR snares.ConclusionsPEMR-S achieved high en bloc resection of colorectal lesions of 20-30 mm though it leaded to long procedure time.
引用
收藏
页码:2030 / 2039
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Standard Endoscopic Mucosal Resection vs Precutting Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Using Novel Disk-Tip Snare for Colorectal Lesions
    Naohisa Yoshida
    Ken Inoue
    Hikaru Hashimoto
    Reo Kobayashi
    Yuri Tomita
    Satoshi Sugino
    Ryohei Hirose
    Osamu Dohi
    Yukiko Morinaga
    Yutaka Inada
    Takaaki Murakami
    Yoshito Itoh
    [J]. Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 2023, 68 : 2030 - 2039
  • [3] Deep Cuts: Colonic Polyp Resection Using Standard Endoscopic Mucosal Resection vs. Precutting Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Using a Novel Disk Tip Snare
    Dhruvil Radadiya
    [J]. Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 2023, 68 : 1663 - 1664
  • [4] Precutting endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal lesions
    Tamai, Naoto
    Kamba, Shunsuke
    Sumiyama, Kazuki
    [J]. DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY, 2017, 29 : 66 - 67
  • [5] Efficacy of precutting endoscopic mucosal resection with full or partial circumferential incision using a snare tip for difficult colorectal lesions
    Yoshida, Naohisa
    Inoue, Ken
    Dohil, Osamu
    Yasuda, Ritsu
    Hirose, Ryohei
    Naito, Yuji
    Murakami, Takaaki
    Ogiso, Kiyoshi
    Inada, Yutaka
    Inagaki, Yoshikazu
    Morinaga, Yukiko
    Kishimoto, Mitsuo
    Itoh, Yoshito
    [J]. ENDOSCOPY, 2019, 51 (09) : 871 - 876
  • [6] Endoscopic treatment of large colorectal tumors: comparison of endoscopic mucosal resection, endoscopic mucosal resection–precutting, and endoscopic submucosal dissection
    Eun-Jung Lee
    Jae Bum Lee
    Suk Hee Lee
    Eui Gon Youk
    [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2012, 26 : 2220 - 2230
  • [7] Endoscopic treatment of large colorectal tumors: comparison of endoscopic mucosal resection, endoscopic mucosal resection-precutting, and endoscopic submucosal dissection
    Lee, Eun-Jung
    Lee, Jae Bum
    Lee, Suk Hee
    Youk, Eui Gon
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2012, 26 (08): : 2220 - 2230
  • [8] Endoscopic mucosal resection-precutting vs conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for sessile colorectal polyps sized 10-20 mm
    Zhang, Xue-Qun
    Sang, Jian-Zhong
    Xu, Lei
    Mao, Xin-Li
    Li, Bo
    Zhu, Wan-Lin
    Yang, Xiao-Yun
    Yu, Chao-Hui
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2022, 28 (45) : 6397 - 6409
  • [9] Endoscopic mucosal resection-precutting vs conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for sessile colorectal polyps sized 10-20 mm
    Xue-Qun Zhang
    Jian-Zhong Sang
    Lei Xu
    Xin-Li Mao
    Bo Li
    Wan-Lin Zhu
    Xiao-Yun Yang
    Chao-Hui Yu
    [J]. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2022, 28 (45) : 6397 - 6409
  • [10] Endoscopic Mucosal Resection and Endoscopic Piecemeal Mucosal Resection for Colorectal Neoplasia
    Saitoh, Yusuke
    Fujiya, Mikihiro
    Watari, Jiro
    [J]. NEW CHALLENGES IN GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2008, : 346 - +