Surgical Site Infection Prevention A Review

被引:126
|
作者
Seidelman, Jessica L. [1 ]
Mantyh, Christopher R. [2 ]
Anderson, Deverick J. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ Sch Med, Duke Ctr Antimicrobial Stewardship & Infect Preven, Durham, NC USA
[2] Duke Univ Sch Med, Dept Surg, Durham, NC USA
[3] Box 102359, Durham, NC 27710 USA
来源
关键词
PROSTHETIC JOINT INFECTION; STAPHYLOCOCCUS-AUREUS; SAFETY CHECKLIST; RISK-FACTOR; ANTIMICROBIAL-PROPHYLAXIS; CARDIOTHORACIC SURGERY; COLORECTAL SURGERY; WOUND-INFECTION; UNITED-STATES; CONTAMINATION;
D O I
10.1001/jama.2022.24075
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
ImportanceApproximately 0.5% to 3% of patients undergoing surgery will experience infection at or adjacent to the surgical incision site. Compared with patients undergoing surgery who do not have a surgical site infection, those with a surgical site infection are hospitalized approximately 7 to 11 days longer.ObservationsMost surgical site infections can be prevented if appropriate strategies are implemented. These infections are typically caused when bacteria from the patient's endogenous flora are inoculated into the surgical site at the time of surgery. Development of an infection depends on various factors such as the health of the patient's immune system, presence of foreign material, degree of bacterial wound contamination, and use of antibiotic prophylaxis. Although numerous strategies are recommended by international organizations to decrease surgical site infection, only 6 general strategies are supported by randomized trials. Interventions that are associated with lower rates of infection include avoiding razors for hair removal (4.4% with razors vs 2.5% with clippers); decolonization with intranasal antistaphylococcal agents and antistaphylococcal skin antiseptics for high-risk procedures (0.8% with decolonization vs 2% without); use of chlorhexidine gluconate and alcohol-based skin preparation (4.0% with chlorhexidine gluconate plus alcohol vs 6.5% with povidone iodine plus alcohol); maintaining normothermia with active warming such as warmed intravenous fluids, skin warming, and warm forced air to keep the body temperature warmer than 36 degrees C (4.7% with active warming vs 13% without); perioperative glycemic control (9.4% with glucose 150 mg/dL); and use of negative pressure wound therapy (9.7% with vs 15% without). Guidelines recommend appropriate dosing, timing, and choice of preoperative parenteral antimicrobial prophylaxis.Conclusions and RelevanceSurgical site infections affect approximately 0.5% to 3% of patients undergoing surgery and are associated with longer hospital stays than patients with no surgical site infections. Avoiding razors for hair removal, maintaining normothermia, use of chlorhexidine gluconate plus alcohol-based skin preparation agents, decolonization with intranasal antistaphylococcal agents and antistaphylococcal skin antiseptics for high-risk procedures, controlling for perioperative glucose concentrations, and using negative pressure wound therapy can reduce the rate of surgical site infections.
引用
收藏
页码:244 / 252
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prevention of Infection at the Surgical Site
    Fry, Donald E.
    [J]. SURGICAL INFECTIONS, 2017, 18 (04) : 377 - 378
  • [2] Prevention of Surgical Site Infection
    Kirby, John P.
    Mazuski, John E.
    [J]. SURGICAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2009, 89 (02) : 365 - +
  • [3] Care Bundles in Surgical Site Infection Prevention: A Narrative Review
    Ching, Patrick R.
    [J]. CURRENT INFECTIOUS DISEASE REPORTS, 2024, 26 (06) : 163 - 172
  • [4] Skin Preparation for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection: A Scoping Review
    Garzon, Mauricio Medina
    Casteno Plata, Maria Camila
    Moreno Herrera, Cristhian Camilo
    [J]. REVISTA CUIDARTE, 2021, 12 (02)
  • [5] Surgical Site Infection in Colorectal Surgery: A Review of the Nonpharmacologic Tools of Prevention
    Murray, Bryce W.
    Huerta, Sergio
    Dineen, Sean
    Anthony, Thomas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2010, 211 (06) : 812 - 822
  • [6] Perspectives in Prevention and Treatment of Surgical Site Infection - A Narrative Review of the Literature
    Leaper, David
    Fry, Donald
    Assadian, Ojan
    [J]. WOUNDS-A COMPENDIUM OF CLINICAL RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2013, 25 (11): : 313 - 323
  • [8] The economic benefits of surgical site infection prevention in adults: a systematic review
    McFarland, A.
    Reilly, J.
    Manoukian, S.
    Mason, H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 2020, 106 (01) : 76 - 101
  • [9] Progress in the prevention of surgical site infection
    Casey, Anna L.
    Elliott, Tom S. J.
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2009, 22 (04) : 370 - 375
  • [10] Dressings for the prevention of surgical site infection
    Dumville, Jo C.
    Gray, Trish A.
    Walter, Catherine J.
    Sharp, Catherine A.
    Page, Tamara
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2014, (09):