Combined Robotic Ventral Mesh Rectopexy and Sacrocolpopexy for Multicompartmental Pelvic Organ Prolapse

被引:5
|
作者
Devane, Liam A. [1 ]
Ranson, Stacy M. [1 ]
Bustamante-Lopez, Leonardo Alfonso [1 ]
Uwah, Martin Sunday [1 ]
Kudish, Bela [2 ]
Kow, Nathan [2 ]
Hoff, John J. [1 ]
Monson, John R. T. [1 ]
deBeche-Adams, Teresa C. H. [1 ]
机构
[1] AdventHlth Med Grp Colorectal Surg, Surg Hlth Outcomes Consortium SHOC, 2415 North Orange Ave,Off 102, Orlando, FL 32804 USA
[2] AdventHlth Orlando, Female Pelv Med & Reconstruct Surg, Orlando, FL USA
关键词
Robotic ventral mesh rectopexy; Sacrocolpopexy; Short-term outcomes; Tricompartmental pelvic organ prolapse; WOMEN; FLOOR; RECURRENCE; PREVALENCE; RISK;
D O I
10.1097/DCR.0000000000003013
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Multispecialty management should be the preferred approach for the treatment of pelvic floor dysfunction because there is often multicompartmental prolapse. Objective: To assess the safety of combined robotic ventral mesh rectopexy and either uterine or vaginal fixation for the treatment of multicompartmental pelvic organ prolapse at our institution. Design: Retrospective analysis. Settings: Tertiary referral academic center. Patients: All patients who underwent a robotic approach and combined procedure and whose cases were discussed at a biweekly pelvic floor multidisciplinary team meeting. Main outcome measures: Operative time, intraoperative blood loss and complications, postoperative pelvic organ prolapse quantification score, length of stay, 30-day morbidity, and readmission. Results: From 2018 to 2021, there were 321 operations for patients with multicompartmental prolapse. The mean age was 63.4 years. The predominant pelvic floor dysfunction was rectal prolapse in 170 cases (60%). Pelvic organ prolapse quantification scores were II in 146 patients (53%), III in 121 patients (44%), and IV in 9 patients (3%); 315 of 323 cases included robotic ventral mesh rectopexy (98%). Sacrocolpopexy or sacrohysteropexy was performed in 281 patients (89%). Other procedures included 175 hysterectomies (54%), 104 oophorectomies (32%), 151 sling procedures (47%), 149 posterior repairs (46%), and 138 cystocele repairs (43%). The operative time for ventral mesh rectopexy was 211 minutes and for combined pelvic floor reconstruction was 266 minutes. Average length of stay was 1.6 days. Eight patients were readmitted within 30 days: 1 with a severe headache and 7 with postoperative complications (2.5%), such as pelvic collection and perirectal collection, both requiring radiologic drainage. Four complications required reoperation: epidural abscess, small-bowel obstruction, missed enterotomy requiring resection, and urinary retention requiring sling revision. There were no mortalities.
引用
收藏
页码:286 / 290
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] ROBOTIC SACROCOLPOPEXY WITH VENTRAL RECTOPEXY FOR MULTICOMPARTMENT PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE
    Stewart, Carrie
    Moradzadeh, Ariel
    Moore, Beth
    Anger, Jennifer
    Eilber, Karyn
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 201 (04): : E1207 - E1207
  • [2] A TECHNIQUE FOR COMBINED ROBOTIC SACROCOLPOPEXY AND VENTRAL MESH RECTOPEXY
    Stair, Sabrina L.
    Kaplan, Jennifer
    Simianu, Vlad
    Lee, Una
    Palmer, Cristina
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 211 (05): : E101 - E102
  • [3] Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy plus ventral rectopexy as combined treatment for multicompartment pelvic organ prolapse
    Campagna, G.
    Panico, G.
    Caramazza, D.
    Anchora, L. P.
    Parello, A.
    Gallucci, V
    Vacca, L.
    Scambia, G.
    Ercoli, A.
    Ratto, C.
    [J]. TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2020, 24 (06) : 573 - 584
  • [4] Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy plus ventral rectopexy as combined treatment for multicompartment pelvic organ prolapse
    G. Campagna
    G. Panico
    D. Caramazza
    L. P. Anchora
    A. Parello
    V. Gallucci
    L. Vacca
    G. Scambia
    A. Ercoli
    C. Ratto
    [J]. Techniques in Coloproctology, 2020, 24 : 573 - 584
  • [5] Robotic Ventral Mesh Rectopexy and Sacrocolpopexy
    Brady, Justin T.
    Kow, Nathan
    deBeche-Adams, Teresa
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2022, 65 (01) : E16 - E17
  • [6] Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy plus ventral rectopexy for multicompartment pelvic organ prolapse
    G. Campagna
    G. Panico
    D. Caramazza
    V. Gallucci
    S. Pizzacalla
    A. Ercoli
    G. Scambia
    A. Parello
    C. Ratto
    [J]. Techniques in Coloproctology, 2019, 23 : 179 - 181
  • [7] Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy plus ventral rectopexy for multicompartment pelvic organ prolapse
    Campagna, G.
    Panico, G.
    Caramazza, D.
    Gallucci, V.
    Pizzacalla, S.
    Ercoli, A.
    Scambia, G.
    Parello, A.
    Ratto, C.
    [J]. TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2019, 23 (02) : 179 - 181
  • [8] Combined rectopexy and sacrocolpopexy is safe for correction of pelvic organ prolapse
    Cristina B. Geltzeiler
    Elisa H. Birnbaum
    Matthew L. Silviera
    Matthew G. Mutch
    Joel Vetter
    Paul E. Wise
    Steven R. Hunt
    Sean C. Glasgow
    [J]. International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2018, 33 : 1453 - 1459
  • [9] COMBINED RECTOPEXY AND SACROCOLPOPEXY IS SAFE FOR CORRECTION OF PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE
    Geltzeiler, C.
    Silviera, M.
    Vetter, J.
    Mutch, M.
    Wise, P.
    Hunt, S.
    Birnbaum, E.
    Glasgow, S.
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2017, 60 (06) : E277 - E278
  • [10] Combined rectopexy and sacrocolpopexy is safe for correction of pelvic organ prolapse
    Geltzeiler, Cristina B.
    Birnbaum, Elisa H.
    Silviera, Matthew L.
    Mutch, Matthew G.
    Vetter, Joel
    Wise, Paul E.
    Hunt, Steven R.
    Glasgow, Sean C.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2018, 33 (10) : 1453 - 1459