Effect of different finishing and polishing procedures on surface roughness and microbial adhesion on highly-filled composites for injectable mold technique

被引:6
|
作者
Vulovic, Stefan [1 ,6 ]
Stasic, Jovana N. [2 ]
Ilic, Jugoslav [3 ]
Todorovic, Milos [4 ]
Jevremovic, Danimir [5 ]
Milic-Lemic, Aleksandra [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Belgrade, Sch Dent Med, Dept Prosthodont, Belgrade, Serbia
[2] Univ Belgrade, Sch Dent Med, DentalNet Res Grp, Belgrade, Serbia
[3] Univ Belgrade, Sch Dent Med, Dept Restorat Odontol & Endodont, Belgrade, Serbia
[4] Univ Belgrade, Sch Dent Med, Dept Pediat & Prevent Dent, Belgrade, Serbia
[5] Univ Business Acad, Sch Dent, Pancevo, Serbia
[6] Univ Belgrade, Sch Dent Med, Dept Prosthodont, Rankeova 4, Belgrade 11000, Serbia
关键词
CFU; flowable composites; injectable technique; MTT; SEM; surface roughness; VITRO BIOFILM FORMATION; RESIN-BASED COMPOSITES; STREPTOCOCCUS-MUTANS; BACTERIAL ADHESION; SYSTEMS; GLOSS;
D O I
10.1111/jerd.13045
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the effect of different finishing and polishing procedures on surface roughness and microbial adhesion and viability of Streptococcus mutans on novel highly-filled composites for injectable mold technique. Materials and Methods: One hundred sixty specimens were divided into four material groups: FSF (Filtek Supreme Flowable Restorative), TE (Tetric EvoFlow), GUI (Gaenial Universal Injectable) and GUF (G-aenial Universal Flo). Within each group, specimens were split regarding finishing and polishing (F/P) procedures into: SLD (Sof-Lex Discs), SLS (Sof-Lex Spirals), OG (OneGloss) and PG (PoGo). Surface roughness was analyzed using profilometer (Ra and Rz) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and Strep. mutans biofilm formation was analyzed using colony forming unit (CFU) and cell viability assay. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey's post hoc test were used for comparison among groups, Pearson's coefficient was applied for the correlation between Ra and CFU/ml and all data were presented as mean +/- SD. Results: Both materials and F/P procedures affect Ra, Rz and Strep. mutans CFU/ml values (p = 0.05). Considering the Ra and Rz, GUI and GUF revealed lower values, compared to FSF and TE and SLD and SLS revealed lower values, compared to OG and PG. Considering the Strep. mutans CFU/ml and viability, GUI and TE presented lower values, compared to GUF and FSF and SLD and SLS presented lower values, compared to OG and PG. Moderate positive correlation was found between Ra and CFU/ml (r = 0.552). Conclusions: The smoothest surfaces possess GUI and GUF, among materials and SLD and SLS, among F/P procedures. GUI adhered the lowest amount of Strep. mutans, due to the smoothest surfaces. FSF and GUF revealed the highest amount of Strep. mutans, due to bis-GMA, bis-MEPP and TEGDMA in their composition. Clinical Significance: The findings of the present study may be beneficial for the proper selection of highly-filled composites and an adequate finishing and polishing procedure when performing the injectable mold composite resin veneer technique.
引用
收藏
页码:917 / 926
页数:10
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] Effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of packable composites
    Roeder, LB
    Tate, WH
    Powers, JM
    OPERATIVE DENTISTRY, 2000, 25 (06) : 534 - 543
  • [2] Surface roughness of resin composites after finishing and polishing procedures
    Marsola, FP
    Nagem, H
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2002, 81 : A338 - A338
  • [3] Effect of the different finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of three different posterior composite resins
    Sahbaz, Cafer
    Bahsi, Emrullah
    Ince, Bayram
    Bakir, Elif Pinar
    Cellik, Omer
    SCANNING, 2016, 38 (05) : 448 - 454
  • [4] Effect of finishing and polishing procedures on surface roughness, gloss and color of resin-based composites
    Paravina, RD
    Roeder, L
    Lu, H
    Vogel, K
    Powers, JM
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2004, 17 (04): : 262 - 266
  • [5] Effect of Finishing and Polishing on The Surface Roughness of Bulk Fill Composites
    Aljamhan, Abdullah
    Habib, Syed Rashid
    AlSarhan, Mohammed A.
    AlZahrani, Bashayer
    AlOtaibi, Hessa
    AlSunaidi, Norah
    OPEN DENTISTRY JOURNAL, 2021, 15 : 25 - 32
  • [6] Effect of Finishing/Polishing Systems on the Surface Roughness of Novel Posterior Composites
    Marghalani, Hanadi Y.
    JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC AND RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2010, 22 (02) : 127 - 138
  • [7] EVALUATION OF SURFACE ROUGHNESS OF DENTAL COMPOSITES SUBJECT TO DIFFERENT METHODS OF FINISHING AND POLISHING
    Rios, Mariana
    Araujo, Filipe
    Marques, Tiago
    Oliveira, Filipe
    Vaz, Mario
    Correia, Andre
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MECHANICS AND MATERIALS IN DESIGN (M2D2017), 2017, : 1785 - 1786
  • [8] Comparison of different finishing/polishing systems on surface roughness and gloss of resin composites
    Antonson, Sibel A.
    Yazici, A. Ruya
    Kilinc, Evren
    Antonson, Donald E.
    Hardigan, Patrick C.
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2011, 39 : E9 - E17
  • [9] SURFACE-ROUGHNESS OF A MICROFILLED ANTERIOR AND A HIGHLY-FILLED POSTERIOR COMPOSITE RESIN FOLLOWING VARIOUS FINISHING TECHNIQUES
    PRATTEN, DH
    JOHNSON, GH
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1986, 65 : 345 - 345
  • [10] Effect finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of IPS Empress 2 ceramic
    Capelozza Boaventura, Juliana Maria
    Nishida, Rodrigo
    Elossais, Andre Afif
    Lima, Darlon Martins
    Santos Nunes Reis, Jose Mauricio
    Campos, Edson Alves
    de Andrade, Marcelo Ferrarezi
    ACTA ODONTOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2013, 71 (3-4) : 438 - 443