A chemotaxonomic analysis of terpenes variation in Metasequoia glyptostroboides and Sequoiadendron giganteum resins

被引:4
|
作者
Malhocka, Alexandra [1 ]
Svabova, Martina [1 ]
机构
[1] CAS, Inst Rock Struct & Mech, V Holesovickach 94-41, Prague 8, Czech Republic
关键词
GC/MS; Chemotaxonomy; Metasequoia glyptostroboides; Resin; Sequoiadendron giganteum; Terpenes; LEAF ESSENTIAL OIL; CHEMICAL-COMPOSITION; EXTRACTS;
D O I
10.1080/0972060X.2023.2280139
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
To determine whether the terpene composition of the resins of Metasequoia and Sequoiadendron genera is useful for chemotaxonomic discrimination, extracts of resins from trunks, needles, and female cones were analysed by gas chromatography. High levels of alpha-pinene and trace amounts of sesqui- and diterpenes were typical for resins from trunks and needles of M. glyptostroboides. Resins from cones contained also a higher level of (E)-beta-caryophyllene. In resins of S. giganteum, the levels of monoterpenes and diterpenes were nearly balanced. The resins from cones were an exception: 14-isopropylpodocarpa-8,11,13-trien-13-ol predominates noticeably over alpha-pinene. Using cluster analysis of the terpenes from needle resins, a distinct proximity of Sequoiadendron from USA and Metasequoia from Japan and Sequoiadendron from France and Metasequoia from the Czech Republic was proven. This proximity was caused by the presence of the monoterpene a-pinene in a very high quantity. On the contrary, great differences among S. giganteum growing in Corsica, Croatia, and the Czech Republic were caused by the presence of high levels of different terpenes such as elemicin, safrole, and 14-isopropylpodocarpa-8,11,13-trien-13-ol, each of them being detected only in a single study. The results therefore indicated that there is a proximity between Metasequoia and Sequoiadendron genera but only in some populations.
引用
收藏
页码:1245 / 1255
页数:11
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] LACK OF INCORPORATION OF TRITIATED URIDINE BY NUCLEI OF MATURE SIEVE ELEMENTS IN METASEQUOIA-GLYPTOSTROBOIDES AND SEQUOIADENDRON-GIGANTEUM
    HEBANT, C
    PLANTA, 1975, 126 (02) : 161 - 163
  • [2] Variation of cuticle micromorphology of Metasequoia glyptostroboides (Taxodiaceae)
    Leng, Q
    Yang, H
    Yang, Q
    Zhou, JP
    BOTANICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY, 2001, 136 (02) : 207 - 219
  • [3] Updated dendrochronology and axial variation of climatic sensitivity in Sequoiadendron giganteum
    Carroll, Allyson L.
    Sillett, Stephen C.
    TREES-STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION, 2024, 38 (04): : 863 - 877
  • [4] Genetic variation in progenies of 23 relic trees of Metasequoia glyptostroboides in their original habitat
    Ke-Bing DU
    Lin XU
    Ming-He LI
    Bao-Xian SHEN
    Forest Ecosystems, 2013, (01) : 1 - 12
  • [5] ISOLATION AND ANALYSIS OF THE HEMICELLULOSES OF THE FOSSIL TREE (METASEQUOIA-GLYPTOSTROBOIDES)
    LU, WD
    WANG, PQ
    LIAO, PY
    JOURNAL OF WOOD CHEMISTRY AND TECHNOLOGY, 1990, 10 (01) : 123 - 132
  • [6] Genetic variation in two ex situ collections of the rare Metasequoia glyptostroboides (Cupressaceae)
    Kuser, JE
    Sheely, DL
    Hendricks, DR
    SILVAE GENETICA, 1997, 46 (05) : 258 - 264
  • [7] Living fossil volatile compounds analysis using SPME GC-MS: Examples of Sequoia, Sequoiadendron and Metasequoia
    Toth, J.
    Hethelyi, E. B.
    Haznagy-Radnai, E.
    Boszormenyi, A.
    Czigle, S.
    PLANTA MEDICA, 2016, 82
  • [8] Identification and Functional Analysis of LncRNAs in Response to Seed Aging in Metasequoia glyptostroboides by Third Generation Sequencing Technology
    Luo, Yongjian
    Le, Jingyu
    Zhang, Yixin
    Wang, Ru
    Li, Qing
    Lu, Xinxiong
    Liu, Jun
    Deng, Zhijun
    FORESTS, 2022, 13 (10):
  • [9] A chemotaxonomic analysis of terpenoid variation in Cannabis
    Hillig, KW
    BIOCHEMICAL SYSTEMATICS AND ECOLOGY, 2004, 32 (10) : 875 - 891
  • [10] COMPARATIVE CYTOPHOTOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF MESOPHYLL CELL-WALLS OF LEAVES BELONGING TO YOUNG AND MATURE SEQUOIADENDRON-GIGANTEUM
    MONTEUUIS, O
    GENESTIER, S
    BULLETIN DE LA SOCIETE BOTANIQUE DE FRANCE-LETTRES BOTANIQUES, 1989, 136 (02): : 103 - 107