Country-specific reference values for PROMIS(R) pain, physical function and participation measures compared to US reference values

被引:8
|
作者
Terwee, Caroline B. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Roorda, Leo D. [3 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Epidemiol & Data Sci, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Amsterdam Publ Hlth Res Inst, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Amsterdam Rehabil Res Ctr Reade, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Epidemiol & Data Sci, Boelelaan 1089a, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Patient-reported outcomes; questionnaires; PROMIS; reference values; pain; physical function; participation; REPORTED OUTCOMES MEASUREMENT; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; DUTCH-FLEMISH TRANSLATION; ITEM BANKS; COMMUNICATION; SYMPTOMS;
D O I
10.1080/07853890.2022.2149849
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS(R)) is commonly used across medical conditions. To facilitate interpretation of scores across countries, we calculated Dutch reference values for PROMIS Physical Function (PROMIS-PF), Pain Interference (PROMIS-PI), Pain Behavior (PROMIS-PB), Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities (PROMIS-APSRA), and Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities (PROMIS-SSRA), as compared to US reference values. Patients and methods A panel completed full PROMIS-PF (n=1310), PROMIS-PI and PROMIS-PB (n=1052), and PROMIS-APSRA and PROMIS-SSRA (n=1002) item banks and reported their level of health per domain (no, mild, moderate, severe limitations). T-scores were calculated by sample and subgroups (age, gender, self-reported level of domain). Distribution-based and anchor-based thresholds for mild, moderate, and severe scores were determined. Results Mean T-scores were close to the US mean of 50 for PROMIS-PF (49.8) and PROMIS-APSRA (50.6), lower for PROMIS-SSRA (47.5) and higher for PROMIS-PI (54.9) and PROMIS-PB (52.0). Distribution-based thresholds for mild, moderate, and severe scores were comparable to US recommended cut-off values (except for PROMIS-PI) but participants reported limitations 'earlier' than suggested thresholds. Conclusion Dutch reference values were close to US reference values for some PROMIS domains but not all. We recommend country-specific reference values to facilitate worldwide PROMIS use. KEY MESSAGES PROMIS offers universally applicable IRT-based efficient and patient-friendly measures to assess commonly relevant patient-reported outcomes across medical conditions. To support the use of PROMIS in daily clinical practice and research across the world, country-specific general population reference values should be obtained. More research is necessary to obtain reliable and valid cut-off values for what constitutes mild, moderate and severe scores from the patients' perspective.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 11
页数:11
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] REFERENCE VALUES: COUNTRY-SPECIFIC ESTIMATES OF VALUE OF STATISTICAL QALY (VSQ)
    Chamielec, C.
    Tehard, B.
    Roze, S.
    Borget, I
    Levy, P.
    Detournay, B.
    Chevalier, J.
    de Pouvourville, G.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2020, 23 : S646 - S646
  • [2] PROMIS cancer-specific reference values for the US Cancer Population
    Jensen, Roxanne
    Moinpour, Carol M.
    Reeve, Bryce B.
    Lobo, Tania
    Potosky, Arnold
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2015, 24 : 129 - 133
  • [3] Reference Values for Physical Performance Measures in the Aging Working Population
    Cote, Mark P.
    Kenny, Anne
    Dussetschleger, Jeffrey
    Farr, Dana
    Chaurasia, Ashok
    Cherniack, Martin
    HUMAN FACTORS, 2014, 56 (01) : 228 - 242
  • [4] Health-Related Physical Fitness Measures: Reference Values and Reference Equations for Use in Clinical Practice
    Tveter, Anne Therese
    Dagfinrud, Hanne
    Moseng, Tuva
    Holm, Inger
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2014, 95 (07): : 1366 - 1373
  • [5] Patient-specific reference values for objective physical function tests: data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative
    Harkey, Matthew S.
    Price, Lori Lyn
    Reid, Kieran F.
    Lo, Grace H.
    Liu, Shao-Hsien
    Lapane, Kate L.
    Dantas, Lucas Ogura
    McAlindon, Timothy E.
    Driban, Jeffrey B.
    CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2020, 39 (06) : 1961 - 1970
  • [6] Patient-specific reference values for objective physical function tests: data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative
    Matthew S. Harkey
    Lori Lyn Price
    Kieran F. Reid
    Grace H. Lo
    Shao-Hsien Liu
    Kate L. Lapane
    Lucas Ogura Dantas
    Timothy E. McAlindon
    Jeffrey B. Driban
    Clinical Rheumatology, 2020, 39 : 1961 - 1970
  • [7] VALUES OF ARGON VISCOSITY MEASURED AS FUNCTION OF PRESSURE COMPARED TO VALUES CALCULATED FOR REFERENCE SYSTEM OF LENNARD-JONES FLUID
    VERMESSE, J
    COMPTES RENDUS HEBDOMADAIRES DES SEANCES DE L ACADEMIE DES SCIENCES SERIE B, 1973, 277 (12): : 273 - 276
  • [8] Physical performance and body composition reference values for modern US Marine Corps women
    Potter, Adam W.
    Looney, David P.
    Tharion, William J.
    Nindl, Lyndsey J.
    Pazmino, Angie
    Soto, Lara D.
    Arcidiacono, Danielle M.
    Friedl, Karl E.
    BMJ NUTRITION, PREVENTION & HEALTH, 2023, 6 (02) : 234 - 242
  • [9] Age-specific reference values for cardiorespiratory fitness in healthy Koreans compared to Western nations
    Park, Y. Yoonjee
    Jang, W. Y.
    Kim, W. H.
    Kim, E. J.
    Kang, D. O.
    Park, E. J.
    Na, J. O.
    Choi, C. U.
    Kim, J. W.
    Rha, S. W.
    Park, C. G.
    Seo, H. S.
    Park, S. J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2019, 21 : 282 - 283
  • [10] Spinal form and function profile. Reference values for clinical use in low back pain
    Schroeder, J.
    Braumann, K. -M.
    Reer, R.
    ORTHOPADE, 2014, 43 (09): : 841 - 849