How to Reduce Item Nonresponse in Face-to-Face Surveys? A Review and Evidence from the European Social Survey

被引:0
|
作者
Groenemann, Malte [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Mannheim, Grad Sch Econ & Social Sci, D-68131 Mannheim, Germany
[2] Univ Mannheim, Grad Sch Econ & Social Sci, D-68131 Mannheim, Germany
来源
关键词
item nonresponse; survey design; survey error; face-to-face surveys; fixed-ef-fects negative binomial regression; DATA QUALITY; RESPONDENT; IMPACT; UNIT;
D O I
10.12758/mda.2024.02
中图分类号
O1 [数学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
I review the literature on item nonresponse in surveys. Based on this review, I extend the satisficing model with respondents' privacy concerns to incorporate all relevant aspects of the response process for item nonresponse. I review proposed strategies to reduce item nonresponse and test selected strategies. Results suggest that boosting respondents' use of showcards and interviewing in the respondents' primary language might be promising ways to reduce item nonresponse. Other people present during the interview have only a small association with the number of refusals. Matching the age and gender of respondents and interviewers appears not to be a worthwhile strategy.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] How to Reduce Item Nonresponse in Face-to-Face Surveys? A Review and Evidence from the European Social Survey
    Groenemann, Malte
    [J]. METHODS DATA ANALYSES, 2024, 18 (02): : 165 - 184
  • [2] Item Nonresponse in Face-to-Face Interviews with Children
    Haunberger, Sigrid
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OFFICIAL STATISTICS, 2014, 30 (03) : 459 - 477
  • [3] "Interviewer" Effects in Face-to-Face Surveys: A Function of Sampling, Measurement Error, or Nonresponse?
    West, Brady T.
    Kreuter, Frauke
    Jaenichen, Ursula
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OFFICIAL STATISTICS, 2013, 29 (02) : 277 - 297
  • [4] Postal, telephone, and face-to-face surveys: How comparable are they?
    Bonnel, P
    [J]. TRANSPORT SURVEY QUALITY AND INNOVATION, 2003, : 215 - 237
  • [5] A COMPARISON OF NONRESPONSE IN MAIL, TELEPHONE, AND FACE-TO-FACE SURVEYS - APPLYING MULTILEVEL MODELING TO METAANALYSIS
    HOX, JJ
    DELEEUW, ED
    [J]. QUALITY & QUANTITY, 1994, 28 (04) : 329 - 344
  • [6] ARE INCENTIVE EFFECTS ON RESPONSE RATES AND NONRESPONSE BIAS IN LARGE-SCALE, FACE-TO-FACE SURVEYS GENERALIZABLE TO GERMANY? EVIDENCE FROM TEN EXPERIMENTS
    Pforr, Klaus
    Blohm, Michael
    Blom, Annelies G.
    Erdel, Barbara
    Felderer, Barbara
    Fraessdorf, Mathis
    Hajek, Kristin
    Helmschrott, Susanne
    Kleinert, Corinna
    Koch, Achim
    Krieger, Ulrich
    Kroh, Martin
    Martin, Silke
    Sassenroth, Denise
    Schmiedeberg, Claudia
    Truedinger, Eva-Maria
    Rammstedt, Beatrice
    [J]. PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 2015, 79 (03) : 740 - 768
  • [7] Comparing data from online and face-to-face surveys
    Duffy, B
    Smith, K
    Terhanian, G
    Bremer, J
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MARKET RESEARCH, 2005, 47 (06) : 615 - 639
  • [8] TRENDS IN U.S. FACE-TO-FACE HOUSEHOLD SURVEY NONRESPONSE AND LEVEL OF EFFORT
    Williams, Douglas
    Brick, J. Michael
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURVEY STATISTICS AND METHODOLOGY, 2018, 6 (02) : 186 - 211
  • [9] Placebo statements in list experiments: Evidence from a face-to-face survey in Singapore
    Riambau, Guillem
    Ostwald, Kai
    [J]. POLITICAL SCIENCE RESEARCH AND METHODS, 2021, 9 (01) : 172 - 179
  • [10] Monetary Incentives in Large-Scale Face-to-Face Surveys: Evidence from a Series of Experiments
    Blohm, Michael
    Koch, Achim
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC OPINION RESEARCH, 2021, 33 (03) : 690 - 702