Site of Ambulance Origination and Billing for Out-of-Network Services

被引:0
|
作者
Gong, Jung Ho [1 ,2 ]
Azad, Chao Long [1 ,3 ]
Zhang, Gongliang [1 ,4 ]
Means Jr, Kenneth R. [1 ]
Aliu, Oluseyi [3 ]
Giladi, Aviram M. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Medstar Union Mem Hosp, Curtis Natl Hand Ctr, Baltimore, MD USA
[2] Brown Univ, Warren Alpert Med Sch, Providence, RI USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ Hosp, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Baltimore, MD USA
[4] Medstar Hlth Res Inst, Hyattsville, MD USA
[5] Medstar Union Mem Hosp, Curtis Natl Hand Ctr, 3333 N Calvert St, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.0118
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Importance The No Surprises Act implemented in 2022 aims to protect patients from surprise out-of-network (OON) bills, but it does not include ground ambulance services. Understanding ground ambulance OON and balance billing patterns from previous years could guide legislation aimed to protect patients following ground ambulance use. Objective To characterize OON billing from ground ambulance services by evaluating whether OON billing risk differs by the site of ambulance origination (home, hospital, nonhospital medical facility, or scene of incident). Design, Setting, and ParticipantsCross-sectional study of the Merative MarketScan dataset between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2020, using claims-based data from employer-based private health insurance plans in the US. Participants included patients who utilized ground ambulances during the study period. Data were analyzed from June to December 2023. Exposure Medical encounter requiring ground ambulance transportation. Main Outcomes and Measures Ground ambulance OON billing prevalence was calcuated. Linear probability models adjusted for state-level mixed effects were fit to evaluate OON billing probability across ambulance origins. Secondary outcomes included the allowed payment, patient cost-sharing amounts, and potential balance bills for OON ambulances. Results Among 2 031 937 ground ambulance services (1 375 977 unique patients) meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 1 072 791 (52.8%) rides transported men, and the mean (SD) patient age was 41 (18) years. Of all services, 1 113 676 (54.8%) were billed OON. OON billing probabilities for ambulances originating from home or scene were higher by 12.0 percentage points (PP) (95% CI, 11.8-12.2 PP; P < .001 for home; 95% CI, 11.7-12.2 PP; P < .001 for scene) vs those originating from hospitals. Mean (SD) total financial burden, including cost-sharing and potential balance bills per ambulance service, was $434.70 ($415.99) per service billed OON vs $132.21 ($244.92) per service billed in-network. Conclusions and Relevance In this cross-sectional study of over 2 million ground ambulance services, ambulances originating from home, the scene of an incident, and nonhospital medical facilities were more likely to result in OON bills. Legislation is needed to protect patients from surprise billing following use of ground ambulances, more than half of which resulted in OON billing. Future legislation should at minimum offer protections for these subsets of patients often calling for an ambulance in urgent or emergent situations.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] No More Surprises - New Legislation on Out-of-Network Billing
    Chhabra, Karan R.
    Fuse Brown, Erin
    Ryan, Andrew M.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2021, 384 (15): : 1381 - 1383
  • [2] Radiologists' Out-of-Network Billing Trends, 2007 to 2021
    Parikh, Jay R.
    Drake, Alexandra R.
    Waid, Mikki D.
    Rula, Elizabeth Y.
    Christensen, Eric W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2024, 21 (06) : 851 - 857
  • [3] Surprise! Out-of-Network Billing for Emergency Care in the United States
    Cooper, Zack
    Scott Morton, Fiona
    Shekita, Nathan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2020, 128 (09) : 3626 - 3677
  • [4] Out-of-Network "Surprise Billing" in Massachusetts: Estimating the Prevalence and Financial Impact
    Huang, Yue
    Nasuti, Laura
    Auerbach, David
    [J]. HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2021, 56 : 13 - 13
  • [5] Reducing Unfair Out-of-Network Billing - Integrated Approaches to Protecting Patients
    Hall, Mark A.
    Adler, Loren
    Ginsburg, Paul B.
    Trish, Erin
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2019, 380 (07): : 610 - 612
  • [6] Out-Of-Network Billing And Negotiated Payments For Hospital-Based Physicians
    Cooper, Zack
    Hao Nguyen
    Shekita, Nathan
    Morton, Fiona Scott
    [J]. HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2020, 39 (01) : 24 - 32
  • [7] Understanding Surprise Out-of-Network Billing in Hand and Upper Extremity Care
    Long, Chao
    Cho, Brian H.
    Giladi, Aviram M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2021, 46 (03): : 236 - 240
  • [8] Out-of-Network Air Ambulance Bills: Prevalence, Magnitude, and Policy Solutions
    Brown, Erin C. Fuse
    Trish, Erin
    Ly, Bich
    Hall, Mark
    Adler, Loren
    [J]. MILBANK QUARTERLY, 2020, 98 (03): : 747 - 774
  • [9] Federal Out-of-Network Balance Billing Legislation: Context and Implications for Radiology Practices
    Heller, Richard E., III
    Gaines, Ed
    Parti, Naveen
    Duszak, Richard, Jr.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2021, 300 (03) : 506 - 511
  • [10] Out-of-Network Billing in Privately Insured Patients Undergoing Elective Orthopaedic Surgery
    Wang, Kevin Y.
    Suresh, Krishna, V
    Harris, Andrew
    Marrache, Majd
    Puvanesarajah, Varun
    Levy, Joseph
    Jain, Amit
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2021, 29 (24) : 1072 - 1078