Fixed Functional Appliance Therapy With and Without Skeletal Anchorage in Class II Malocclusion: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

被引:0
|
作者
Rajamanickam, Preethi [1 ]
Sundari, K. K. Shantha [1 ]
机构
[1] Saveetha Inst Med & Tech Sci, Saveetha Dent Coll, Dept Orthodont, Chennai 600077, Tamil Nadu, India
关键词
Skeletal anchorage; Forsus; Herbst; Lower incisor inclination; FATIGUE RESISTANT DEVICE; HERBST TREATMENT; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1177/23202068231190199
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background:For its synergistic effects in producing skeletal changes as well as to lessen the proclination of the lower incisors, which is a common negative result of mandibular advancement, fixed functional appliances with skeletal anchorage have recently been used.Aim:Objective was to evaluate the skeletal and dentoalveolar effects with fixed functional appliances with and without skeletal anchorage.Methods:Electronic database search and manual search were performed up to 2021, April in four databases namely The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Lilac, and Google Scholar. RCTs that employed the use of fixed functional appliances in Class II malocclusion with and without skeletal anchoring were collected. Two co-authors independently extracted the data, and a pre-designed template was followed during the data extraction process. Data including inclusion and exclusion criteria; study design, the year of publication; age and gender of the patients; type of fixed functional device; stage of skeletal maturation; size and site of mini-implant or miniplate placement, amount of force applied in grams or Newtons; method of study outcome assessment (2D or 3D); and follow up were collected. The skeletal and dentoalveolar parameters were extracted.Results:The risk of bias was evaluated, and the SMD and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were also calculated. Four RCTs were evaluated for qualitative and quantitative analysis. The review involved data of 179 Class II individuals. The results of a random-effects meta-analysis showed that the SNB differed significantly from the control group (SMD = 0.50 (95% CI -1.55 to -0.10)). No significant differences noted between the two groups in terms of lower incisor inclination and mandibular length changes [SMD = -0.04 (95% CI -2.06 to 1.98) and -1.33 (95% CI -3.28 to 0.62), respectively]. The studies under this were not able to provide enough data to draw any conclusions about the effects of using skeletal anchorage with FFA.Conclusion:According to the evidence that is currently available, using FFA coupled with skeletal anchorage does not appear to have any superior skeletal effects than those without skeletal anchorage.
引用
收藏
页码:101 / 109
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effects of skeletal anchorage on mandibular rotation with fixed functional appliance therapy in class II malocclusion patients-A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Muley, Aboli Jaydeep
    Chavan, Santosh Jetu
    Bhad, Wasundhara
    Shekokar, Shrutika S.
    Khade, Dipak M.
    APOS TRENDS IN ORTHODONTICS, 2023, 13 (03) : 176 - 183
  • [2] Effect of functional appliance therapy on the quality of life in skeletal Class II malocclusion
    Imani, Mohammad Moslem
    Tabaii, Elaheh Seyed
    Jamshidi, Saba
    Arab, Sepideh
    AUSTRALASIAN ORTHODONTIC JOURNAL, 2018, 34 (02): : 225 - 231
  • [3] Skeletal Anchorage in Treating Skeletal Class II Malocclusion in Growing Patients Using the Herbst Appliance
    Manni, Antonio
    Pera, Stefano
    Gastaldi, Giorgio
    Boggio, Andrea
    Cozzani, Mauro
    ORAL, 2023, 3 (04): : 539 - 544
  • [4] Herbst appliance with skeletal anchorage versus dental anchorage in adolescents with Class II malocclusion: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
    Klaus Barretto dos Santos Lopes Batista
    Tatiana Lima
    Nathália Palomares
    Felipe de Assis Carvalho
    Cátia Quintão
    José Augusto Mendes Miguel
    Yin-Ling Lin
    Ting-Li Su
    Kevin O’Brien
    Trials, 18
  • [5] Herbst appliance with skeletal anchorage versus dental anchorage in adolescents with Class II malocclusion: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
    dos Santos Lopes Batista, Klaus Barretto
    Lima, Tatiana
    Palomares, Nathalia
    Carvalho, Felipe de Assis
    Quintao, Catia
    Mendes Miguel, Jose Augusto
    Lin, Yin-Ling
    Su, Ting-Li
    O'Brien, Kevin
    TRIALS, 2017, 18
  • [6] Development of a new fixed functional appliance for treatment of skeletal class II malocclusion. First report
    Kinzinger G.
    Ostheimer J.
    Förster F.
    Kwandt P.B.
    Reul H.
    Diedrich P.
    Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie, 2002, 63 (5): : 384 - 399
  • [7] Stability of Class II Fixed Functional Appliance Therapy - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Bock, N. C.
    von Bremen, J.
    Ruf, S.
    INFORMATIONEN AUS ORTHODONTIE UND KIEFERORTHOPAEDIE, 2016, 48 (03): : 176 - 187
  • [8] Effects of fixed functional appliances with temporary anchorage devices on Class II malocclusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Huang, Yanmei
    Sun, Wentian
    Xiong, Xin
    Zhang, Zihan
    Liu, Jin
    Wang, Jun
    JOURNAL OF THE WORLD FEDERATION OF ORTHODONTISTS, 2021, 10 (02) : 59 - 69
  • [9] Treatment timing of MARA and fixed appliance therapy of Class II malocclusion
    Ghislanzoni, Luis Tomas Huanca
    Baccetti, Tiziano
    Toll, Douglas
    Defraia, Efisio
    McNamara, James A., Jr.
    Franchi, Lorenzo
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2013, 35 (03) : 394 - 400
  • [10] Management of skeletal class II malocclusion using bimaxillary skeletal anchorage supported fixed functional appliances A novel technique
    Kochar, Gagan Deep
    Londhe, S. M.
    Shivpuri, Anubhav
    Chopra, S. S.
    Mitra, Rajat
    Verma, Munish
    JOURNAL OF OROFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS-FORTSCHRITTE DER KIEFERORTHOPADIE, 2021, 82 (01): : 42 - 53