Course design as a stronger predictor of student evaluation of quality and student engagement than teacher ratings

被引:1
|
作者
Levinsson, Henrik [1 ]
Nilsson, August [1 ,2 ]
Martensson, Katarina [3 ]
Persson, Stefan D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Dept Psychol, Box 213, S-22100 Lund, Sweden
[2] Oslo Metropolitan Univ, Oslo Business Sch, Oslo, Norway
[3] Lund Univ, Div Higher Educ Dev, Lund, Sweden
关键词
Student engagement; Perceived quality; Course design; Teachers; Student Evaluation of Teaching; PERCEPTIONS;
D O I
10.1007/s10734-024-01197-y
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Research on Student Evaluation of Teaching (SET) has indicated that course design is at least as important as teachers' performance for student-rated perceived quality and student engagement. Our data analysis of more than 6000 SETs confirms this. Two hierarchical multiple regression models revealed that course design significantly predicts perceived quality more strongly than teachers, and that course design significantly predicts student engagement independent of teachers. While the variable teachers is a significant predictor of perceived quality, it is not a significant predictor of student engagement. In line with previous research, the results suggest it is important to highlight the vital impact of course design. The results are discussed particularly in relation to improved teaching practice and student learning, but also in terms of how student evaluations of teaching can be used in meaningful ways.
引用
收藏
页码:1997 / 2013
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Student Ratings of Teaching Effectiveness: Student Engagement and Course Characteristics
    Beran, Tanya
    Violato, Claudio
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF HIGHER EDUCATION, 2009, 39 (01): : 1 - 13
  • [2] The quality of student ratings of teacher behaviour
    Rob De Jong
    Klaas J. Westerhof
    Learning Environments Research, 2001, 4 (1) : 51 - 85
  • [3] Student Evaluations of Teaching There Is More to Course Evaluations Than Student Ratings
    Oermann, Marilyn H.
    NURSE EDUCATOR, 2017, 42 (02) : 55 - 56
  • [4] DIFFERENCES IN COURSE GRADES AND STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHER PERFORMANCE
    WEIGEL, RG
    OETTING, ER
    TASTO, DL
    SCHOOL AND SOCIETY, 1971, 99 (2330): : 60 - 62
  • [5] Teacher Instruction as a Predictor for Student Engagement and Disruptive Behaviors
    Scott, Terrance M.
    Hirn, Regina G.
    Alter, Peter J.
    PREVENTING SCHOOL FAILURE, 2014, 58 (04): : 193 - 200
  • [6] Teacher ratings of student engagement with educational software: An exploratory study
    Robert L. Bangert-Drowns
    Curtis Pyke
    Educational Technology Research and Development, 2002, 50 (2) : 23 - 37
  • [7] COMPARING SUPERVISING TEACHER RATINGS AND STUDENT TEACHER SELF-RATINGS OF ELEMENTARY STUDENT TEACHING
    BRIGGS, LD
    RICHARDSON, WD
    SEFZIK, WP
    EDUCATION, 1985, 106 (02): : 150 - 159
  • [8] GENERALIZABILITY OF STUDENT-RATINGS OF INSTRUCTION - ESTIMATION OF TEACHER AND COURSE COMPONENTS
    GILLMORE, GM
    KANE, MT
    NACCARATO, RW
    JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT, 1978, 15 (01) : 1 - 13
  • [9] Influence of Course Design on Student Engagement and Motivation in an Online Course
    Subramanian, Kalpathi
    Budhrani, Kiran
    SIGCSE 2020: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 51ST ACM TECHNICAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2020, : 303 - 308
  • [10] The impact of teacher work engagement on student engagement: Teaching quality as a mediator
    Xiong, Lidan
    Yuan, Feng
    SOCIAL BEHAVIOR AND PERSONALITY, 2024, 52 (09):