Implementing a Produce Prescription Program at Three Federally Qualified Health Centers to Help Patients Manage Their Diabetes or Prediabetes: A Qualitative Assessment of Clinic Staff Experiences in Los Angeles County, California, USA

被引:0
|
作者
Ayala, Victoria [1 ]
Caldwell, Julia I. [1 ]
Darwish-Elsherbiny, Fatinah [1 ]
Shah, Dipa [1 ]
Kuo, Tony [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Los Angeles Cty Dept Publ Hlth, Nutr & Phys Act Program, Div Chron Dis & Injury Prevent, Los Angeles, CA 90010 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Dept Family Med, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[3] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Fielding Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[4] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Clin & Translat Sci Inst, Populat Hlth Program, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
来源
DIABETOLOGY | 2023年 / 4卷 / 03期
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
produce prescription program; program implementation; food as medicine; fruit and vegetable consumption; healthcare setting; public health; diabetes; prediabetes;
D O I
10.3390/diabetology4030025
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Through a partnership with three Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs), the local health department in Los Angeles County implemented a produce prescription program (PPR) to increase fresh fruit and vegetable purchases among patients with diabetes or prediabetes. The PPR, which began in 2020, provided eligible patients with a USD 40 voucher every month for 6 months to promote the purchase of fresh produce at large-chain grocery stores. To address gaps in current practice and program delivery, this qualitative assessment describes staff experiences with the PPR, documenting the facilitators and barriers they encountered while implementing the program. Fifteen clinic staff (i.e., PPR implementers) were interviewed for this assessment. Thematic analysis and coding were conducted using the ATLAS.ti software; the coding was carried out by two separate coders. Interviewees discussed the importance of having preexisting partnerships and programs to support the PPR at their clinic site. Hidden costs related to implementing the program included a large and unexpected amount of staff time devoted to enrolling patients into the program. Collecting quality data and having limited expertise to rigorously evaluate the program were other challenges. Because patients often share their food with their family, the monthly USD 40 incentive was generally not enough to support their needs; interviewees suggested giving a higher inventive amount to those with a larger household. Future PPR efforts and similar food incentive programs should consider these and other facilitators and barriers to implementation and sustainability, especially when making adjustments to these programs to improve services and access to food resources.
引用
收藏
页码:282 / 293
页数:12
相关论文
empty
未找到相关数据