Surrogate Modeling for Bayesian Optimization Beyond a Single Gaussian Process

被引:8
|
作者
Lu, Qin [1 ]
Polyzos, Konstantinos D. [1 ]
Li, Bingcong [1 ]
Giannakis, Georgios B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
关键词
Bayesian optimization; Gaussian processes; ensemble learning; Thompson sampling; Bayesian regret analysis;
D O I
10.1109/TPAMI.2023.3264741
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Bayesian optimization (BO) has well-documented merits for optimizing black-box functions with an expensive evaluation cost. Such functions emerge in applications as diverse as hyperparameter tuning, drug discovery, and robotics. BO hinges on a Bayesian surrogate model to sequentially select query points so as to balance exploration with exploitation of the search space. Most existing works rely on a single Gaussian process (GP) based surrogate model, where the kernel function form is typically preselected using domain knowledge. To bypass such a design process, this paper leverages an ensemble (E) of GPs to adaptively select the surrogate model fit on-the-fly, yielding a GP mixture posterior with enhanced expressiveness for the sought function. Acquisition of the next evaluation input using this EGP-based function posterior is then enabled by Thompson sampling (TS) that requires no additional design parameters. To endow function sampling with scalability, random feature-based kernel approximation is leveraged per GP model. The novel EGP-TS readily accommodates parallel operation. To further establish convergence of the proposed EGP-TS to the global optimum, analysis is conducted based on the notion of Bayesian regret for both sequential and parallel settings. Tests on synthetic functions and real-world applications showcase the merits of the proposed method.
引用
收藏
页码:11283 / 11296
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Bayesian optimization with Gaussian process surrogate model for source localization
    Jenkins, William F.
    Gerstoft, Peter
    Park, Yongsung
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2023, 154 (03): : 1459 - 1470
  • [2] Geoacoustic inversion using Bayesian optimization with a Gaussian process surrogate model
    Jenkins, William F.
    Gerstoft, Peter
    Park, Yongsung
    Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1600, 156 (02): : 812 - 822
  • [3] Geoacoustic inversion using Bayesian optimization with a Gaussian process surrogate model
    Jenkins, William F.
    Gerstoft, Peter
    Park, Yongsung
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2024, 156 (02): : 812 - 822
  • [4] Bayesian migration of Gaussian process regression for rapid process modeling and optimization
    Yan, Wenjin
    Hu, Shuangquan
    Yang, Yanhui
    Gao, Furong
    Chen, Tao
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2011, 166 (03) : 1095 - 1103
  • [5] Extrapolative Bayesian Optimization with Gaussian Process and Neural Network Ensemble Surrogate Models
    Lim, Yee-Fun
    Ng, Chee Koon
    Vaitesswar, U. S.
    Hippalgaonkar, Kedar
    ADVANCED INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2021, 3 (11)
  • [6] Iterative construction of Gaussian process surrogate models for Bayesian inference
    Alawieh, Leen
    Goodman, Jonathan
    Bell, John B.
    JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PLANNING AND INFERENCE, 2020, 207 : 55 - 72
  • [7] A Survey on High-dimensional Gaussian Process Modeling with Application to Bayesian Optimization
    Binois M.
    Wycoff N.
    ACM Transactions on Evolutionary Learning and Optimization, 2022, 2 (02):
  • [8] Sparse Spectrum Gaussian Process for Bayesian Optimization
    Yang, Ang
    Li, Cheng
    Rana, Santu
    Gupta, Sunil
    Venkatesh, Svetha
    ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY AND DATA MINING, PAKDD 2021, PT II, 2021, 12713 : 257 - 268
  • [9] Gaussian process as complement to test functions for surrogate modeling
    Haftka, Raphael T.
    Park, Chanyoung
    STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2020, 61 (03) : 855 - 861
  • [10] Gaussian process as complement to test functions for surrogate modeling
    Raphael T. Haftka
    Chanyoung Park
    Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2020, 61 : 855 - 861