Neurobehavioral effects of general anesthesia and cochlear implantation on hearing-impaired infants: A prospective observational cohort study

被引:0
|
作者
Ma, Li [1 ]
Yu, Yue [1 ]
Zhou, Xuhui [1 ]
Shi, Jinya [1 ]
Le, Nanyang [1 ]
Liang, Yudan [1 ]
Li, Jingjie [1 ]
Jiang, Hong [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Shanghai Peoples Hosp 9, Sch Med, Dept Anaesthesiol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
来源
BRAIN AND BEHAVIOR | 2023年 / 13卷 / 10期
关键词
cochlear implantation; general anesthesia; infant; prolonged anesthetic exposure; YOUNG-CHILDREN; PERFORMANCE; EXPOSURE; OUTCOMES; SURGERY; IMPACT; SAFETY; SKILLS; DEAF;
D O I
10.1002/brb3.3216
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
IntroductionThe potential adverse effects of prolonged exposure to anesthetics in pediatric patients with severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss remain unclear. This study aimed to examine whether early bilateral cochlear implantation involving long-duration anesthetic exposure caused greater developmental impairment than that with unilateral cochlear implantation. MethodsThis prospective observational study included normally developing infants with bilateral severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss aged 6 months to 2 years who were candidates for unilateral/bilateral cochlear implantation surgery. Baseline (T0), 6-month (T1), and 1-year (T2) Gesell Scale scores were measured. The outcomes included fine motor, adaptability, gross motor, language, and social skills scale 6 and 12 months postoperatively. ResultThe 90 enrolled children with bilateral severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss (unilateral n = 43; bilateral n = 47) had a younger bilateral group (11.00 & PLUSMN; 3.66 vs. 15.63 & PLUSMN; 6.99 months, p < .001). Anesthesia duration was longer in the bilateral group (271.57 & PLUSMN; 36.09 vs. 148.81 & PLUSMN; 25.60 min, p < .001). Gross motor, fine motor, adaptability, and language scores improved in both groups, and no significant between-group differences occurred in the fine motor scale at T1 and T2. Language developmental quotients improved significantly in the bilateral group compared with the unilateral group at T1 (mean differences: 25.07 & PLUSMN; 4.37 vs. 10.88 & PLUSMN; 4.61, p < .001) and T2 (mean differences: 34.98 & PLUSMN; 5.94 vs. 15.28 & PLUSMN; 6.55, p < .001). Stepwise regression revealed that gross motor, adaptability, language, and social skill developmental quotients at T1 were positively correlated with those at T0. Gross motor, fine motor, and social skill developmental quotients at T2 were negatively correlated with age at operation. Language developmental quotients were positively correlated with T0 values (p < .001) and in the bilateral group (p < .001) at T1 and T2. ConclusionsWhen evaluating young children with bilateral severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss, despite longer exposures to general anesthesia, bilateral cochlear implantations were associated with more improvement in language scores and no differences in other skills compared with those with only unilateral implantation.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Bilateral Cochlear Implantation for Hearing-Impaired Children: Criterion of Candidacy Derived from an Observational Study
    Lovett, Rosemary Elizabeth Susan
    Vickers, Deborah Anne
    Summerfield, Arthur Quentin
    EAR AND HEARING, 2015, 36 (01): : 14 - 23
  • [2] Influence of cochlear implantation on the working ability of hearing-impaired patients: A prospective study on potential influencing factors
    Lailach, Susen
    Martin, Johanna
    Stephan, Paula
    Kronesser, Dominique
    Zahnert, Thomas
    Neudert, Marcus
    COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 25 (02) : 109 - 121
  • [3] Listening Preference for the Native Language Compared to an Unfamiliar Language in Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Infants After Cochlear Implantation
    Kishon-Rabin, Liat
    Harel, Tammy
    Hildesheimer, Minka
    Segal, Osnat
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2010, 31 (08) : 1275 - 1280
  • [4] The benefits of sequential bilateral cochlear implantation for hearing-impaired children
    Steffens, Thomas
    Lesinski-Schiedat, Anke
    Strutz, Jurgen
    Aschendorff, Antje
    Klenzner, Thomas
    Ruehl, Stephanie
    Voss, Bettina
    Wesarg, Thomas
    Laszig, Roland
    Lenarz, Thomas
    ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA, 2008, 128 (02) : 164 - 176
  • [5] Mothers' speech to hearing-impaired infants and children with cochlear implants
    Bergeson, Tonya R.
    Miller, Rachel J.
    McCune, Kasi
    INFANCY, 2006, 10 (03) : 221 - 240
  • [6] TINNITUS IN THE PROFOUNDLY HEARING-IMPAIRED AND THE EFFECTS OF COCHLEAR IMPLANTS
    TYLER, RS
    ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 1995, 104 (04): : 25 - 30
  • [7] The Effect of Cochlear Implantation on Nasalance of Speech in Postlingually Hearing-Impaired Adults
    Hassan, Sabah M.
    Malki, Khalid H.
    Mesallam, Tamer A.
    Farahat, Mohamad
    Bukhari, Manal
    Murry, Thomas
    JOURNAL OF VOICE, 2012, 26 (05)
  • [8] From the Beginning to the Present: The History of Cochlear Implantation for Hearing-Impaired Children
    Bertram, B.
    SPRACHE-STIMME-GEHOR, 2010, 34 (04): : 217 - 222
  • [9] Prelexical vocalization in normal hearing and hearing-impaired infants before and after cochlear implantation and its relation to early auditory skills
    Kishon-Rabin, L
    Taitelbaum-Swead, R
    Ezrati-Vinacour, R
    Hildesheimer, M
    EAR AND HEARING, 2005, 26 (04): : 17S - 29S
  • [10] Cochlear Implantation in Hearing-Impaired Elderly: Clinical Challenges and Opportunities to Optimize Outcome
    Illg, Angelika
    Lenarz, Thomas
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2022, 16