Comparative Study of Percutaneous Dilatational Tracheostomy and Conventional Surgical Tracheostomy in Critically Ill Adult Patients

The present study was aimed to compare percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT) with that of conventional surgical tracheostomy (ST) in critically ill adult patients requiring tracheostomy for respiratory management. For this purpose 32 critically ill patients, admitted to the ICU between July 2016 and June 2018, were subjected to tracheostomy and randomly divided into two groups (PDT and ST) of 16 patients each. Mean duration of intubation was similar between the two procedures while the mean size of the tracheostomy tube was smaller in percutaneous technique. In comparison, post-operative infection after 7 days seem to be statistically lowered and the length of scar tend to be smaller in PDT patients. Although early and late post-operative complication rates are not statistically significant in the PDT groups, yet investigations of the long-term outcome following PDT are, therefore, necessary. Generally, PDT has lower acute complications than ST, although this may vary by the specific PDT technique. Patient factor may also influence complications. In view of the benefit versus risks in tracheostomy, PDT may be considered the "procedure of choice" for performing elective tracheostomies in critically ill adult patients.