Concurrent optimization of parameter and tolerance design based on the two-stage Bayesian sampling method

被引:5
|
作者
Ma, Yan [1 ]
Wang, Jianjun [1 ,3 ]
Tu, Yiliu [2 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Econ & Management, Dept Management Sci & Engn, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Calgary, SCHULICH Sch Engn, Dept Mech & Mfg Engn, Univ Drive 2500 NW, Calgary, AB, Canada
[3] Nanjing Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Econ & Management, Dept Management Sci & Engn, Nanjing 210094, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
来源
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Quality design; Bayesian method; parameter design; tolerance design; quality loss function; MULTIRESPONSE SURFACE OPTIMIZATION; GENERALIZED LINEAR-MODELS; ROBUST PARAMETER; QUALITY LOSS; PACKAGE;
D O I
10.1080/16843703.2023.2165290
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Researchers usually expect to reduce costs while improving product robustness in product quality design. The concurrent optimization of parameter and tolerance design assumes that the output response follows a normal distribution. However, non-normal responses are also common in product quality design. As for the concurrent optimization of parameter and tolerance design with a non-normal response, a novel total cost function based on the two-stage Bayesian sampling method is proposed in this paper. First, the hierarchical Bayesian model constructs the functional relationship between output response, input factors, and tolerance variables. Secondly, a two-stage Bayesian sampling method is used to obtain the simulated values of the output responses. The simulated response values are used to build the rejection cost and quality loss functions. Then, the genetic algorithm is used to optimize the constructed total cost model, including the tolerance cost, rejection cost, and quality loss. Finally, the effectiveness of the proposed method is demonstrated by two examples. The research results show that the proposed method in this paper can effectively improve product quality and reduce manufacturing costs when considering the uncertainty of model parameters and the variation of the output response.
引用
收藏
页码:88 / 110
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Two-Stage Parameter Optimization Method for Capacitive Power Transfer Systems
    Xia, Jinglin
    Yuan, Xinmei
    Lu, Sizhao
    Li, Jun
    Luo, Shuling
    Li, Siqi
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER ELECTRONICS, 2022, 37 (01) : 1102 - 1117
  • [2] Ranked Set Sampling Based Regression Estimators in Two-Stage Sampling Design
    Yanglem, Worthing
    Khongji, Phrangstone
    JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL THEORY AND APPLICATIONS, 2024, 23 (04): : 442 - 455
  • [3] A Two-Stage Simulation Optimization Method Based on Metamodel
    Liu, Zhizhao
    Li, Wei
    Yang, Ming
    THEORY, METHODOLOGY, TOOLS AND APPLICATIONS FOR MODELING AND SIMULATION OF COMPLEX SYSTEMS, PT IV, 2016, 646 : 82 - 91
  • [4] Bayesian Two-Stage Adaptive Design in Bioequivalence
    Liu, Shengjie
    Gao, Jun
    Zheng, Yuling
    Huang, Lei
    Yan, Fangrong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOSTATISTICS, 2020, 16 (01):
  • [5] Two-stage Kernel Bayesian Optimization in High Dimensions
    Tan, Jian
    Nayman, Niv
    UNCERTAINTY IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2023, 216 : 2099 - 2110
  • [6] A Two-Stage Method for Indoor WiFi Positioning Based on Bayesian Estimation
    Tanaka, Yui
    Ohta, Masaya
    2018 IEEE 7TH GLOBAL CONFERENCE ON CONSUMER ELECTRONICS (GCCE 2018), 2018, : 357 - 358
  • [7] A fast edge-based two-stage direct sampling method
    Bai, Hexiang
    Mariethoz, Gregoire
    COMPUTERS & GEOSCIENCES, 2021, 150
  • [8] A Bayesian method for robust tolerance control and parameter design
    Rajagopal, Ramkumar
    Del Castillo, Enrique
    IIE TRANSACTIONS, 2006, 38 (08) : 685 - 697
  • [9] Two-stage Bayesian experimental design optimization for measuring soil–water characteristic curve
    Shao-Lin Ding
    Dian-Qing Li
    Zi-Jun Cao
    Wenqi Du
    Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 2022, 81
  • [10] Bayesian two-stage optimal design for mixture models
    Lin, HF
    Myers, RH
    Ye, KY
    JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL COMPUTATION AND SIMULATION, 2000, 66 (03) : 209 - 231