Comparison of Opioid-Based Versus Opioid-Sparing Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Glioma Surgery

被引:0
|
作者
Anupama, A. S. [1 ]
Kaushal, Ashutosh [1 ]
Waindeskar, Vaishali [1 ]
Saigal, Saurabh [1 ]
Jain, Anuj [1 ]
Kumar, Harish
Mandal, Pranita [1 ]
Kumar, Sandeep [1 ]
Kumari, Sweta [2 ]
Sahoo, Anjan K. [3 ]
机构
[1] All India Inst Med Sci, Anaesthesiol, Bhopal, India
[2] All India Inst Med Sci, Microbiol, Bhopal, India
[3] All India Inst Med Sci, Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Bhopal, India
关键词
mean arterial pressure; heart rate; dexmedetomidine; fentanyl; opioid free anesthesia; DOUBLE-BLIND; DEXMEDETOMIDINE; FENTANYL; ADJUVANT;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.54153
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background In the neurosurgical population, opioids may cause respiratory depression, leading to hypercapnia, increased cerebral blood flow (CBF), and ultimately increased intracranial pressure (ICP), which can mask early signs of intracranial complications and delayed emergence. This study was designed to compare perioperative hemodynamic stability, analgesia, and recovery parameters in opioid-based (fentanyl) general anesthesia versus opioid-sparing (dexmedetomidine) general anesthesia in patients undergoing glioma surgeries. Methodology This prospective observational comparative study compared 52 patients in two groups. Twenty-six (50%) patients in group F received Inj. fentanyl IV (intravenous; bolus 2 mcg/kg 10 minutes before induction and then infusion 1 mcg/kg/hour till 30 minutes before skin closure), whereas 26 (50%) patients in group D received Inj. dexmedetomidine IV (0.5 mcg/kg infusion 10 minutes before induction and then maintenance with a 0.5 mcg/kg/hour infusion till 30 minutes before skin closure). Perioperative heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), Numerical Rating Scale for Pain (NRS) assessment and postoperative emergence time, modified Aldrete score, patient satisfaction, and surgeon satisfaction score were estimated and compared in both groups. Results The mean HR was less in group D compared to group F at following time points - 10 minutes after infusion (P = 0.006), laryngoscopy and intubation (P = 0.003), pinning of the skull (P < 0.001), one hour after dura opening (P = 0.007), two hours after dura opening (P = 0.006), five minutes after extubation (P < 0.001), and 30 minutes after extubation (P = 0.011). MAP was lower in group D compared to group F at the following time intervals: 10 minutes after infusion (P = 0.008), five minutes after extubation (P = 0.007), 30 minutes after extubation (P < 0.001), and one hour after extubation (P = 0.023). A significant decrease in emergence time in group D compared to group F (P < 0.001) was noted. NRS was lower in group D at eight hours (P = 0.005) and 12 hours (P < 0.001) post-extubation. Conclusions Dexmedetomidine can be used as an alternative to fentanyl in terms of perioperative hemodynamic stability, perioperative analgesia, smooth early recovery from anesthesia, patient satisfaction, and surgeon satisfaction.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Opioid-free versus opioid-based anesthesia in pancreatic surgery
    Stéphane Hublet
    Marianne Galland
    Julie Navez
    Patrizia Loi
    Jean Closset
    Patrice Forget
    Pierre Lafère
    BMC Anesthesiology, 22 (1)
  • [2] Opioid-free versus opioid-based anesthesia in pancreatic surgery
    Stephane, Hublet
    Marianne, Galland
    Julie, Navez
    Patrizia, Loi
    Jean, Closset
    Patrice, Forget
    Pierre, Lafere
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2022, 22 (01):
  • [3] Opioid-free and opioid-sparing anesthesia
    Siu, Eric Y.
    Moon, Tiffany S.
    INTERNATIONAL ANESTHESIOLOGY CLINICS, 2020, 58 (02) : 34 - 41
  • [4] Correction to: Opioid-free versus opioid-based anesthesia in pancreatic surgery
    Stéphane Hublet
    Marianne Galland
    Julie Navez
    Patrizia Loi
    Jean Closset
    Patrice Forget
    Pierre Lafère
    BMC Anesthesiology, 22
  • [5] Opioid-free anesthesia versus opioid-based anesthesia in patients undergoing cardiovascular and thoracic surgery: a meta-analysis and systematic review
    Mathew, Dave M.
    Fusco, Peter J.
    Varghese, Kathryn S.
    Awad, Ahmed K.
    Vega, Eamon
    Mathew, Serena M.
    Polizzi, Mia
    George, Jerrin
    Mathew, Christopher S.
    Thomas, Jeremiah J.
    Calixte, Rose
    Ahmed, Adham
    SEMINARS IN CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2023, 27 (03) : 162 - 170
  • [6] Safety and Efficacy of Opioid-sparing Anesthesia Compared With Traditional Opioid Anesthesia
    Lauretta, Maria P.
    Marino, Luca
    Bilotta, Federico
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2025, 41 (02):
  • [7] Opioid-free versus opioid-based anesthesia in pancreatic surgery (vol 22, 9, 2022)
    Hublet, Stephane
    Galland, Marianne
    Navez, Julie
    Loi, Patrizia
    Closset, Jean
    Forget, Patrice
    Lafere, Pierre
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [8] Opioid-Sparing Anesthesia: Gabapentin and Postoperative Pain
    Ladich, Elaine M.
    Zhou, Kelly Q.
    Spence, Dennis L.
    Moore, Chad B.
    JOURNAL OF PERIANESTHESIA NURSING, 2022, 37 (06) : 966 - 970
  • [9] Adjuvants for opioid-sparing anesthesia in enhanced recovery after surgery pathways
    Diz, Jose C.
    MINERVA ANESTESIOLOGICA, 2023, 89 (05) : 371 - 373
  • [10] Opioid-Based vs Opioid-Free Anesthesia in Breast Cancer Surgery
    Naik, Shraddha
    Bhosale, Avinash
    Kale, Dhanashree
    Patil, Pradeep B.
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND BIOALLIED SCIENCES, 2023, 15 : S1033 - S1035