Fostering social inclusion in development-oriented digital food system interventions

被引:4
|
作者
Steinke, Jonathan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Schumann, Charlotte [4 ]
Langan, Simon [3 ,5 ]
Mueller, Anna [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Opola, Felix Ouko [3 ,6 ]
Ortiz-Crespo, Berta [1 ,2 ,3 ]
van Etten, Jacob [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Alliance Biovers Int, Montpellier, France
[2] CIAT, Montpellier, France
[3] Int Food Policy Res Inst, CGIAR Initiat Digital Innovat, Washington, DC USA
[4] Free Univ Berlin, Berlin, Germany
[5] Int Water Management Inst, Colombo, Sri Lanka
[6] Int Water Management Inst, Pretoria, South Africa
关键词
Digital exclusion; Digital divides; ICT; Intersectionality; Inclusive design; Human -centered design; PARTICIPATORY DESIGN; AGRICULTURE; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.agsy.2024.103882
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
CONTEXT: Digital innovations can enhance the participation of often-marginalized social groups - including women and resource-poor farmers in low- and middle-income countries - in sustainable, profitable food systems. But digital interventions can also reinforce existing inequities by further increasing the competitive advantage of user groups privileged with literacy, access to smartphones, or high investment capacity. To ensure that the digital transformation in the Global South leaves no one behind, therefore, deliberate efforts are needed to promote the inclusivity of emerging digital innovations. To date, however, there is a lack of practical guidelines and tools to critically assess, demonstrate, and enhance the inclusivity of digital food systems interventions. Too often, inclusivity remains a blurry concept and distant objective. In result, digital development researchers and practitioners have limited incentives for investing time and effort into safeguarding inclusivity. OBJECTIVE: With this short communication, we intend to contribute to future, practice-oriented discussions about social inclusivity in development-oriented digital interventions for sustainable food systems. We provide a critical reflection on the current discourse around digital inclusion in development context and outline challenges and opportunities for considering inclusivity in the design and deployment of digital food system innovations. METHODS: Drawing on literature as well as the authors' own experiences with the design and implementation of digital innovations within research-for-development, we highlight 'blind spots' in the current discourse around digital inclusion in lowand middle-income country context. We then develop practical suggestions for overcoming these limitations. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: We propose a concrete agenda for enabling researchers and other innovation stakeholders, including donors, to contribute to more inclusive digital food system innovation in lowand middle-income countries. First, a standard concept and procedure is required for transparently assessing the inclusivity of digital services. Second, as many digital development stakeholders work under resource constraints, simple design tools can help them effectively consider social inclusion criteria during the design of digital solutions. Lastly, a stronger emphasis on inclusivity is required throughout the research-for-development system, ensuring that design processes themselves are inclusive, rather than considering only the final digital products. SIGNIFICANCE: As the importance of digital innovation keeps growing within the wider agricultural development discourse, this article helps researchers and practitioners gain conceptual clarity on the goal of digital inclusion. Through concrete suggestions on how inclusivity could be considered in practice, the article promotes a more equitable, inclusive digital transformation of food systems.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] "Fostering social inclusion in development-oriented digital food system interventions" (vol 215, 103882, 2024)
    Steinke, Jonathan
    Schumann, Charlotte
    Langan, Simon
    Mueller, Anna
    Opola, Felix Ouko
    Ortiz-Crespo, Berta
    van Etten, Jacob
    AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2024, 217
  • [2] China in global digital trade governance: towards a development-oriented agenda?
    He, Yujia
    Zeng, Ka
    INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS, 2024, 100 (05) : 2195 - 2215
  • [3] Importance-Performance-Analysis as a Module for Management-Oriented and Development-Oriented Evaluation of Social Services
    Moisl, Dominique
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVALUATION, 2011, 10 (01): : 69 - 97
  • [4] Digital Inclusion and Human Development: Is Digital Inclusion a Social Determinant of Health that Matters?
    Qureshi, Sajda
    Oladokun, Blessing
    Tekale, Keerti
    Nadendla, Kavya
    IMPLICATIONS OF INFORMATION AND DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES FOR DEVELOPMENT, PT II, ICT4D 2024, 2024, 709 : 46 - 57
  • [5] Social Enterprise Development-oriented Poverty Alleviation and Sustainable Development of Relative Poverty Groups in Rural Areas
    Xing Jianye
    IFSRAP 2013 - THE FIRST INTERNATIONAL FORUM ON STUDIES OF RURAL AREAS AND PEASANTS, 2014, 6
  • [6] Social and Cultural Influences in Reception of a Development-oriented Television Programme in a Multi-ethnic Society
    Ahmad, Jamaliah
    Abdullah, Iskandar
    PERTANIKA JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE AND HUMANITIES, 2005, 13 (01): : 47 - 66
  • [7] Development-oriented economic and social reforms vs the neo-liberal agenda in south Asia
    Bagchi, AK
    ADJUSTMENT AND BEYOND: THE REFORM EXPERIENCE IN SOUTH ASIA, 2001, (128): : 322 - 329
  • [8] Social class differences in consumption propensity in contemporary China – from survival-oriented consumption to development-oriented consumption
    Zhang Y.
    The Journal of Chinese Sociology, 4 (1)
  • [9] DEVELOPING A SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT-ORIENTED PICTURE BOOK SELECTION SYSTEM THROUGH EMPLOYING THE MODIFIED DELPHI METHOD
    Yeh, Shin-Cheng
    Li, Hsin-Ya
    JOURNAL OF BALTIC SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2022, 21 (06): : 967 - 988
  • [10] Focus shift needed: From development-oriented to social security-based poverty alleviation in rural China
    Chong, Cong
    Cai, Meng
    Yue, Ximing
    ECONOMIC AND POLITICAL STUDIES-EPS, 2022, 10 (01): : 62 - 84