Osseointegration Potential Assessment of Bone Graft Materials Loaded with Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Peri-Implant Bone Defects

被引:4
|
作者
Tseng, Kuo-Fang [1 ]
Shiu, Shiau-Ting [1 ,2 ]
Hung, Chia-Yi [1 ,3 ]
Chan, Ya-Hui [4 ]
Chee, Tze-Jian [1 ]
Huang, Pai-Chun [1 ]
Lai, Pin-Chuang [5 ]
Feng, Sheng-Wei [1 ,3 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Taipei Med Univ, Coll Oral Med, Sch Dent, Taipei City 10301, Taiwan
[2] Taipei Med Univ, Shuang Ho Hosp, Dept Dent, New Taipei City 35041, Taiwan
[3] Natl Def Med Ctr, Grad Inst Dent Sci, Sch Dent, Taipei City 114201, Taiwan
[4] Taipei Med Univ, Coll Oral Med, Sch Oral Hyg, Taipei City 110301, Taiwan
[5] Univ Missouri Kansas City, Sch Dent, Dept Periodont, Kansas City, MO 64108 USA
[6] Taipei Med Univ Hosp, Dept Dent, Div Prosthodont, Taipei City 11031, Taiwan
关键词
implant stability; osseointegration; peri-implant defect; bone graft materials; mesenchymal stem cells; ALGAE-DERIVED HYDROXYAPATITE; REGENERATION; SUBSTITUTES; PHOSPHATE; TIBIA;
D O I
10.3390/ijms25020862
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Many studies have been exploring the use of bone graft materials (BGMs) and mesenchymal stem cells in bone defect reconstruction. However, the regeneration potential of Algipore (highly purified hydroxyapatite) and Biphasic (hydroxyapatite/beta-tricalcium phosphate) BGMs combined with bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) remains unclear. Therefore, we evaluated their osseointegration capacities in reconstructing peri-implant bone defects. The cellular characteristics of BMSCs and the material properties of Algipore and Biphasic were assessed in vitro. Four experimental groups-Algipore, Biphasic, Algipore+BMSCs, and Biphasic+BMSCs-were designed in a rabbit tibia peri-implant defect model. Implant stability parameters were measured. After 4 and 8 weeks of healing, all samples were evaluated using micro-CT, histological, and histomorphometric analysis. In the energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy experiment, the Ca/P ratio was higher for Algipore (1.67) than for Biphasic (1.44). The ISQ values continuously increased, and the PTV values gradually decreased for all groups during the healing period. Both Algipore and Biphasic BGM promoted new bone regeneration. Higher implant stability and bone volume density were observed when Algipore and Biphasic BGMs were combined with BMSCs. Biphasic BGM exhibited a faster degradation rate than Algipore BGM. Notably, after eight weeks of healing, Algipore with BSMCs showed more bone-implant contact than Biphasic alone (p < 0.05). Both Algipore and Biphasic are efficient in reconstructing peri-implant bone defects. In addition, Algipore BGM incorporation with BSMCs displayed the best performance in enhancing implant stability and osseointegration potential.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A comparison of different bone graft materials in peri-implant guided bone regeneration
    Artas, Gokhan
    Gul, Mehmet
    Acikan, Izzet
    Kirtay, Mustafa
    Bozoglan, Alihan
    Simsek, Sercan
    Yaman, Ferhan
    Dundar, Serkan
    BRAZILIAN ORAL RESEARCH, 2018, 32
  • [2] Bone morphogenetic protein-2 for peri-implant bone regeneration and osseointegration
    Sigurdsson, TJ
    Fu, E
    Tatakis, DN
    Rohrer, MD
    Wikesjo, UME
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 1997, 8 (05) : 367 - 374
  • [3] Hydroxyapatite particles maintain peri-implant bone mantle during osseointegration in osteoporotic bone
    Tami, Andrea E.
    Leitner, Melanie M.
    Baucke, Michelle G.
    Mueller, Thomas L.
    van Lenthe, G. Harry
    Mueller, Ralph
    To, Keita
    BONE, 2009, 45 (06) : 1117 - 1124
  • [4] Effect on bone formation of the autogenous tooth graft in the treatment of peri-implant vertical bone defects in the minipigs
    Kim S.K.
    Kim S.W.
    Kim K.W.
    Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 37 (1)
  • [5] Bone Substitutes for Peri-Implant Defects of Postextraction Implants
    Santos, Pamela Leticia
    Gunnelli, Jessica Lemos
    Telles, Cristino da Silva
    Betoni Junior, Walter
    Okamoto, Roberta
    Buchignani, Vivian Chiacchio
    Queiroz, Thallita Pereira
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOMATERIALS, 2013, 2013
  • [6] Microbial findings of deep peri-implant bone defects
    Augthun, M
    Conrads, G
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 1997, 12 (01) : 106 - 112
  • [7] Titanium implant with nanostructured zirconia surface promotes maturation of peri-implant bone in osseointegration
    Dusad, Anand
    Chakkalakal, Dennis A.
    Namavar, Fereydoon
    Haider, Hani
    Hanisch, Brock
    Duryee, Michael J.
    Diaz, April
    Rensch, Adam
    Zhang, Yijia
    Hess, Ryan
    Thiele, Geoffrey M.
    Fehringer, Edward V.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART H-JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE, 2013, 227 (H5) : 510 - 522
  • [8] Basis of bone metabolism around dental implants during osseointegration and peri-implant bone loss
    Insua, Angel
    Monje, Alberto
    Wang, Hom-Lay
    Miron, Richard J.
    JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH PART A, 2017, 105 (07) : 2075 - 2089
  • [9] Systemic osteoprotegerin does not improve peri-implant bone volume or osseointegration in rabbits
    Choi, Joseph H.
    Wang, Zhiwei
    Ross, Frederick P.
    van der Meulen, Marjolein C. H.
    Bostrom, Mathias P. G.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 2021, 39 (08) : 1611 - 1621
  • [10] Diagnostic accuracy of CBCT versus intraoral imaging for assessment of peri-implant bone defects
    Song, Dandan
    Shujaat, Sohaib
    Vasconcelos, Karla de Faria
    Huang, Yan
    Politis, Constantinus
    Lambrichts, Ivo
    Jacobs, Reinhilde
    BMC MEDICAL IMAGING, 2021, 21 (01)