Curvature and Bending Direction Error Correction Model of FBG Shape Sensor

被引:3
|
作者
Shang Qiufeng [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Feng, Liu [1 ]
机构
[1] North China Elect Power Univ, Dept Elect Commun Engn, Baoding 071003, Hebei, Peoples R China
[2] North China Elect Power Univ, Hebei Key Lab Power Internet Things Technol, Baoding 071003, Hebei, Peoples R China
[3] North China Elect Power Univ, Baoding Key Lab Opt Fiber Sensing & Opt Commun, Baoding 071003, Hebei, Peoples R China
关键词
shape reconfiguration; fiber Bragg grating; error correction; population optimization; OPTIMIZATION;
D O I
10.3788/AOS231140
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
Objective FBG shape sensors have become a research hotspot in optic fiber sensing. Compared with other shape reconfiguration technologies, they have a series of advantages such as compact structure, high flexibility, resistance to harsh environments and corrosion, and reusability. With the development of FBG shape sensing technology, the requirements for the reconfiguration accuracy of frequency selective surface are more stringent. The laying angle deviation and calibration error of FBG seriously affect the measurement accuracy of curvature and bending direction, resulting in errors in the shape reconstruction of FBG shape sensors. At present, the calibration coefficient or calibration matrix is the main method to correct the measurement curvature and error bending direction errors. Based on the quantitative analysis of experimental processes, this method reduces the experiment randomness through repeated operations. There are problems such as high experimental complexity, insufficient applicability and experimental repeatability, and lack of strict theoretical model support. Therefore, it is necessary to study the correction methods of measurement curvature error and bending direction errors caused by the FBG laying angle deviation and calibration error and propose a more adaptable, more convenient, and smarter error correction method. Methods We build a curvature and bending direction error correction model of the FBG shape sensor and a self-correction model of FBG laying angle deviation and calibration error. According to the Frenet-Serret framework, the functional relationship between the curvature and bending direction of the detection point with the FBG laying angle deviation and calibration error is deduced. An improved artificial rabbit optimization (ARO) algorithm is adopted to self-correct the FBG laying angle and calibration coefficient of the shape sensor, which is performed during calibration. Then, the corrected laying angle and calibration coefficient are substituted into the error correction model to correct the curvature and bending direction of the detection point. Meanwhile, ANSYS simulation and self-made shape sensor reconfiguration experiments are employed to verify the error correction model. During the experiment, the FBG shape sensor is fixed into different shapes by the 3D printed model, the sensor shape is reconstructed by the curvature and bending direction after error correction, and the reconstruction results are compared with those without error correction. Results and Discussions The self-calibration model, curvature error correction model, and bending direction error correction model are verified by the simulation model under different FBG laying angle deviations and calibration errors. The results show that the self-calibration model can simply and efficiently optimize the laying angle deviation and calibration coefficient of FBG (Table 1), and substituting the optimized parameters into the correction model improves the measurement accuracy of the curvature and bending direction of the detection point (Fig. 7). The model practicability is verified by the self-made FBG shape sensor reconfiguration experiment. After laying angle deviation and calibration error correction, the measurement error of curvature and bending direction is reduced, with improved reconstruction accuracy of the FBG shape sensor. The tail point reconfiguration errors of the shape sensor in different forms are reduced from 11. 66 mm, 14. 42 mm, and 22. 6 mm to 4. 43 mm, 5. 67 mm, and 9. 57 mm respectively, and the relative errors are from 2. 56%, 3. 1%, and 4. 96% to 0. 95%, 1. 22%, and 2. 06%. Conclusions We propose the correction model of measurement curvature error and bending direction error of FBG shape sensors. The functional relationship between the measured curvature and bending direction and FBG laying angle and calibration coefficient is deduced theoretically, and a new calculation method for curvature and bending direction is proposed. Additionally, we build a self-correction model based on the ARO optimization algorithm to solve the difficult correction of FBG laying angle deviation and calibration error. We validate the self-correcting and error-correcting models using simulations and shape reconfiguration experiments. The results show that the proposed method can simply and effectively correct the curvature and bending direction of the detection point, and further improve the reconfiguration accuracy of the shape sensor. We propose a new calculation method of curvature and bending direction, and a new calibration coefficient of FBG and a correction method of laying angle deviation. This method is simpler and more efficient than the existing methods, greatly improving the operability and reproducibility of experiments. Meanwhile, it can obtain the bending direction with less measurement data, which reduces the complexity of experiments and data processing.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Improved FBG-Based Shape Sensing Methods for Vascular Catheterization Treatment
    Al-Ahmad, Omar
    Ourak, Mouloud
    Van Roosbroeck, Jan
    Vlekken, Johan
    Vander Poorten, Emmanuel
    [J]. IEEE ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION LETTERS, 2020, 5 (03) : 4687 - 4694
  • [2] [高东 Gao Dong], 2019, [仪器仪表学报, Chinese Journal of Scientific Instrument], V40, P155
  • [3] He C J., 2021, Infrared and Laser Engineering, V50
  • [4] Characterization and calibration of shape sensors based on multicore optical fibre
    Idrisov, Ravil
    Floris, Ignazio
    Rothhardt, Manfred
    Bartelt, Hartmut
    [J]. OPTICAL FIBER TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 61
  • [5] Fiber optical shape sensing of flexible instruments for endovascular navigation
    Jaeckle, Sonja
    Eixmann, Tim
    Schulz-Hildebrandt, Hinnerk
    Huettmann, Gereon
    Paetz, Torben
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOLOGY AND SURGERY, 2019, 14 (12) : 2137 - 2145
  • [6] Juan Zhao, 2020, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, V1684, DOI 10.1088/1742-6596/1684/1/012075
  • [7] Kim JS, 2017, IEEE INT C INT ROBOT, P201, DOI 10.1109/IROS.2017.8202158
  • [8] [李红 Li Hong], 2014, [仪器仪表学报, Chinese Journal of Scientific Instrument], V35, P1744
  • [9] Reconstruction error model of distributed shape sensing based on the reentered frame in OFDR
    Li, Sheng
    Hua, Peidong
    Ding, Zhenyang
    Liu, Kun
    Yang, Yong
    Zhao, Junpeng
    Pan, Ming
    Guo, Haohan
    Zhang, Teng
    Liu, Li
    Jiang, Junfeng
    Liu, Tiegen
    [J]. OPTICS EXPRESS, 2022, 30 (24) : 43255 - 43270
  • [10] Experimental study on an FBG strain sensor
    Liu, Hong-lin
    Zhu, Zheng-wei
    Zheng, Yong
    Liu, Bang
    Xiao, Feng
    [J]. OPTICAL FIBER TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 40 : 144 - 151