Specific Emitter Identification via Sparse Bayesian Learning Versus Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning

被引:6
|
作者
He, Boxiang [1 ]
Wang, Fanggang [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Jiaotong Univ, Frontiers Sci Ctr Smart High Speed Railway Syst, State Key Lab Adv Rail Autonomous Operat, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Model-agnostic meta-learning; sparse Bayesian learning; specific emitter identification; PHYSICAL LAYER AUTHENTICATION; SYSTEMS; CHANNEL; DESIGN; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1109/TIFS.2023.3287073
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
Specific emitter identification (SEI) is a technique to identify the unknown emitters by using the hardware impairment of the transmitter. In this paper, we consider the effect of the wireless channel on the SEI, which deteriorates the identification performance severely. Two identifiers are proposed to address the wireless channel effect from the model-based and the data-based perspectives, respectively. From the model-based perspective, the fingerprint extractor using the sparse Bayesian learning (SBL) is first proposed to jointly estimate the fingerprint parameters, the wireless channel, and the noise power in the multipath fading channels. Then, the classifier using the weighted Euclidean distance is designed to identify the unknown emitter. From the data-based perspective, the model-agnostic meta-learning (MAML) algorithm is adopted to meta-train the convolutional neural network (CNN) on the task collection, which is generated based on the transmitter distortion mechanism and the channel distribution. The trained CNN is fine-tuned on the unseen SEI task and then is used to identify the unknown emitter. Moreover, the Cramer-Rao lower bounds of the estimation of the fingerprint parameters are derived to evaluate the performance of the proposed fingerprint extractor. Numerical results show that the SBL identifier outperforms the MAML one in a small number of samples, while the MAML identifier outperforms the SBL one in a large number of samples. Both identifiers are robust to the wireless channel, obtain better identification performance, and require a small number of samples compared to the existing methods. Furthermore, the simulation results indicate that the mean squared error performance of the SBL fingerprint extractor is close to the performance lower bound.
引用
收藏
页码:3677 / 3691
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Bayesian Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning
    Yoon, Jaesik
    Kim, Taesup
    Dia, Ousmane
    Kim, Sungwoong
    Bengio, Yoshua
    Ahn, Sungjin
    [J]. ADVANCES IN NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMS 31 (NIPS 2018), 2018, 31
  • [2] Specific Emitter Identification With Limited Samples: A Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning Approach
    Yang, Ning
    Zhang, Bangning
    Ding, Guoru
    Wei, Yimin
    Wei, Guofeng
    Wang, Jian
    Guo, Daoxing
    [J]. IEEE COMMUNICATIONS LETTERS, 2022, 26 (02) : 345 - 349
  • [3] Meta weight learning via model-agnostic meta-learning
    Xu, Zhixiong
    Chen, Xiliang
    Tang, Wei
    Lai, Jun
    Cao, Lei
    [J]. NEUROCOMPUTING, 2021, 432 : 124 - 132
  • [4] Probabilistic Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning
    Finn, Chelsea
    Xu, Kelvin
    Levine, Sergey
    [J]. ADVANCES IN NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMS 31 (NIPS 2018), 2018, 31
  • [5] Learning Symbolic Model-Agnostic Loss Functions via Meta-Learning
    Raymond, Christian
    Chen, Qi
    Xue, Bing
    Zhang, Mengjie
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 2023, 45 (11) : 13699 - 13714
  • [6] B-SMALL: A BAYESIAN NEURAL NETWORK APPROACH TO SPARSE MODEL-AGNOSTIC META-LEARNING
    Madan, Anish
    Prasad, Ranjitha
    [J]. 2021 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ACOUSTICS, SPEECH AND SIGNAL PROCESSING (ICASSP 2021), 2021, : 2730 - 2734
  • [7] Is Bayesian Model-Agnostic Meta Learning Better than Model-Agnostic Meta Learning, Provably?
    Chen, Lisha
    Chen, Tianyi
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND STATISTICS, VOL 151, 2022, 151
  • [8] Knowledge Distillation for Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning
    Zhang, Min
    Wang, Donglin
    Gai, Sibo
    [J]. ECAI 2020: 24TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2020, 325 : 1355 - 1362
  • [9] Combining Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning and Transfer Learning for Regression
    Satrya, Wahyu Fadli
    Yun, Ji-Hoon
    [J]. SENSORS, 2023, 23 (02)
  • [10] Task-Robust Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning
    Collins, Liam
    Mokhtari, Aryan
    Shakkottai, Sanjay
    [J]. ADVANCES IN NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMS 33, NEURIPS 2020, 2020, 33