A multi-benefit framework for funding forest management in fire-driven ecosystems across the Western US

被引:12
|
作者
Seipp, Kimberly Quesnel [1 ]
Maurer, Tessa [1 ]
Elias, Micah [1 ,2 ]
Saksa, Phil [1 ]
Keske, Catherine [3 ]
Oleson, Kirsten [4 ]
Egoh, Benis [5 ]
Cleveland, Rachael [4 ]
Nyelele, Charity [5 ,6 ]
Goncalves, Nicolas [3 ]
Hemes, Kyle [7 ]
Wyrsch, Peter [1 ]
Lewis, David [4 ]
Chung, Min Gon [3 ]
Guo, Han [3 ]
Conklin, Martha [3 ]
Bales, Roger [3 ]
机构
[1] Blue Forest Conservat, 5960 S Land Pk Dr 1387, Sacramento, CA 95822 USA
[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[3] Univ Calif Merced, 5200 Lake Rd, Merced, CA 95343 USA
[4] Univ Hawaii Manoa, 2500 Campus Rd, Honolulu, HI 96822 USA
[5] Univ Calif Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
[6] Univ Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904 USA
[7] Stanford Woods Inst Environm, 473 Via Ortega, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
Forest management; Wildfire risk reduction; Natural resource management; Innovative funding framework; Multi -benefit approach; HEALTH IMPACTS; CLIMATE-CHANGE; SIERRA-NEVADA; WILDFIRE; SERVICES; WATER; PAYMENTS; FUTURE; PLACE; SCALE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118270
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Forests across the Western U.S. face unprecedented risk due to historic fire exclusion, environmental degradation, and climate change. Forest management activities like ecological thinning, prescribed burning, and meadow restoration can improve landscape resilience. Resilient forests are at a lower risk of high-intensity wildfires, drought, insects, and other disturbances and provide a wide range of benefits to ecosystems and communities. However, insufficient funding limits implementation of critically needed management. To address this challenge, we propose a multi-benefit framework that leverages the diverse benefits of forest management to engage a suite of stakeholders in sharing project costs. We take a three-pronged approach to develop our conceptual model: examining existing frameworks for environmental project implementation, conducting a literature review of forest management benefits, and evaluating case studies. Through our framework, we describe the steps to engage partners, starting by identifying benefits that could accrue to potential public and private beneficiaries, and moving through an iterative and collaborative process of valuing benefits, which can accrue over different spatial and temporal scales, in close consultation with potential beneficiaries themselves. The aim of this approach is to stack funding streams associated with each valued benefit to fully fund a given forest management project. The multi-benefit framework has the potential to unlock new sources of funding to meet the exceptional challenges of climate and wildfire disturbances. We apply the framework to dry forests of the Western U.S., but opportunities exist for expanding and modifying this approach to any geography or ecosystem where management provides multiple benefits.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 4 条
  • [1] The economic reality of the forest and fuel management deficit on a fire prone western US national forest
    Belavenutti, Pedro
    Chung, Woodam
    Ager, Alan A.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 293
  • [2] Contrasting effects of future wildfire and forest management scenarios on a fire excluded western US landscape
    Ager, Alan A.
    Barros, Ana M. G.
    Day, Michelle A.
    LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2022, 37 (04) : 1091 - 1112
  • [3] Contrasting effects of future wildfire and forest management scenarios on a fire excluded western US landscape
    Alan A. Ager
    Ana M. G. Barros
    Michelle A. Day
    Landscape Ecology, 2022, 37 : 1091 - 1112
  • [4] Multi-scale quantification of anthropogenic, fire, and drought-associated forest disturbances across the continental US, 2000-2014
    Wang, Minzi
    Xu, Chonggang
    Johnson, Daniel J. J.
    Allen, Craig D. D.
    Anderson, Martha
    Wang, Guangxing
    Qie, Guangping
    Solander, Kurt C. C.
    McDowell, Nate G. G.
    FRONTIERS IN FORESTS AND GLOBAL CHANGE, 2022, 5