Does executive compensation mechanism balance performance with risk-taking? Evidence from China's banking system

被引:0
|
作者
Jiang, Yunsong [1 ]
Yuan, Chao [2 ,3 ]
Zhang, Jinyi [4 ]
机构
[1] Hefei Univ Technol, Sch Econ, Hefei, Peoples R China
[2] Jinan Univ, Dept Finance, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Jinan Univ, Inst Finance, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Guangdong Univ Technol, Coll Econ, Dept Finance, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
关键词
Executive compensation mechanism; Bank performance; Bank risk-taking; CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; FINANCIAL CRISIS; INCENTIVES;
D O I
10.1108/K-09-2022-1251
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
PurposeIn this study, the authors demonstrate the inherent connections between bank risk-taking, performance and executive compensation in the banking sector of China by developing a theoretical model and performing empirical tests with simultaneous equation models.Design/methodology/approachThe authors construct a multi-task principal-agent model to capture agency problems in China, and the model can be extended to various cases. In empirical tests, simultaneous equation models are used to examine the theoretical predictions by eliminating endogenous concerns efficiently compared with the methods in the existing literature.FindingsThe results indicate that the regulator fails to provide bank managers with positive incentives to control risk, whereas the compensation guidance policy (2010) proposed by the CBRC alleviates this problem in China. Additionally, the authors established that shareholders reward bank managers for better and more stable performance. The authors propose the introduction of restricted stock options into the compensation design, as the existing compensation design fails to balance the performance and risk-taking of banks.Research limitations/implicationsFirst, the executive compensation structure and details in China are not available. In addition, the equity-based incentive compensation is forbidden. Therefore, this paper cannot provide more details about how the compensation structure affects bank manager behaviours. Secondly, the database consists only 25 listed commercial banks. Luckily, the assets of these banks could account for the vast majority of China's banking assets. The authors also expect that new methodologies such as machine learning and deep learning will be adopted in the research on bank risk management.Practical implicationsFirst, the regulator should optimise the compositions and payment rule of bank executive compensations. Secondly, it is advisable to adopt restricted deferred share reward or stock option compensation in due course. Thirdly, the regulator can require the banks that undertake excessive risks and troubled by moral hazard to increase the independent director proportion on the bank board according to the authors' empirical tests that higher independent proportion prevents the risk accumulations effectively. Fourthly, except for absolute compensation, the gap between executives' salary and average employee's income should be taken account.Originality/valueThis study provides a theoretical framework that incorporates the manager behaviours, executive compensation and bank regulations, and it provides empirical tests by solving endogenous concerns. Additionally, this study examines the effects of China's compensation guidelines issued in 2010. The authors believe that this study adds value to the existing literature by illustrating the compensation mechanism in China.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Does the bank's FinTech innovation reduce its risk-taking? Evidence from China's banking industry
    Li, Chengming
    He, Si
    Tian, Yuan
    Sun, Shiqi
    Ning, Lu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INNOVATION & KNOWLEDGE, 2022, 7 (03):
  • [2] Does stock option-based executive compensation induce risk-taking? An analysis of the banking industry
    Chen, CR
    Steiner, TL
    Whyte, AM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2006, 30 (03) : 915 - 945
  • [3] Deferred cash compensation and risk-taking: Evidence from the Chinese banking industry
    Jiang, Wei
    Liu, Yunguo
    Lobo, Gerald J.
    Xu, Yue
    [J]. PACIFIC-BASIN FINANCE JOURNAL, 2019, 53 : 432 - 448
  • [4] Executive compensation and corporate risk-taking: Evidence from private loan contracts
    Chu, Yongqiang
    Liu, Ming
    Ma, Tao
    Li, Xinming
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2020, 64
  • [5] Shadow banking business and firm risk-taking: Evidence from China
    Si, Deng-Kui
    Li, Xiao-Lin
    [J]. RESEARCH IN INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS AND FINANCE, 2022, 62
  • [6] Non-executive directors and corporate risk-taking: Evidence from China
    Zhang, Siyu
    Lu, Chao
    [J]. ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE, 2024,
  • [7] Environmental performance and corporate risk-taking: Evidence from China
    Zhu, Danyu
    Gao, Xin
    Luo, Zijun
    Xu, Weidong
    [J]. PACIFIC-BASIN FINANCE JOURNAL, 2022, 74
  • [8] ESG performance and corporate risk-taking: Evidence from China
    He, Feng
    Ding, Cong
    Yue, Wei
    Liu, Guanchun
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 87
  • [9] The taxation of bonuses and its effect on executive compensation and risk-taking: Evidence from the UK experience
    von Ehrlich, Maximilian
    Radulescu, Doina
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS & MANAGEMENT STRATEGY, 2017, 26 (03) : 712 - 731
  • [10] Female board representation, risk-taking and performance: Evidence from dual banking systems
    Khan, Mushtaq Hussain
    Fraz, Ahmad
    Hassan, Arshad
    Abedifar, Pejman
    [J]. FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2020, 37