Experimental investigation of EOR mechanisms for cyclic steam injection assisted by flue gas

被引:3
|
作者
Sandoval, M. Maria Isabel [1 ]
Martinez, J. Humberto Jose [1 ]
Munoz, N. Samuel Fernando [1 ]
Molina, V. Daniel Ricardo [2 ]
机构
[1] Grp Invest Recobro Mejorado, Bucaramanga, Colombia
[2] Univ Ind Santander UIS, Lab Espect Atom & Mol, Bucaramanga 678, Colombia
来源
关键词
Flue gas; Cyclic steam injection; EOR mechanism; Physical simulation; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; HEAVY;
D O I
10.1016/j.geoen.2022.211354
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
In Colombia, Cyclic Steam Stimulation (CSS) is deployed as an EOR method to recover heavy oil. However, flue gas from steam generators is a stable long-term CO2 emission source in oil fields. And the adverse effects of this greenhouse gas cannot be ignored, becoming a concern in all countries worldwide. In this study, the cyclic steamflue gas co-injection process (CSS-FG) is proposed as an alternative to improve the performance of CSS, extend the lifetime of this technology, and collect and use the flue gas from steam generators to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions. In this investigation, CSS and CSS-FG were experimentally represented and compared to understand the effect of flue gas addition on the recovery mechanisms at the different stages of CSS, using a one-dimensional core physical simulation. For CSS representation, five steam injection cycles were carried out, and flue gas was added in a sixth cycle to analyze the effect of flue gas on the recovery factor after several stages. Likewise, in the CSS-FG displacement, five cycles were developed, where flue gas-steam was injected since the second to the fifth cycle. The results show that the final oil recovery factors of CSS-FG using 15% of flue gas molar ratio was 41.1%, compared to 15.2% of CSS. In addition, after five-cycle steam stimulation, the recovery factor increased up to 9.2% by adding flue gas in the sixth cycle. The differences in the recovery factors confirmed the synergy between the flue gas and steam even in mature stages of steam stimulation, which facilitated the identification of the recovery mechanisms associated with adding this gas. Phase interaction between the flue gas and heavy oil is promoted during the injection stages. Thereafter, flue gas expands rapidly in the production period, offering a push mechanism that accelerates the fluids production rate. Additionally, the porous medium pressure increases, and the fast depletion rate near the production port when adding flue gas cause foamy oil formation, improving the mobility of heavy oil since the dissolved gas cannot release from the oil because of its high viscosity. These experimental results provide theoretical guidance for improving the effectiveness of the CSS and demonstrate that CSS-FG is an essential method for reducing greenhouse-gas emissions in oil fields.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Investigation of EOR mechanism for flue gas assisted SAGD
    Chen, Hailong
    Wang, Zhuangzhuang
    Wang, Kai
    Li, Zhaomin
    Li, Songyan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2020, 193
  • [2] Mechanisms on expansion of SAGD steam chamber assisted by flue gas
    Lu T.
    Ban X.
    Li Z.
    Gao Y.
    Guo E.
    Yang J.
    Ma H.
    Wang H.
    Wei Y.
    [J]. Shiyou Xuebao/Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2021, 42 (08): : 1072 - 1080
  • [3] Flue gas injection for EOR and sequestration: Case study
    Bender, Serdar
    Akin, Serhat
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2017, 157 : 1093 - 1105
  • [4] Experimental Study on the Cyclic Steam Stimulation Assisted by Flue Gas Under Shallow Heavy-Oil Reservoir Conditions: Optimization of the Steam-Flue Gas Ratio
    Li, Songyan
    Wang, Zhoujie
    Han, Rui
    Wang, Lei
    Hu, Zukang
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ENERGY RESEARCH, 2020, 8
  • [5] 3D experimental investigation on enhanced oil recovery by flue gas assisted steam assisted gravity drainage
    Tao, Lei
    Yuan, Xiao
    Huang, Sen
    Liu, Nannan
    Zhang, Na
    Li, Bingchao
    [J]. ENERGY EXPLORATION & EXPLOITATION, 2021, 39 (04) : 1162 - 1183
  • [6] Thermodynamic Analysis of Alternating Cyclic Steam and Flue Gas Injection for Colombian Heavy Oils
    Naletov, V. A.
    Glebov, M. B.
    Naletov, A. Yu
    Munos, S. F.
    Kafarov, V
    [J]. CHEMISTRY AND TECHNOLOGY OF FUELS AND OILS, 2022, 57 (06) : 926 - 932
  • [7] Thermodynamic Analysis of Alternating Cyclic Steam and Flue Gas Injection for Colombian Heavy Oils
    V. A. Naletov
    M. B. Glebov
    A. Yu. Naletov
    S. F. Munos
    V. Kafarov
    [J]. Chemistry and Technology of Fuels and Oils, 2022, 57 : 926 - 932
  • [8] The Experimental Analysis of the Role of Flue Gas Injection for Horizontal Well Steam Flooding
    Pang, Zhanxi
    Qi, Peng
    Zhang, Fengyi
    Ge, Taotao
    Liu, Huiqing
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESOURCES TECHNOLOGY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2018, 140 (10):
  • [9] Mechanism and application of flue gas-assisted steam injection for heavy oil recovery
    Li B.
    Li B.
    Ji Y.
    Gai P.
    Wang J.
    Li Z.
    Wang C.
    [J]. Shiyou Xuebao/Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2024, 45 (03): : 574 - 585
  • [10] Modeling of EOR in shale reservoirs stimulated by cyclic gas injection
    Wan, Tao
    Meng, Xingbang
    Sheng, James J.
    Watson, Marshall
    [J]. JPT, Journal of Petroleum Technology, 2015, 67 (01): : 75 - 77