Accounting for respondent's preference uncertainty in choice experiments

被引:0
|
作者
Dave, Kaushali [1 ]
Toner, Jeremy [1 ]
Chen, Haibo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leeds, Inst Transport Studies, Leeds LS2 9JT, England
关键词
Preference uncertainty; road traffic noise; environmental valuation; nested logit; error components logit; MODEL;
D O I
10.1080/21606544.2023.2182368
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Preference uncertainty is an important aspect affecting respondents' choices and attribute valuation. However, elicitation of preference uncertainty and its modelling is strongly restricted within choice experiments. This paper applies modelling techniques to account for the preference uncertainty data to evaluate road traffic noise. The paper argues that modelling the preference uncertainty data to examine the error structure can shed significant light on the potential causes of preference uncertainty. The results also reveal that accounting for preference uncertainty data within modelling can have important implications for the valuation exercise. It is found that the nested logit model can examine significant correlation between similar preference certainty levels arising from choice-set characteristics while the error components logit model can be used to examine the effect of inherent respondent uncertainty and stochastic factors on preference uncertainty. The paper therefore recommends treating and accounting for preference uncertainty within choice experiments and thereby examine its impact on any subsequent valuations.
引用
收藏
页码:508 / 523
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Accounting for no difference/preference responses or ties in choice experiments
    Ennis, Daniel M.
    Ennis, John M.
    [J]. FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE, 2012, 23 (01) : 13 - 17
  • [2] Measuring respondent uncertainty in discrete choice experiments via utility suppression
    Ku, Yu-Cheng
    Wu, John
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHOICE MODELLING, 2018, 27 : 1 - 18
  • [3] Handling respondent uncertainty in Choice Experiments: Evaluating recoding approaches against explicit modelling of uncertainty
    Lundhede, Thomas Hedemark
    Olsen, Soren Boye
    Jacobsen, Jette Bredahl
    Thorsen, Bo Jellesmark
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHOICE MODELLING, 2009, 2 (02) : 118 - 147
  • [4] Accounting for model uncertainty in individualized designs for discrete choice experiments
    Consonni, Guido
    Deldossi, Laura
    Saggini, Eleonora
    [J]. JOURNAL OF QUALITY TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 52 (01) : 81 - 96
  • [5] Incorrectly accounting for preference heterogeneity in choice experiments: Implications for welfare measurement
    Torres, Catalina M.
    Colombo, Sergio
    Hanley, Nick
    [J]. ECONOMIA AGRARIA Y RECURSOS NATURALES, 2014, 14 (02): : 97 - 121
  • [6] Respondent Understanding in Discrete Choice Experiments: A Scoping Review
    Pearce, Alison
    Harrison, Mark
    Watson, Verity
    Street, Deborah J.
    Howard, Kirsten
    Bansback, Nick
    Bryan, Stirling
    [J]. PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2021, 14 (01): : 17 - 53
  • [7] Accounting for Respondent Uncertainty to Improve Willingness-to-Pay Estimates
    Moore, Rebecca
    Bishop, Richard C.
    Provencher, Bill
    Champ, Patricia A.
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS-REVUE CANADIENNE D AGROECONOMIE, 2010, 58 (03): : 381 - 401
  • [8] Respondent Understanding in Discrete Choice Experiments: A Scoping Review
    Alison Pearce
    Mark Harrison
    Verity Watson
    Deborah J. Street
    Kirsten Howard
    Nick Bansback
    Stirling Bryan
    [J]. The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 2021, 14 : 17 - 53
  • [9] Accounting for Preference Heterogeneity in Discrete-Choice Experiments: An ISPOR Special Interest Group Report
    Vass, Caroline
    Boeri, Marco
    Karim, Suzanna
    Marshall, Deborah
    Craig, Ben
    Ho, Kerrie-Anne
    Mott, David
    Ngorsuraches, Surachat
    Badawy, Sherif M.
    Muhlbacher, Axel
    Gonzalez, Juan Marcos
    Heidenreich, Sebastian
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2022, 25 (05) : 685 - 694
  • [10] Not bored yet - Revisiting respondent fatigue in stated choice experiments
    Hess, Stephane
    Hensher, David A.
    Daly, Andrew
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2012, 46 (03) : 626 - 644