Thermodynamic model of 45S5 bioglass

被引:0
|
作者
Hruska, Branislav [1 ]
Chromcikova, Maria [1 ,2 ]
Nowicka, Aleksandra [1 ]
Michalkova, Jaroslava [1 ]
Machacek, Jan [3 ]
Liska, Marek [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] A Dubcek Univ Trencin, FunGlass Ctr Funct & Surface Functionalized Glass, Studentska 2, Trencin 91150, Slovakia
[2] TnU AD & FChPT STU, Vitrum Laugaricio Joint Glass Ctr IIC SAS, Studentska 2, Trencin 91150, Slovakia
[3] Univ Chem & Technol, Fac Chem Technol, Dept Glass & Ceram, Technicka 5, Prague 16628, Czech Republic
关键词
Thermodynamic model; Bioglass; Q-distributions; MAS NMR; BIOACTIVE GLASS;
D O I
10.1007/s10973-023-12787-w
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Shakhmatkin and Vedishcheva thermodynamic model (SV TDM) of 45S5 bioglass was evaluated at T = 800 K. From 42 considered system components, only 7 components (Na2O & sdot;SiO2, Na2O & sdot;3CaO & sdot;6SiO(2), 3CaO & sdot;2SiO(2), CaO & sdot;SiO2, 9Na(2)O & sdot;6SiO(2)& sdot;2P(2)O(5), 2CaO & sdot;SiO2, and Na2O & sdot;2CaO & sdot;P2O5) were present in significant equilibrium molar amount. The calculated Q-distribution of silicate units (22.6% of Q(3), 63.1% of Q(2), 10.1% of Q(1), and 4.2% of Q(0)) was compared with the Q-distribution for so-called crystalline reference state (6.3% of Q(3), 93.7% of Q(2)). Further, both Q-distributions were compared with the MAS NMR experimental data published by different authors (e.g. 33.3% of Q(3), 54.5% of Q(2), and 12.2% of Q(1), or 17.8% of Q(3), 76.7% of Q(2), and 5.5% of Q(1)). It was concluded that there is no principal difference between SV TDM and MAS NMR distributions of silicate units. Further the Q-distribution of phosphate units was analysed. The CRS resulted in 100% presence of Q(0) units (i.e. PO43-). The SV TDM resulted in significantly broader distribution, i.e. 4.5% of Q(2), 10.4% of Q(1), and 85.1% of Q(0). This distribution is comparable with those obtained by MAS NMR (e.g. 26.7% of Q(1) and 73.3% of Q(0)).
引用
收藏
页码:11071 / 11075
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Thermal properties and thermodynamic model of lithium doped 45S5 bioglass
    Chromcikova, Maria
    Hruska, Branislav
    Nowicka, Aleksandra
    Machacek, Jan
    Liska, Marek
    JOURNAL OF THERMAL ANALYSIS AND CALORIMETRY, 2024, 149 (19) : 11099 - 11105
  • [2] Thermal properties and thermodynamic model of lithium doped 45S5 bioglass
    Chromcikova, Maria
    Hruska, Branislav
    Nowicka, Aleksandra
    Machacek, Jan
    Liska, Marek
    JOURNAL OF THERMAL ANALYSIS AND CALORIMETRY, 2024, 149 (19) : 11099 - 11105
  • [3] Sintering behavior of 45S5 Bioglass®
    Lefebvre, L.
    Gremillard, L.
    Chevalier, J.
    Bernache-Assolant, D.
    BIOCERAMICS, VOL 20, PTS 1 AND 2, 2008, 361-363 : 265 - +
  • [4] Study on antibacterial effect of 45S5 Bioglass®
    Sheng Hu
    Jiang Chang
    Mingqiu Liu
    Congqin Ning
    Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, 2009, 20 : 281 - 286
  • [5] Mixed alkali effects in Bioglass® 45S5
    Tylkowski, M.
    Brauer, D. S.
    JOURNAL OF NON-CRYSTALLINE SOLIDS, 2013, 376 : 175 - 181
  • [6] Effect of Alumina Addition on 45S5 Bioglass
    Dey, P.
    Pal, S. K.
    Sarkar, R.
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE INDIAN CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2014, 73 (02) : 105 - 109
  • [7] Sintering and crystallisation of 45S5 Bioglass® powder
    Bretcanu, Oana
    Chatzistavrou, Xanthippi
    Paraskevopoulos, Konstantinos
    Conradt, Reinhard
    Thompson, Ian
    Boccaccini, Aldo R.
    JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2009, 29 (16) : 3299 - 3306
  • [8] Occlusion of dentin tubules by 45S5 Bioglass®
    Litkowski, LJ
    Hack, GD
    Sheaffer, HB
    Greenspan, DC
    BIOCERAMICS, VOL 10, 1997, : 411 - 414
  • [9] Influence of phase separation on the devitrification of 45S5 bioglass
    Golovchak, R.
    Thapar, P.
    Ingram, A.
    Savytskii, D.
    Jain, H.
    ACTA BIOMATERIALIA, 2014, 10 (11) : 4878 - 4886
  • [10] Robocast 45S5 bioglass scaffolds: in vitro behavior
    Motealleh, Azadeh
    Eqtesadi, Siamak
    Civantos, Ana
    Pajares, Antonia
    Miranda, Pedro
    JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE, 2017, 52 (15) : 9179 - 9191