Technocracy above partisanship? Comparing the appeal of non-partisan and partisan experts as ministers - A survey in 14 countries

被引:6
|
作者
Vittori, Davide [1 ,2 ]
Rojon, Sebastien [1 ]
Pilet, Jean-Benoit [1 ]
Paulis, Emilien [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Libre Bruxelles, CEVIPOL Ctr Etud Vie polit, Brussels, Belgium
[2] Univ Libre Bruxelles, CEVIPOL Ctr Etud Vie polit, Ave Franklin D Roosevelt 50, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
expertise; experts; health ministers; non-partisan experts; partisan experts; partisanship; populism; survey experiment; technocracy; trust; technocrats; technopols; DEMOCRACY;
D O I
10.1177/13691481231178244
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 ;
摘要
The literature on technocracy has shown that expertise is a crucial factor in driving support for technocrats. However, the literature has not investigated yet what happens when technocrats are opposed to partisan experts. In this article, we want to fill this gap by analysing the support for two potential ministers of health with relevant expertise for their portfolio but with a different relationship to partisan politics. For this purpose, we run a novel survey in 14 European countries with more than 20,000 respondents. Our main results show that non-partisan experts are preferred over partisan experts across Europe, both when citizens have a high sympathy and a low sympathy for the party appointing the minister. However, in the latter case, the effect is more evident.
引用
收藏
页码:779 / 802
页数:24
相关论文
共 3 条