Outcomes of Humeral Allograft-Prosthetic Composites with Plate Fixation in Revision Total Elbow Arthroplasty

被引:0
|
作者
Cheema, Adnan N. [1 ,2 ]
Conyer, Ryan T. [1 ,2 ]
Triplet, Jacob J. [1 ,2 ]
O'Driscoll, Shawn W. [1 ,2 ]
Morrey, Mark E. [1 ,2 ]
Sanchez-Sotelo, Joaquin [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Rochester, MN USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Dept Orthoped Surg, Div Shoulder & Elbow Surg, Rochester, MN 55902 USA
关键词
MORREY TOTAL ELBOW; MASSIVE BONE LOSS; FOLLOW-UP; PRIMARY OSTEOARTHRITIS; RHEUMATOID-ARTHRITIS; CATASTROPHIC FAILURE; DISTAL HUMERUS; RECONSTRUCTION; REPLACEMENT; RESECTION;
D O I
10.2106/JBJS.OA.22.00136
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Traditionally, the reconstruction of severe distal humeral bone loss at the time of revision total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) has used allograft-prosthetic composites (APCs) stabilized with cerclage wires or cables. We have migrated to plate fixation when revision TEA using a humeral APC is performed. This study shows the outcomes of patients treated with a humeral APC with plate fixation during revision TEA.Methods: Between 2009 and 2019, 41 humeral APCs with plate fixation of distal humeral allograft to the native humerus were performed in the setting of revision TEA. There were 12 male patients (29%) and 29 female patients (71%), with a mean age of 63 years (range, 41 to 87 years). The mean allograft length was 12 cm. All elbows had a minimum follow-up of 2 years (mean follow-up, 3.3 years). Patients were evaluated for visual analog scale pain scores, range of motion, the ability to perform select activities of daily living, and the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS). Outcomes including reoperations, complications, and revisions were noted. The most recent radiographs were evaluated for union at the allograft-host interface, failure of the plate-and-screw construct, or component loosening.Results: The mean postoperative flexion was 124 degrees (range, 60 degrees to 150 degrees) and the mean postoperative extension was 26 degrees (range, 0 degrees to 90 degrees); the mean arc of motion was 99 degrees (range, 30 degrees to 150 degrees). The mean MEPS was 58 points (range, 10 to 100 points). Two surgical procedures were complicated by neurologic deficits. The overall reoperation rate was 14 (34%) of 41. Of the 33 patients with complete radiographic follow-up, 12 (36%) had evidence of nonunion at the allograft-host interface with humeral component loosening, 1 (3%) had evidence of partial union, and 1 (3%) had ulnar stem loosening.Conclusions: Revision TEA with a humeral APC using compression plating was successful in approximately two-thirds of the elbows. Further refinement of surgical techniques is needed to improve union rates in these complex cases.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Proximal Femoral Allograft-Prosthetic Composites: Do They Really Restore Bone? A Retrospective Review of Revision Allograft-Prosthetic Composites
    Wilke, Benjamin K.
    Houdek, Matthew T.
    Rose, Peter S.
    Sim, Franklin H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2019, 34 (02): : 346 - 351
  • [2] Allograft-Prosthetic Composite Reconstruction for Massive Bone Loss Including Catastrophic Failure in Total Elbow Arthroplasty
    Morrey, Mark E.
    Sanchez-Sotelo, Joaquin
    Abdel, Matthew P.
    Morrey, Bernard F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2013, 95A (12): : 1117 - 1124
  • [3] Revision total elbow arthroplasty for prosthetic fractures
    Athwal, George S.
    Morrey, Bernard F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2006, 88A (09): : 2017 - 2026
  • [4] Treatment of a humeral metastasis with a composite allograft-prosthetic reconstruction
    Callaert J.
    Nijs S.
    Reynders P.
    Vanderschot P.
    Broos P.
    [J]. European Journal of Trauma, 2004, 30 (4): : 255 - 258
  • [5] ALLOGRAFT-PROSTHETIC COMPOSITE RECONSTRUCTION FOR MASSIVE PROXIMAL HUMERAL BONE LOSS IN REVERSE SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY
    Sanchez-Sotelo, Joaquin
    Wagner, Eric R.
    Houdek, Matthew T.
    [J]. JBJS ESSENTIAL SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2018, 8 (01):
  • [6] Allograft-Prosthetic Composite Reconstruction for Massive Proximal Humeral Bone Loss in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty
    Sanchez-Sotelo, Joaquin
    Wagner, Eric R.
    Sim, Franklin H.
    Houdek, Matthew T.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2017, 99 (24): : 2069 - 2076
  • [7] Outcomes following revision of the revision total elbow arthroplasty
    Domos, Peter
    Chelli, Mikael
    Papanna, Madhavan C.
    Gokaraju, Kishan
    Stanley, David
    Ali, Amjid A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2021, 30 (07) : 1653 - 1661
  • [8] Periprosthetic humeral fractures after total elbow arthroplasty: Treatment with implant revision and strut allograft augmentation
    Sanchez-Sotelo, J
    O'Driscoll, S
    Morrey, BF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2002, 84A (09): : 1642 - 1650
  • [9] A retrospective review of revision proximal humeral allograft-prosthetic composite procedures: an analysis of proximal humeral bone stock restoration
    Reif, Taylor
    Schoch, Bradley
    Spiguel, Andre
    Elhassan, Bassem
    Wright, Thomas
    Sanchez-Sotelo, Joaquin
    Wilke, Benjamin K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2020, 29 (07) : 1353 - 1358
  • [10] Outcomes of Revision Unlinked Total Elbow Arthroplasty for Rheumatoid Elbow
    Kodama, Akira
    Mizuseki, Takaya
    Adachi, Nobuo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-ASIAN-PACIFIC VOLUME, 2023, 28 (04): : 479 - 485