High-frequency data significantly enhances the prediction ability of point and interval estimation

被引:7
|
作者
Liu, Xin [1 ]
Yue, Fu-Jun [1 ]
Guo, Tian-Li [2 ]
Li, Si-Liang [1 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Univ, Inst Surface Earth Syst Sci, Sch Earth Syst Sci, Tianjin 300072, Peoples R China
[2] Northwest A&F Univ, Coll Water Resources & Architectural Engn, Yangling 712100, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Dissolved oxygen; Machine learning; ARIMA-GARCH model; Point prediction; Interval prediction; Different time -scales; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORKS; WATER-QUALITY; DISSOLVED-OXYGEN; CHESAPEAKE BAY; MODEL; MACHINE; UNCERTAINTY;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169289
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Accurate prediction of dissolved oxygen (DO) dynamics is crucial for understanding the influence of environ-mental factors on the stability of aquatic ecosystem. However, limited research has been conducted to determine the optimal frequency of water quality monitoring that ensures continuous assessment of water health while minimizing costs. To address these challenges, the present study developed a hybrid stochastic hydrological model (i.e., ARIMA-GARCH hybrid model) and machine learning (ML) models. The objective of this study is to identify the best-performing model and establish the optimal monitoring frequency. Results revealed that high -frequency DO monitoring data exhibit greater variability compared to low-frequency data. Moreover, the ARIMA-GARCH model demonstrates promising potential in predicting DO concentrations for low-frequency monitoring data, surpassing ML models in performance. Furthermore, increasing the monitoring frequency significantly improves the prediction accuracy of models, regardless of whether point (with lower R2 values of 0.64 and 0.51 for daily detection than these of every 15 min (0.96 and 0.99) at CHQ and LHT, respectively) or interval predictions (with RIW higher values of 2.00 and 1.55 for daily detection higher than these of 0.02 and 0.16 in every 15 min at CHQ and LHT, respectively) are considered. Additionally, a 4 hourly monitoring fre-quency was found to be optimal for water quality assessment using each model. These findings identify the superior performing of the ARIMA-GARCH model and highlight the crucial role of monitoring frequency in enhancing DO prediction and improving model performance.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prediction-based estimation for diffusion models with high-frequency data
    Emil S. Jørgensen
    Michael Sørensen
    Japanese Journal of Statistics and Data Science, 2021, 4 : 483 - 511
  • [2] Prediction-based estimation for diffusion models with high-frequency data
    Jorgensen, Emil S.
    Sorensen, Michael
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF STATISTICS AND DATA SCIENCE, 2021, 4 (01) : 483 - 511
  • [3] Estimation of quarticity with high-frequency data
    Mancino, Maria Elvira
    Sanfelici, Simona
    QUANTITATIVE FINANCE, 2012, 12 (04) : 607 - 622
  • [4] Evaluating interval forecasts of high-frequency financial data
    Clements, MP
    Taylor, N
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECONOMETRICS, 2003, 18 (04) : 445 - 456
  • [5] The Estimation of Leverage Effect With High-Frequency Data
    Wang, Christina D.
    Mykland, Per A.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2014, 109 (505) : 197 - 215
  • [6] Spot volatility estimation for high-frequency data
    Fan, Jianqing
    Wang, Yazhen
    STATISTICS AND ITS INTERFACE, 2008, 1 (02) : 279 - 288
  • [7] GARCH Parameter Estimation Using High-Frequency Data
    Visser, Marcel P.
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMETRICS, 2011, 9 (01) : 162 - 197
  • [8] Occupation density estimation for noisy high-frequency data
    Zhang, Congshan
    Li, Jia
    Bollerslev, Tim
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2022, 227 (01) : 189 - 211
  • [9] Spot Volatility Estimation for High-Frequency Data: Adaptive Estimation in Practice
    Sabel, Till
    Schmidt-Hieber, Johannes
    Munk, Axel
    MODELING AND STOCHASTIC LEARNING FOR FORECASTING IN HIGH DIMENSIONS, 2015, 217 : 213 - 241
  • [10] Covariance estimation using high-frequency data: Sensitivities of estimation methods
    Haugom, Erik
    Lien, Gudbrand
    Veka, Steinar
    Westgaard, Sjur
    ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2014, 43 : 416 - 425