Comprehensive behavioral and physiologic assessment of peripheral and central auditory function in individuals with mild traumatic brain injury

被引:0
|
作者
Stahl, Amy N. [1 ,5 ]
Racca, Jordan M. [2 ,3 ]
Kerley, Cailey I. [4 ]
Anderson, Adam [6 ]
Landman, Bennett [4 ]
Hood, Linda J. [2 ]
Giffford, Rene H. [2 ]
Rex, Tonia S. [6 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Neurosci Grad Program, Nashville, TN USA
[2] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Hearing & Speech Sci, Med Ctr, Nashville, TN USA
[3] Vanderbilt Univ, Vanderbilt Peabody Coll Educ, Collaborat STEM Educ & Outreach, Nashville, TN USA
[4] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Nashville, TN USA
[5] Vanderbilt Univ, Vanderbilt Eye Inst, Dept Ophthalmol & Visual Sci, Med Ctr, Nashville, TN USA
[6] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Nashville, TN USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Traumatic brain injury (TBI); Speech understanding in noise (QuickSIN); Distortion product otoacoustic emissions; (DPOAEs); Middle -ear muscle reflexes (MEMRs); Auditory brainstem responses (ABRs); Middle latency responses (MLRs); Late latency responses (LLRs); PRODUCT OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS; EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS; CLOSED-HEAD INJURY; EVOKED-POTENTIALS; HEARING-LOSS; NOISE EXPOSURE; STEM RESPONSES; GUINEA-PIG; CONCUSSION; NERVE;
D O I
10.1016/j.heares.2023.108928
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Auditory complaints are frequently reported by individuals with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) yet remain difficult to detect in the absence of clinically significant hearing loss. This highlights a growing need to identify sensitive indices of auditory-related mTBI pathophysiology beyond pure-tone thresholds for improved hearing healthcare diagnosis and treatment. Given the heterogeneity of mTBI etiology and the diverse peripheral and central processes required for normal auditory function, the present study sought to determine the audiologic assessments sensitive to mTBI pathophysiology at the group level using a well-rounded test battery of both peripheral and central auditory system function. This test battery included pure-tone detection thresholds, word understanding in quiet, sentence understanding in noise, distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs), middle-ear muscle reflexes (MEMRs), and auditory evoked potentials (AEPs), including auditory brainstem responses (ABRs), middle latency responses (MLRs), and late latency responses (LLRs). Each participant also received magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Compared to the control group, we found that individuals with mTBI had reduced DPOAE amplitudes that revealed a compound effect of age, elevated MEMR thresholds for an ipsilateral broadband noise elicitor, longer ABR Wave I latencies for click and 4 kHz tone burst elicitors, longer ABR Wave III latencies for 4 kHz tone bursts, larger MLR Na and Nb amplitudes, smaller MLR Pb amplitudes, longer MLR Pa latencies, and smaller LLR N1 amplitudes for older individuals with mTBI. Further, mTBI individuals with combined hearing difficulty and noise sensitivity had a greater number of deficits on thalamic and cortical AEP measures compared to those with only one/no self-reported auditory symptoms. This finding was corroborated with MRI, which revealed significant structural differences in the auditory cortical areas of mTBI participants who reported combined hearing difficulty and noise sensitivity, including an enlargement of left transverse temporal gyrus (TTG) and bilateral planum polare (PP). These findings highlight the need for continued investigations toward identifying individualized audiologic assessments and treatments that are sensitive to mTBI pathophysiology.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Neuropsychological assessment of individuals with mild traumatic brain injury
    Raskin, SA
    Mateer, CA
    Tweeten, R
    [J]. CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGIST, 1998, 12 (01): : 21 - 30
  • [2] Central auditory processing disorders after mild traumatic brain injury
    Santhanam, Priya
    Meehan, Anna
    Orrison, William W.
    Wilson, Steffanie H.
    Oakes, Terrence R.
    Weaver, Lindell K.
    [J]. UNDERSEA AND HYPERBARIC MEDICINE, 2019, 46 (03) : 261 - 269
  • [3] Effects of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury on Auditory Function in a Mouse Model
    Amanipour, R.
    Cresoe, S.
    Borlongan, C.
    Frisina, R.
    Walton, J.
    [J]. 2016 32ND SOUTHERN BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING CONFERENCE (SBEC), 2016, : 13 - 14
  • [4] Central auditory processing and self- perception questionnaire after acoustically controlled auditory training in individuals with mild traumatic brain injury
    Buriti, Ana Karina Lima
    Luiz, Cyntia Barbosa Laureano
    Oliveira, Lais Rocha de Barros
    Suriano, Italo Capraro
    Gil, Daniela
    [J]. CODAS, 2024, 36 (02):
  • [5] Assessment of executive function in patients with mild traumatic brain injury
    Brooks, J
    Fos, LA
    Greve, KW
    Hammond, JS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1999, 46 (01): : 159 - 163
  • [6] A Review of the Role of Auditory Evoked Potentials in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Assessment
    Washnik, Nilesh J.
    Anjum, Javad
    Lundgren, Kristine
    Phillips, Susan
    [J]. TRENDS IN HEARING, 2019, 23
  • [7] Special tools for the assessment of balance and dizziness in individuals with mild traumatic brain injury
    Lei-Rivera, Laura
    Sutera, John
    Galatioto, Jessica A.
    Hujsak, Bryan D.
    Gurley, James M.
    [J]. NEUROREHABILITATION, 2013, 32 (03) : 463 - 472
  • [8] Verbal fluency in individuals with mild traumatic brain injury
    Raskin, SA
    Rearick, E
    [J]. NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 10 (03) : 416 - 422
  • [9] Behavioral consequences of mild traumatic brain injury in preschoolers
    Gagner, Charlotte
    Landry-Roy, Catherine
    Bernier, Annie
    Gravel, Jocelyn
    Beauchamp, Miriam H.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2018, 48 (09) : 1551 - 1559
  • [10] Motor Cortex Function in Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Individuals Following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
    Yasen, Alia L.
    Edwards, Eli K.
    Eick, Geeta
    Sterner, Kirstin
    Christie, Anita D.
    [J]. MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2018, 50 (05): : 564 - 564