Embedding expert opinion in a Bayesian network model to predict wheat yield from spring-summer weather

被引:1
|
作者
Mahmood, Salar A. [1 ]
Karampoiki, Maria [2 ]
Hammond, John P. [1 ]
Paraforos, Dimitrios S. [2 ,3 ]
Murdoch, Alistair J. [1 ]
Todman, Lindsay [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Reading, Agr Policy & Dev, Earley Gate POB 237, Reading RG6 6EU, England
[2] Univ Hohenheim, Inst Agr Engn Technol Crop Prod, Garbenstr 9, D-70599 Stuttgart, Germany
[3] Geisenheim Univ, Dept Agr Engn, Von-Lade-Str 1, D-65366 Geisenheim, Germany
来源
关键词
Winer wheat; Weather condition; Expert opinion; Bayesian network; SENSITIVE STAGES; EUROPEAN WHEAT; CLIMATE-CHANGE; WINTER-WHEAT; HEAT-STRESS; CROP; TEMPERATURE; IMPACT; GROWTH; VARIABILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.atech.2023.100224
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
Wheat yield is highly dependent on weather, Therefore, predicting its effect can improve crop management decisions. Various modelling approaches have been used to predict wheat yield including process-based modelling, statistical models, and machine learning. However, these models typically require a large data set for training or fitting. They often also have a limited ability in capturing the effects of small-scale variability, time, and duration of extreme weather events. Here, we develop a Bayesian Network (BN) model by interviewing experts including farmers, embedding their knowledge from years of experience within a quantitative model. These experts identified the period from the beginning of anthesis to the end of grain filling stage as a critical period and maximum temperature, mean temperature and precipitation as key weather variables for inclusion in the BN. To keep the time input from experts manageable, the conditional probability table for the BN was constructed based on their anticipated impact on the mean yield of different weather conditions. The model predicted the yield in the same or neighbouring class (very low, low, medium, high and very high) as the reported yield with low error rate ranging from 9.1 to 15.2% and, when used to estimate the median predicted yield, R2 ranging from 41 to 52%. Interestingly, model successfully predicted the yield in years 1998, 2007, 2012 and 2020 which had the most extreme weather events. Additionally, the more recent data, from 2012 to 2022 was predicted more accurately, especially 2022 season which was not sown yet when eliciting information and recently added to the testing data. Little difference was observed between the predictions made using model parameters based only the opinion of the farm manager from which the test data originated, and the predictions made using the average opinion of a group of 9 experts. The inclusion of causal variables in the model also provided insight into the experts' rationale, allowing unexpected results to be explored. This methodology provides a means to rapidly develop a successful predictive model of wheat yield with limited (or no) data using expert understanding. This model could be tuned and updated with data as it becomes available.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] Influence of weather conditions on entomological and phytopathogenic complexes of winter wheat in autumn and spring-summer growth season of the forest-steppe zone
    Kyrychenko, A.
    Havryliuk, N.
    Kuzmenko, L.
    Raichuk, T.
    Borko, Y.
    [J]. UKRAINIAN JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 2021, 11 (02): : 155 - 158
  • [2] WheatPot: A simple model for spring wheat yield potential using monthly weather data
    Andarzian, B.
    Bakhshandeh, A. M.
    Bannayan, M.
    Emam, Y.
    Fathi, G.
    Saeed, K. Alami
    [J]. BIOSYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2008, 99 (04) : 487 - 495
  • [3] A DYNAMIC-MODEL FOR WATER AND NITROGEN LIMITED GROWTH IN SPRING WHEAT TO PREDICT YIELD AND QUALITY
    TEITTINEN, M
    KARVONEN, T
    PELTONEN, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY AND CROP SCIENCE, 1994, 172 (02) : 90 - 103
  • [4] INFLUENCE OF WEATHER ON YIELD FORMATION OF 2 CULTIVARS OF SPRING WHEAT WITH SAME NITROGEN-FERTILIZATION FROM SOIL AND FERTILIZER
    BRAUN, H
    FISCHBECK, G
    [J]. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ACKER UND PFLANZENBAU-JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY AND CROP SCIENCE, 1978, 147 (01): : 24 - 39
  • [5] Early prediction of spring wheat yields in Saskatchewan from current and historical weather data using the CERES-Wheat model
    Chipanshi, AC
    Ripley, EA
    Lawford, RG
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 1997, 84 (3-4) : 223 - 232
  • [6] Mixed model and stability analysis of spring wheat genotype yield evaluation data from Manitoba, Canada
    Friesen, Lyle F.
    Brule-Babel, Anita L.
    Crow, Gary H.
    Rothenburger, Patricia A.
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE, 2016, 96 (02) : 305 - 320
  • [7] A Bayesian observation error model to predict cyanobacterial biovolume from spring total phosphorus in Lake Mendota, Wisconsin
    Stow, CA
    Carpenter, SR
    Lathrop, RC
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FISHERIES AND AQUATIC SCIENCES, 1997, 54 (02) : 464 - 473
  • [8] Harnessing Expert Knowledge: Defining Bayesian Network Model Priors From Expert Knowledge Only-Prior Elicitation for the Vibration Qualification Problem
    Rizzo, Davinia B.
    Blackburn, Mark R.
    [J]. IEEE SYSTEMS JOURNAL, 2019, 13 (02): : 1895 - 1905
  • [9] Based on historical weather data to predict summer field-scale maize yield: Assimilation of remote sensing data to WOFOST model by ensemble Kalman filter algorithm
    Ren, Shixiong
    Chen, Hao
    Hou, Jian
    Zhao, Peng
    Dong, Quing
    Feng, Hao
    [J]. COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE, 2024, 219
  • [10] Use of a Bayesian Network Model to predict psychiatric illness in individuals with 'at risk mental states' from a general population cohort
    Loch, Alexandre Andrade
    Ara, Anderson
    Hortencio, Lucas
    Marques, Julia Hatagami
    Talib, Leda Leme
    Andrade, Julio Cesar
    Serpa, Mauricio Henriques
    Sanchez, Luciano
    Alves, Tania Maria
    van de Bilt, Martinus Theodorus
    Roessler, Wulf
    Gattaz, Wagner Farid
    [J]. NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 2022, 770