What drives biased odds in sports betting markets: Bettors? irrationality and the role of bookmakers

被引:0
|
作者
Goto, Shingo [1 ]
Yamada, Toru [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rhode Isl, Coll Business, Ballentine Hall,7 Lippitt Rd, Kingston, RI 02881 USA
[2] Nomura Asset Management Co Ltd, 2-2-1 Toyosu,Koto Ku, Tokyo 1350061, Japan
关键词
Longshot; Hot-Hand; Prospect theory; Efficiency; Betting; FAVORITE-LONGSHOT BIAS; GAMBLERS FALLACY; PROSPECT-THEORY; CROSS-SECTION; ASSET PRICES; HOT-HAND; EFFICIENCY; RISK; PROBABILITY; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.iref.2023.03.002
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
In sports betting markets, bookmakers may take speculative exposures to the game outcomes when they can assess the probabilities better than others. We propose a simple model of fixed -odds betting markets in which bookmakers tilt their odds to maximize their own speculative profits. They do so by accommodating bettors' irrationality, thereby reinforcing systematic biases in betting markets. In European football betting markets, the Favorite-Longshot Bias and the Hot-Hand Bias persist despite the increased competition. This is difficult to explain only by bettors' irrationality but consistent with the predicted odds-setting behavior of bookmakers. We discuss the implications for financial market anomalies.
引用
收藏
页码:252 / 270
页数:19
相关论文
共 5 条