Contralateral breast radiation doses in breast cancer patients treated with helical tomotherapy

被引:0
|
作者
Oymak, Ezgi [1 ]
Bozca, Recep [2 ]
Guler, Ozan Cem [2 ]
Onal, Cem [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Iskenderun Gelisim Hosp, Div Radiat Oncol, Antakya, Turkiye
[2] Baskent Univ, Adana Dr Turgut Noyan Res & Treatment Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Fac Med, Adana, Turkiye
[3] Baskent Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Fac Med, Ankara, Turkiye
[4] Baskent Univ, Fac Med, Adana Dr Turgut Noyan Res & Treatment Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Adana Dr, TR-01120 Adana, Turkiye
关键词
Breast cancer; Radiotherapy; Contralateral breast; Dosimetry; Helical tomotherapy; IN-VIVO DOSIMETRY; SECONDARY-CANCER; THERAPY; RADIOTHERAPY; RISK; SURVIVAL; PHOTON; BEAMS; IMRT;
D O I
10.1016/j.meddos.2022.11.002
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
We aimed to evaluate contralateral breast doses calculated with a Treatment Planning System (TPS) and verified with metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor (MOSFET) detectors in patients with earlystage breast cancer (BC) who received helical tomotherapy (HT) after breast-conserving surgery. The dosimetric data of 30 patients (15 left-sided and 15 right-sided) with BC treated with 50.4 Gy to the whole breast and 64.4 Gy to the tumor bed in 28 fractions were analyzed. TPS doses were calculated and MOSFET doses were measured in the contralateral breast (CB) at cranial, caudal, and midpoint and 2 cm lateral to the central point. TPS and MOSFET doses were compared in the entire cohort as well as by tumor location (inner vs outer quadrant) and planning target volume of the breast ( < 1200 cc vs >= 1200 cc). The average doses at superior, inferior, central, and lateral points calculated with the TPS were 0.26 +/- 0.15 cGy, 0.21 +/- 0.09 cGy, 0.65 +/- 0.14 cGy, and 0.50 +/- 0.11 cGy, respectively, and were 0.37 +/- 0.16 cGy, 0.34 +/- 0.12 cGy, 0.60 +/- 0.18 cGy, and 0.34 +/- 0.15 cGy, respectively in MOSFET readings. Except for the central point, TPS-calculated doses and MOSFET readings were differed. The doses to the CB in patients with inner and outer quadrant tumors were not significantly different. In patients with large breasts, MOSFET doses were higher at superior and lateral points than TPS doses, but TPS doses were greater at inferior points. MOSFET readings were higher than TPS calculated doses in patients with inner or outer quadrant tumors in small or large breast volumes. The dose calculated by the TPS and that measured by MOSFET differed by a very small amount. The maximum dose to the CB administered at the midpoint was 1.8 Gy, as calculated using the TPS and confirmed using MOSFET detectors, in patients with early-stage BC undergoing breast-only radiotherapy with HT. (c) 2022 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:61 / 66
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Helical tomotherapy and breast cancer: skin toxicity of the first 85 breast cancer patients treated with tomotherapy
    Uhl, M.
    Sterzing, E.
    Habl, G.
    Schubert, K.
    Debus, J.
    Herfarth, K.
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2011, 187 (10) : 689 - 689
  • [2] Helical Tomotherapy for patients with pectus excavatum treated for early stage breast cancer.
    Alexandre, A.
    Dominique, P.
    Alain, F.
    Youlia, K. M.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2019, 133 : S624 - S625
  • [3] Helical Tomotherapy for patients with pectus excavatum treated for early-stage breast cancer
    Arsene Henry, Alexandre
    Amessis, Malika
    Kirova, Youlia M.
    BREAST JOURNAL, 2020, 26 (07): : 1483 - 1484
  • [4] Helical tomotherapy in breast cancer treatment
    Lauche, Olivier
    Kirova, Youlia M.
    BREAST CANCER MANAGEMENT, 2014, 3 (05) : 441 - 449
  • [5] Breast Cancer Patients Treated by Helical Tomotherapy, Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy, and Volumetric Arc Therapy: Comparison of Lung Doses
    Ho, W. K.
    Ngan, R. K. C.
    Yip, C. W. Y.
    Lee, F. K. H.
    Lui, J. C. F.
    HONG KONG JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2020, 23 (01): : 4 - 11
  • [6] Skin sparing radiation in early breast cancer patients undergoing radiation to intact breast by helical tomotherapy: A planning study in progress
    Saibishkumar, E. P.
    Severin, D.
    Makenzie, M.
    Hanson, J.
    Parliament, M.
    Daly, H.
    Polkosnik, L.-A.
    Urtasun, R.
    Fallone, G.
    Abdulkarim, B. S.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2006, 80 : S69 - S69
  • [7] Helical tomotherapy in patients with breast cancer and complex treatment volumes
    Cendales, Ricardo
    Schiappacasse, Luis
    Schnitman, Franco
    Garcia, Graciela
    Marsiglia, Hugo
    CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 13 (04): : 268 - 274
  • [8] Helical tomotherapy in patients with breast cancer and complex treatment volumes
    Ricardo Cendales
    Luis Schiappacasse
    Franco Schnitman
    Graciela García
    Hugo Marsiglia
    Clinical and Translational Oncology, 2011, 13 : 268 - 274
  • [9] Clinical audit of breast cancer patients treated with helical tomotherapy for irradiation of the internal mammary chain
    Shrivastav, Garima
    Datta, Debanjali
    Wadasadawala, Tabassum
    Rane, Pallavi
    Panda, Subhajit
    Pathak, Rima
    Scaria, Libin
    Krishnamurthy, Revathy
    Sarin, Rajiv
    JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE, 2022, 22
  • [10] The impact of contralateral breast cancer on the outcome of breast cancer patients treated by mastectomy
    Abdalla, I
    Thisted, RA
    Heimann, R
    CANCER JOURNAL, 2000, 6 (04): : 266 - 272