Methodological challenges in systematic reviews of mHealth interventions: Survey and consensus-based recommendations

被引:0
|
作者
Lopez-Alcalde, Jesus [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Wieland, L. Susan [5 ]
Barth, Jurgen
Grainger, Rebecca [6 ]
Baxter, Nancy [7 ]
Heron, Neil [8 ,9 ]
Triantafyllidis, Andreas [10 ]
Carrion, Carme [11 ]
Trecca, Eleonora M. C. [12 ,13 ]
Holl, Felix [14 ,15 ]
Wagner, Ana Maria [14 ]
Edney, Sarah [17 ]
Yan, Yuqian [1 ,2 ]
Campos-Asensio, Concepcion [16 ]
Villanueva, Gemma [18 ]
Ramsey, Rachelle R. [19 ,20 ]
Witt, Claudia M. [1 ,2 ,5 ,21 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Zurich, Inst Complementary & Integrat Med, Sonneggstr 6, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Univ Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Univ Francisco de Vitoria UFV, Fac Med, Madrid, Spain
[4] Hosp Univ Ramon y Cajal, Unidad Bioestadist Clin, Inst Ramon y Cajal Invest Sanitaria IRYCIS, Madrid, Spain
[5] Univ Maryland, Ctr Integrat Med, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD USA
[6] Univ Otago Wellington, Dept Med, Wellington, New Zealand
[7] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Sch Populat & Global Hlth, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[8] Queens Univ Belfast, Ctr Publ Hlth, Belfast, North Ireland
[9] Keele Univ, Sch Med, Keele, Staffs, England
[10] Ctr Res & Technol Hellas, Informat Technol Inst, Thessaloniki, Greece
[11] Univ Oberta Catalunya UOC, eHlth Lab Res Grp, Barcelona, Spain
[12] IRCCS Hosp Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, Dept Otorhinolaryngol & Maxillofacial Surg, San Giovanni Rotondo, FG, Italy
[13] Univ Hosp Foggia, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, Foggia, Italy
[14] Neu Ulm Univ Appl Sci, DigiHlth Inst, Neu Ulm, Germany
[15] Ludwig Maximilian Univ Munich, Inst Med Informat Proc Biometry & Epidemiol, Munich, Germany
[16] Univ Las Palmas Gran Canaria, Complejo Hosp Univ Insular Maternoinfantil, Endocrinol & Nutr Dept, Inst Invest Biomed & Sanitarias, Las Palmas Gran Canaria, Spain
[17] Natl Univ Singapore, Saw Swee Hock Sch Publ Hlth, Singapore, Singapore
[18] Cochrane, Cochrane Response, London, England
[19] Cincinnati Childrens Hosp Med Ctr, Div Behav Med & Clin Psychol, Cincinnati, OH USA
[20] Univ Cincinnati, Coll Med, Dept Pediat, Cincinnati, OH USA
[21] Charite, Inst Social Med Epidemiol & Hlth Econ, Berlin, Germany
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Digital health; eHealth; Systematic reviews; Meta; -analysis; Survey; GUIDANCE; CONDUCT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105345
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Objective: Mobile Health (mHealth) refers to using mobile devices to support health. This study aimed to identify specific methodological challenges in systematic reviews (SRs) of mHealth interventions and to develop guidance for addressing selected challenges. Study Design and Setting: Two-phase participatory research project. First, we sent an online survey to corresponding authors of SRs of mHealth interventions. On a five -category scale, survey respondents rated how challenging they found 24 methodological aspects in SRs of mHealth interventions compared to non-mHealth intervention SRs. Second, a subset of survey respondents participated in an online workshop to discuss recommendations to address the most challenging methodological aspects identified in the survey. Finally, consensusbased recommendations were developed based on the workshop discussion and subsequent interaction via email with the workshop participants and two external mHealth SR authors. Results: We contacted 953 corresponding authors of mHealth intervention SRs, of whom 50 (5 %) completed the survey. All the respondents identified at least one methodological aspect as more or much more challenging in mHealth intervention SRs than in non-mHealth SRs. A median of 11 (IQR 7.25-15) out of 24 aspects (46 %) were rated as more or much more challenging. Those most frequently reported were: defining intervention intensity and components (85 %), extracting mHealth intervention details (71 %), dealing with dynamic research with evolving interventions (70 %), assessing intervention integrity (69 %), defining the intervention (66 %) and maintaining an updated review (65 %). Eleven survey respondents participated in the workshop (five had authored more than three mHealth SRs). Eighteen consensus -based recommendations were developed to address issues related to mHealth intervention integrity and to keep mHealth SRs up to date. Conclusion: mHealth SRs present specific methodological challenges compared to non-mHealth interventions, particularly related to intervention integrity and keeping SRs current. Our recommendations for addressing these challenges can improve mHealth SRs.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Consensus-based recommendations for investigating clinical heterogeneity in systematic reviews
    Gagnier, Joel J.
    Morgenstern, Hal
    Altman, Doug G.
    Berlin, Jesse
    Chang, Stephanie
    McCulloch, Peter
    Sun, Xin
    Moher, David
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2013, 13
  • [2] Consensus-based recommendations for investigating clinical heterogeneity in systematic reviews
    Joel J Gagnier
    Hal Morgenstern
    Doug G Altman
    Jesse Berlin
    Stephanie Chang
    Peter McCulloch
    Xin Sun
    David Moher
    [J]. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 13
  • [3] The Impact of mHealth Interventions: Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews
    Marcolino, Milena Soriano
    Queiroz Oliveira, Joao Antonio
    D'Agostino, Marcelo
    Ribeiro, Antonio Luiz
    Moreira Alkmim, Maria Beatriz
    Novillo-Ortiz, David
    [J]. JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH, 2018, 6 (01):
  • [4] Industry involvement in rheumatology consensus-based recommendations: a systematic review
    Feterman Jimenez, Dominique
    Duron, Garret
    Hendin, Joshua
    Cardoso, Eduardo Mantovani
    Valenzuela-Almada, Maria O.
    Vallejo, Sebastian
    Duarte-Garcia, Ali
    Sufka, Paul
    Whittle, Samuel L.
    Robinson, Philip C.
    Prokop, Larry J.
    Putman, Michael S.
    [J]. LANCET RHEUMATOLOGY, 2022, 4 (02): : E145 - E152
  • [5] Community-acquired Pneumonia Guideline Recommendations-Impact of a Consensus-based Process versus Systematic Reviews
    Wilson, Kevin C.
    Schoenberg, Noah C.
    Cohn, David L.
    Crothers, Kristina
    Fennelly, Kevin P.
    Metlay, Joshua P.
    Saukkonen, Jussi J.
    Strange, Charlie
    Waterer, Grant
    Dweik, Raed
    [J]. CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2021, 73 (07) : E1467 - E1475
  • [6] Slum upgrading review: methodological challenges that arise in systematic reviews of complex interventions
    Turley, Ruth
    Saith, Ruhi
    Bhan, Nandita
    Doyle, Jodie
    Jones, Kirsty
    Waters, Elizabeth
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2013, 35 (01) : 171 - 175
  • [7] Systematic reviews on selected nutrition interventions: Descriptive assessment of conduct and methodological challenges
    Salam R.A.
    Welch V.
    Bhutta Z.A.
    [J]. BMC Nutrition, 1 (1)
  • [8] Management of HAM/TSP Systematic Review and Consensus-based Recommendations 2019
    Araujo, Abelardo
    Bangham, Charles R. M.
    Casseb, Jorge
    Gotuzzo, Eduardo
    Jacobson, Steve
    Martin, Fabiola
    de Oliveira, Augusto Penalva
    Puccioni-Sohler, Marzia
    Taylor, Graham P.
    Yamano, Yoshihisa
    [J]. NEUROLOGY-CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2021, 11 (01) : 49 - 56
  • [9] Consensus-based recommendations in respiratory medicine
    Wilson, Kevin C.
    [J]. EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2020, 56 (06)
  • [10] Recommendations for the management of MPS VI: systematic evidence- and consensus-based guidance
    Akyol, Mehmet Umut
    Alden, Tord D.
    Amartino, Hernan
    Ashworth, Jane
    Belani, Kumar
    Berger, Kenneth I.
    Borgo, Andrea
    Braunlin, Elizabeth
    Eto, Yoshikatsu
    Gold, Jeffrey I.
    Jester, Andrea
    Jones, Simon A.
    Karsli, Cengiz
    Mackenzie, William
    Marinho, Diane Ruschel
    McFadyen, Andrew
    McGill, Jim
    Mitchell, John J.
    Muenzer, Joseph
    Okuyama, Torayuki
    Orchard, Paul J.
    Stevens, Bob
    Thomas, Sophie
    Walker, Robert
    Wynn, Robert
    Giugliani, Roberto
    Harmatz, Paul
    Hendriksz, Christian
    Scarpa, Maurizio
    [J]. ORPHANET JOURNAL OF RARE DISEASES, 2019, 14 (1)