Real world effectiveness of tixagevimab/cilgavimab (Evusheld) in the Omicron era

被引:9
|
作者
Chen, Benjamin [1 ]
Haste, Nina [2 ]
Binkin, Nancy [3 ]
Law, Nancy [1 ]
Horton, Lucy E. E. [1 ]
Yam, Nancy [2 ]
Chen, Victor [2 ]
Abeles, Shira [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Med Infect Dis & Global Publ Hlth, San Diego, CA 92110 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Pharm, La Jolla, CA USA
[3] Univ Calif San Diego, Herbert Wertheim Sch Publ Hlth & Human Longev, La Jolla, CA USA
来源
PLOS ONE | 2023年 / 18卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0275356
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
BackgroundPre-exposure prophylaxis for COVID-19 with tixagevimab/cilgavimab (T/C) received Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) based on results of a clinical trial conducted prior to the emergence of the Omicron variant. The clinical effectiveness of T/C has not been well described in the Omicron era. We examined the incidence of symptomatic illness and hospitalizations among T/C recipients when Omicron accounted for virtually all local cases. MethodsThrough retrospective electronic medical record chart review, we identified patients who received T/C between January 1 -July 31, 2022 within our quaternary referral health system. We determined the incidence of symptomatic COVID-19 infections and hospitalizations due to or presumed to be caused by early Omicron variants before and after receiving T/C (pre-T/C and post-T/C). Chi square and Mann-Whitney Wilcoxon two-sample tests were used to examine differences between the characteristics of those who got COVID-19 before or after T/C prophylaxis, and rate ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to assess differences in hospitalization rates for the two groups. ResultsOf 1295 T/C recipients, 105 (8.1%) developed symptomatic COVID-19 infection before receiving T/C, and 102 (7.9%) developed symptomatic disease after receiving it. Of the 105 patients who developed symptomatic infection pre-T/C, 26 (24.8%) were hospitalized, compared with six of the 102 patients (5.9%) who were diagnosed with COVID-19 post-T/C (RR = 0.24; 95% CI = 0.10-0.55; p = 0.0002). Seven of the 105 (6.7%) patients infected pre-T/C, but none of the 102 infected post-T/C required ICU care. No COVID-related deaths occurred in either group. The majority of COVID-19 cases among those infected pre-T/C treatment occurred during the Omicron BA.1 surge, while the majority of post-T/C cases occurred when Omicron BA.5 was predominant. In both groups, having at least one dose of vaccine strongly protected against hospitalization (pre-T/C group RR = 0.31, 95% CI = 0.17-0.57, p = 0.02; post-T/C group RR = 0.15; 95% CI = 0.03-0.94; p = 0.04). ConclusionWe identified COVID-19 infections after T/C prophylaxis. Among patients who received T/C at our institution, COVID-19 Omicron cases occurring after T/C were one-fourth as likely to require hospitalization compared to those with Omicron prior to T/C. However, due to the presence of changing vaccine coverage, multiple therapies, and changing variants, the effectiveness of T/C in the Omicron era remains difficult to assess.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Real-World Effectiveness of Tixagevimab and Cilgavimab (Evusheld) in Patients With Hematological Malignancies
    Ocon, Anthony J.
    Ocon, Kate E.
    Battaglia, Jennifer
    Low, Soon Khai
    Neupane, Niraj
    Saeed, Hasseen
    Jamshed, Saad
    Mustafa, S. Shahzad
    JOURNAL OF HEMATOLOGY, 2022, 11 (06) : 210 - 215
  • [2] Real-World Experience of Tixagevimab and Cilgavimab (Evusheld) in Rheumatologic Patients on Rituximab
    Ocon, Anthony J.
    Mustafa, S. Shahzad
    JCR-JOURNAL OF CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2023, 29 (02) : 109 - 111
  • [3] Hypersensitivity Reactions with Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab (Evusheld)
    不详
    MEDICAL LETTER ON DRUGS AND THERAPEUTICS, 2022, 64 (1654): : 112 - 112
  • [4] Increased Dosage of Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab (Evusheld)
    不详
    MEDICAL LETTER ON DRUGS AND THERAPEUTICS, 2022, 64 (1646): : 48 - 48
  • [5] ADVERSE REACTION TO TIXAGEVIMAB AND CILGAVIMAB (EVUSHELD): ANAPHYLAXIS OR NOT?
    Wang, Z.
    Swain, S.
    Kohn, L.
    ANNALS OF ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY, 2022, 129 : S103 - S104
  • [6] Effectiveness of Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab During the BA5 Omicron Period
    Al Jurdi, A.
    Morena, L.
    AlZahrani, N.
    Verhoeff, R.
    Kotton, C. N.
    Riella, L. V.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2023, 23 (06) : S469 - S469
  • [7] Protective measures against Omicron could be more effective than cilgavimab/tixagevimab (Evusheld®) in liver transplant recipients
    Odriozola Herran, Aitor
    Fortea Ormaechea, Jose Ignacio
    Cuadrado Lavin, Antonio
    Puente Sanchez, Angela
    Lazarus, Jeffrey
    Crespo, Javier
    Fabrega, Emilio
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ENFERMEDADES DIGESTIVAS, 2022, 114 (12) : 769 - +
  • [8] Real World Efficacy of COVID-19 Pre-exposure Prophylaxis with tixagevimab/cilgavimab (Evusheld) in People with Multiple Sclerosis
    Tremblay, M. A.
    Elias, L. B.
    Jaber, A. F.
    Manzano, M.
    Leekoff, M.
    Sylvester, A. W.
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2023, 29 : 72 - 73
  • [9] Pre-exposure prophylaxis for COVID-19 with tixagevimab/cilgavimab (evusheld) in patients with multiple myeloma in the omicron SARS-COV-2 era
    Ntanasis-Stathopoulos, Ioannis
    Gavriatopoulou, Maria
    Eleutherakis-Papaiakovou, Evangelos
    Malandrakis, Panagiotis
    Spiliopoulou, Vassiliki
    Syrigou, Rodanthi-Eleni
    Theodorakakou, Foteini
    Fotiou, Despina
    Migkou, Magdalini
    Roussou, Maria
    Kastritis, Efstathios
    Dimopoulos, Meletios
    Terpos, Evangelos
    CLINICAL LYMPHOMA MYELOMA & LEUKEMIA, 2023, 23 : S302 - S303
  • [10] REAL-WORLD EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY OF TIXAGEVIMAB-CILGAVIMAB: A TARGET TRIAL EMULATION STUDY
    Yan, V
    Yang, Y.
    Wan, E. Y. F.
    Yiu, H. H. E.
    Wong, I. C. K.
    Chan, E. W.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2023, 26 (12) : S221 - S221