Empirics vs. art theory: Exploring a factor structure of pictorial expression based on contemporary artworks
被引:0
|
作者:
Schoch, Kerstin
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Appl Sci & Med Univ, MSH Med Sch Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
Univ Appl Sci & Med Univ, IRAT Inst Res Art Therapies, Fac Art Hlth & Social Sci, MSH Med Sch Hamburg, Schellerdamm 22-24, D-21079 Hamburg, GermanyUniv Appl Sci & Med Univ, MSH Med Sch Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
Schoch, Kerstin
[1
,3
]
Ostermann, Thomas
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Witten Herdecke Univ, Witten, GermanyUniv Appl Sci & Med Univ, MSH Med Sch Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
Ostermann, Thomas
[2
]
机构:
[1] Univ Appl Sci & Med Univ, MSH Med Sch Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
[2] Witten Herdecke Univ, Witten, Germany
[3] Univ Appl Sci & Med Univ, IRAT Inst Res Art Therapies, Fac Art Hlth & Social Sci, MSH Med Sch Hamburg, Schellerdamm 22-24, D-21079 Hamburg, Germany
The RizbA scale combines psychometrics and art theory and enables a measurement of pictorial expression. This study explores its factor structure and a potential gap between theory and empirics. A sample of 275 pictorial works by artists and nonprofessionals was rated by 179 art experts. Three CFA path models were specified: models A and B based on the empirical results of previous studies, C on the theory of the initial study. Model C was additionally tested on a combined dataset. A and B did not converge, C was associated with fit indices as follows: RSMEA = .122, CFI = .712, TLI = .679, SRMR = .135, for the combined dataset: RSMEA = .086, CFI = .740, TLI = .696, SRMR = .084. Only model C partly suggests an acceptable fit. The results speak to a methodological gap between empirics and theory, that might be solved by a postdisciplinary measurement model.