New model ensemble reveals how forcing uncertainty and model structure alter climate simulated across CMIP generations of the Community Earth System Model

被引:5
|
作者
Holland, Marika M. [1 ]
Hannay, Cecile [1 ]
Fasullo, John [1 ]
Jahn, Alexandra [2 ,3 ]
Kay, Jennifer E. [2 ,4 ]
Mills, Michael [5 ]
Simpson, Isla R. [1 ]
Wieder, William [1 ]
Lawrence, Peter [1 ]
Kluzek, Erik [1 ]
Bailey, David [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Ctr Atmospher Res, Climate & Global Dynam Lab, Boulder, CO 80305 USA
[2] Univ Colorado, Dept Atmospher & Ocean Sci, Boulder, CO USA
[3] Univ Colorado, Inst Arctic & Alpine Res, Boulder, CO USA
[4] Univ Colorado, Cooperat Inst Res Environm Sci, Boulder, CO USA
[5] Natl Ctr Atmospher Res, Atmospher Chem Observat & Modeling Lab, Boulder, CO USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
BIOMASS BURNING EMISSIONS; VERSION;
D O I
10.5194/gmd-17-1585-2024
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Climate simulation uncertainties arise from internal variability, model structure, and external forcings. Model intercomparisons (such as the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project; CMIP) and single-model large ensembles have provided insight into uncertainty sources. Under the Community Earth System Model (CESM) project, large ensembles have been performed for CESM2 (a CMIP6-era model) and CESM1 (a CMIP5-era model). We refer to these as CESM2-LE and CESM1-LE. The external forcing used in these simulations has changed to be consistent with their CMIP generation. As a result, differences between CESM2-LE and CESM1-LE ensemble means arise from changes in both model structure and forcing. Here we present new ensemble simulations which allow us to separate the influences of these model structural and forcing differences. Our new CESM2 simulations are run with CMIP5 forcings equivalent to those used in the CESM1-LE. We find a strong influence of historical forcing uncertainty due to aerosol effects on simulated climate. For the historical period, forcing drives reduced global warming and ocean heat uptake in CESM2-LE relative to CESM1-LE that is counteracted by the influence of model structure. The influence of the model structure and forcing vary across the globe, and the Arctic exhibits a distinct signal that contrasts with the global mean. For the 21st century, the importance of scenario forcing differences (SSP3-7.0 for CESM2-LE and RCP8.5 for CESM1-LE) is evident. The new simulations presented here allow us to diagnose the influence of model structure on 21st century change, despite large scenario forcing differences, revealing that differences in the meridional distribution of warming are caused by model structure. Feedback analysis reveals that clouds and their impact on shortwave radiation explain many of these structural differences between CESM2 and CESM1. In the Arctic, albedo changes control transient climate evolution differences due to structural differences between CESM2 and CESM1.
引用
收藏
页码:1585 / 1602
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Significant impact of forcing uncertainty in a large ensemble of climate model simulations
    Fyfe, John C.
    Kharin, Viatcheslav V.
    Santer, Benjamin D.
    Cole, Jason N. S.
    Gillett, Nathan P.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2021, 118 (23)
  • [2] Sensitivity of an Earth system climate model to idealized radiative forcing
    Andrews, Timothy
    Ringer, Mark A.
    Doutriaux-Boucher, Marie
    Webb, Mark J.
    Collins, William J.
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2012, 39
  • [3] Climate Forcing and Trends of Organic Aerosols in the Community Earth System Model (CESM2)
    Tilmes, S.
    Hodzic, A.
    Emmons, L. K.
    Mills, M. J.
    Gettelman, A.
    Kinnison, D. E.
    Park, M.
    Lamarque, J. -F.
    Vitt, F.
    Shrivastava, M.
    Campuzano-Jost, P.
    Jimenez, J. L.
    Liu, X.
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS, 2019, 11 (12) : 4323 - 4351
  • [4] COMPARISON OF CLOUD FORCING DERIVED FROM THE EARTH RADIATION BUDGET EXPERIMENT WITH THAT SIMULATED BY THE NCAR COMMUNITY CLIMATE MODEL
    KIEHL, JT
    RAMANATHAN, V
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1990, 95 (D8) : 11679 - 11698
  • [5] Regional Climate Simulations With the Community Earth System Model
    Gettelman, A.
    Callaghan, P.
    Larson, V. E.
    Zarzycki, C. M.
    Bacmeister, J. T.
    Lauritzen, P. H.
    Bogenschutz, P. A.
    Neale, R. B.
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS, 2018, 10 (06): : 1245 - 1265
  • [6] Drivers of Last Millennium Antarctic Climate Evolution in an Ensemble of Community Earth System Model Simulations
    Truax, Olivia J.
    Otto-Bliesner, Bette L.
    Brady, Esther C.
    Stevens, Craig L.
    Wilson, Gary S.
    Riesselman, Christina R.
    GEOSCIENCES, 2022, 12 (08)
  • [7] CLIMATE VARIABILITY AND CHANGE SINCE 850 CE An Ensemble Approach with the Community Earth System Model
    Otto-Bliesner, Bette L.
    Brady, Esther C.
    Fasullo, John
    Jahn, Alexandra
    Landrum, Laura
    Stevenson, Samantha
    Rosenbloom, Nan
    Mai, Andrew
    Strand, Gary
    BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2016, 97 (05) : 735 - 754
  • [8] Low-Frequency North Atlantic Climate Variability in the Community Earth System Model Large Ensemble
    Kim, Who M.
    Yeager, Stephen
    Chang, Ping
    Danabasoglu, Gokhan
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2018, 31 (02) : 787 - 813
  • [9] Spatial Decomposition of Climate Feedbacks in the Community Earth System Model
    Gettelman, A.
    Kay, J. E.
    Fasullo, J. T.
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2013, 26 (11) : 3544 - 3561
  • [10] A new marine ecosystem model for the University of Victoria Earth System Climate Model
    Keller, D. P.
    Oschlies, A.
    Eby, M.
    GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2012, 5 (05) : 1195 - 1220