RT-qPCR is helpful to distinguish the clinicopathological features of HER2 immunohistochemistry 0 and 1+

被引:2
|
作者
Yue, Meng [1 ]
Wu, Si [1 ]
Wang, Xinran [1 ]
Cai, Lijing [1 ]
Wang, Xiaoxiao [1 ]
Yang, Huichai [1 ]
Liu, Yueping [1 ]
机构
[1] Hebei Med Univ, Dept Pathol, Hosp 4, 12 Jiankang Rd, Shijiazhuang 050011, Hebei, Peoples R China
关键词
Breast cancer; HER2-low; Ultra-low; RT-qPCR; mRNA;
D O I
10.1016/j.prp.2023.154532
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
The most commonly applied techniques to assess human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression in breast cancer are immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). HER2 detection by reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) can provide standardized, objective and automated assessment and reflect the HER2 expression continuity. Currently, there is lack of sufficient evidence to validate whether RT-qPCR technique is more appropriate for the detection of HER2 low expression, especially ultra-low expression. Here, we primarily utilized RT-qPCR to differentiate HER2 true negative, ultralow and 1 +, and compare the clinicopathological features and prognosis between RT-qPCR and IHC. 136 breast cancer cases with HER2 0 or 1 + were collected, also included 21 cases with HER2 2 + FISH negative as well as 25 cases with HER2 positive during the same period for comparative analysis. Compared the mRNA levels based on IHC/FISH scores. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was utilized to determine the threshold for reclassification, and the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis differences among IHC true negative, ultra-low and 1 + after re-classification by RT-qPCR were analyzed. The mRNA level significantly differed between the IHC 0 and 1 + groups (p < 0.001). The IHC 0 group was further divided into true negative and ultralow, there was no statistically significant difference in mRNA levels between true negative and ultra-low groups, while the difference between ultra-low and 1 + mRNA levels was statistically significant (p < 0.001). After reclassification of IHC true negative, ultra-low and 1 + by RT-qPCR, there were statistically significant differences in histological grade, ER, PR and TILs expression. There was no significant difference between DFS and OS in the two classification methods. RT-qPCR classification aids in distinguishing clinicopathological characteristics and can serve as a supplementary technique for detecting HER2-low by IHC.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of immunohistochemistry and RT-qPCR for assessing ER, PR, HER2, and Ki67 and evaluating subtypes in patients with breast cancer
    Chen, Lili
    Chen, Yanyang
    Xie, Zhongpeng
    Luo, Jiao
    Wang, Yuefeng
    Zhou, Jianwen
    Huang, Leilei
    Li, Hongxia
    Wang, Linhai
    Liu, Pei
    Shu, Man
    Zhang, Wenhui
    Ke, Zunfu
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2022, 194 (03) : 517 - 529
  • [2] Comparison of immunohistochemistry and RT-qPCR for assessing ER, PR, HER2, and Ki67 and evaluating subtypes in patients with breast cancer
    Lili Chen
    Yanyang Chen
    Zhongpeng Xie
    Jiao Luo
    Yuefeng Wang
    Jianwen Zhou
    Leilei Huang
    Hongxia Li
    Linhai Wang
    Pei Liu
    Man Shu
    Wenhui Zhang
    Zunfu Ke
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2022, 194 : 517 - 529
  • [3] Evaluation of RT-qPCR and luminex-based methodolgies in HER2 breast cancer testing
    Kornaga, Elizabeth N.
    McIntyre, John B.
    Klimowicz, Alexander C.
    Guggisberg, Natalia
    Morris, Don G.
    Magliocco, Anthony M.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2015, 75
  • [4] Comparison of RT-qPCR with consensus immunohistochemistry by three pathologists for ER, PR, HER2 and Ki-67 in Chinese breast cancer patients
    Teng, X.
    Li, X.
    Xu, S.
    Zhang, J.
    Hartmann, K.
    Laible, M.
    Hipfel, R.
    Bai, Y.
    Ba, X.
    Wu, Z.
    Wirtz, R. M.
    Liu, S.
    Ugur, S.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2019, 79 (04)
  • [5] Comparison of ER, PR, HER2 and Ki67 expression by MammaTyper® RT-qPCR and immunohistochemistry (IHC) on needle core biopsies of breast cancer
    Shaaban, A.
    Badr, N.
    Zaakouk, M.
    Kearns, D.
    Kong, A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2022, 175 : S87 - S88
  • [6] Development and evaluation of a novel RT-qPCR based test for the quantification of HER2 gene expression in breast cancer
    El Hadi, Hicham
    Abdellaoui-Maane, Imane
    Kottwitz, Denise
    El Amrani, Manal
    Bouchoutrouch, Nadia
    Qmichou, Zineb
    Karkouri, Mehdi
    ElAttar, Hicham
    Errihani, Hassan
    Fernandez, Pedro L.
    Bakri, Youssef
    Sefrioui, Hassan
    Moumen, Abdeladim
    GENE, 2017, 605 : 114 - 122
  • [7] High concordance of a closed-system, RT-qPCR breast cancer assay for HER2 mRNA, compared to clinically determined immunohistochemistry, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and quantitative immunofluorescence
    Wasserman, Brad E.
    Carvajal-Hausdorf, Daniel E.
    Ho, Kenneth
    Wong, Wendy
    Wu, Natalie
    Chu, Victor C.
    Lai, Edwin W.
    Weidler, Jodi M.
    Bates, Michael
    Neumeister, Veronique
    Rimm, David L.
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2017, 97 (12) : 1521 - 1526
  • [8] Macrodissection prior to closed system RT-qPCR is not necessary for estrogen receptor and HER2 concordance with IHC/FISH in breast cancer
    Gupta, Swati
    Mani, Navin R.
    Carvajal-Hausdorf, Daniel E.
    Bossuyt, Veerle
    Ho, Kenneth
    Weidler, Jodi
    Wong, Wendy
    Rhees, Brian
    Bates, Michael
    Rimm, David L.
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2018, 98 (08) : 1076 - 1083
  • [9] Assessment of the dynamic range and quantitative potential of ER, PR, HER2 and Ki67 gene expression by RT-qPCR
    Gasior, A.
    Gorniak, J.
    Howard, K.
    Harrison, M.
    Gough, L.
    Rollinson, S.
    Pounce, Z.
    Wegscheider, A.
    Niendorf, A.
    VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2024, 485 : S54 - S54
  • [10] Macrodissection prior to closed system RT-qPCR is not necessary for estrogen receptor and HER2 concordance with IHC/FISH in breast cancer
    Gupta, Swati
    Carvajal-Hausdorf, Daniel E.
    Wasserman, Brad E.
    Ho, Kenneth
    Weidler, Jodi
    Wong, Wendy
    Rhees, Brian
    Bates, Michael
    Rimm, David L.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2018, 78 (04)