Obtaining an animal welfare status in Norwegian dairy herds-A mountain to climb

被引:3
|
作者
Barry, Conor [1 ]
Ellingsen-Dalskau, Kristian [2 ]
Garmo, Randi Therese [3 ]
Kischel, StineGronmo [3 ]
Winckler, Christoph [4 ]
Kielland, Camilla [1 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Univ Life Sci, Fac Vet Med, Dept Prod Anim Clin Sci, As, Norway
[2] Norwegian Vet Inst, Dept Anim Hlth Anim Welf & Food Safety, As, Norway
[3] TINE SA, Oslo, Norway
[4] Univ Nat Resources & Life Sci, Inst Livestock Sci, Dept Sustainable Agr Syst, Vienna, Austria
关键词
animal welfare; Welfare Quality((R)); dairy cattle; loose-housed; regional variation; Scandinavia; prevalence; free-stall housing; CATTLE WELFARE; INTEROBSERVER RELIABILITY; ALLERGIC RHINITIS; RISK-FACTORS; LESIONS; ASSOCIATIONS; PREVALENCE; FERTILITY; LAMENESS; HUMANS;
D O I
10.3389/fvets.2023.1125860
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Introduction: Knowing the national status of animal welfare, one can identify welfare problems and set a benchmark against which improvements can be compared. Such a status is potentially invaluable for tangible, sustained animal welfare improvement. The objective of this cross-sectional study was to report the status of animal welfare in Norwegian loose-housed dairy herds as assessed using the Welfare Quality((R)) Assessment Protocol. Additionally, we investigated if the welfare status varied on a regional basis. Methods: In total, 155 herds in eight of Norway's eleven counties were assessed by six trained Welfare Quality((R)) assessors. This article presents the herd prevalences of common welfare issues in dairy production in Norway, as well as integrated welfare scores. To determine whether welfare status varied regionally in Norway, generalized linear modeling was used to estimate the mean welfare score for five regions in the four Welfare Quality((R)) principles: A. Good feeding, B. Good housing, C. Good health, and D. Appropriate behavior. These estimated mean welfare scores and their 95% confidence intervals were subsequently assessed for significant variation. Results: Encouraging findings included the low mean herd prevalence of "very lean' cows (3.0%) and the high proportion of cows (59.8%) which could be touched during avoidance distance testing, indicating a positive relationship between stockpeople and their cattle. Challenges affecting the welfare of Norwegian dairy cows were also identified. Of particular concern were issues related to the cows' environment such as prolonged times needed to complete lying down movements and integument alterations. No herd was completely free of changes to the integument and, on average, 77.9% of each herd were affected either mildly or severely. Animal welfare did not appear to vary much between the five regions assessed. Our investigation revealed significant regional variation between two regions (Trondelag and Vestlandet North) in only the Welfare Quality((R)) principle Good housing (p < 0.01). Discussion: The almost complete absence of regional variation demonstrates that animal welfare status generally varies most at herd level. In conclusion, both welfare challenges and encouraging findings were identified in loose-housed Norwegian dairy herds. To improve animal welfare, herd-specific interventions are most likely to be effective in these herds.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Obtaining an animal welfare status in Norwegian dairy herds-a mountain to climb (vol 10, 1125860, 2023)
    Barry, Conor
    Ellingsen-Dalskau, Kristian
    Garmo, Randi Therese
    Gronmo Kischel, Stine
    Winckler, Christoph
    Kielland, Camilla
    FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2023, 10
  • [2] Cow mortality as an indicator of animal welfare in dairy herds
    Thomsen, Peter T.
    Houe, Hans
    RESEARCH IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2018, 119 : 239 - 243
  • [3] Effectiveness of animal health and welfare planning in dairy herds: a review
    Tremetsberger, L.
    Winckler, C.
    ANIMAL WELFARE, 2015, 24 (01) : 55 - 67
  • [4] Animal welfare assessment benchmarking as a tool for health and welfare planning in organic dairy herds
    Huxley, JN
    Burke, J
    Roderick, S
    Main, DCJ
    Whay, HR
    VETERINARY RECORD, 2004, 155 (08) : 237 - 239
  • [5] Exploring uses for an algorithmically generated Animal Welfare Indicator for welfare assessment of dairy herds
    Barry, Conor
    Ellingsen-Dalskau, Kristian
    Winckler, Christoph
    Kielland, Camilla
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2024, 107 (06) : 3941 - 3958
  • [6] Methods for assessing animal welfare in dairy cattle herds. Literature review
    Jurkovich Viktor
    Foris Borbala
    Vegh Akos
    MAGYAR ALLATORVOSOK LAPJA, 2012, 134 (07) : 442 - 448
  • [7] Comparison of animal welfare indices in dairy herds based on different sources of data
    Otten, N. D.
    Rousing, T.
    Houe, H.
    Thomsen, P. T.
    Sorensen, J. T.
    ANIMAL WELFARE, 2016, 25 (02) : 207 - 215
  • [8] Register-based predictors of violations of animal welfare legislation in dairy herds
    Otten, N. D.
    Nielsen, L. R.
    Thomsen, P. T.
    Houe, H.
    ANIMAL, 2014, 8 (12) : 1963 - 1970
  • [9] A comparison of three animal welfare assessment protocols applied to Swedish dairy cow herds
    Larsson, B. Staaf
    Jansson, A.
    Holmberg, M.
    von Walter, L. Winblad
    Steen, M.
    Dahlborn, K.
    ACTA AGRICULTURAE SCANDINAVICA SECTION A-ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2024, 73 (3-4): : 153 - 164
  • [10] Welfare Assessment in Tunisian Dairy Herds by Animal-Linked Parameters and Performance Efficiency
    Mhamdi, M.
    Darej, C.
    Bouallegue, M.
    Brar, S. Kaur
    Ben Hamouda, M.
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2013, 3 (02): : 387 - 395