Towards a global sustainable development agenda built on social-ecological resilience

被引:11
|
作者
Scown, Murray W. [1 ]
Craig, Robin K. [2 ]
Allen, Craig R. [3 ]
Gunderson, Lance [4 ]
Angeler, David G. [5 ,6 ,7 ,8 ]
Garcia, Jorge H. [9 ]
Garmestani, Ahjond [10 ,11 ]
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Lund Univ Ctr Sustainabil Studies LUCSUS, Lund, Sweden
[2] Univ Southern Calif, Gould Sch Law, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] Univ Nebraska Lincoln, Ctr Resilience Agr Working Landscapes, Sch Nat Resources, Lincoln, NE USA
[4] Emory Univ, Dept Environm Sci, Atlanta, GA USA
[5] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Aquat Sci & Assessment, Uppsala, Sweden
[6] Univ Nebraska Lincoln, Sch Nat Resources, Lincoln, NE USA
[7] Brain Capital Alliance, San Francisco, CA USA
[8] Deakin Univ, Inst Mental & Phys Hlth & Clin Translat, IMPACT, Geelong, Vic, Australia
[9] Univ Los Andes, Sch Management, Bogota, Colombia
[10] US EPA, Off Res & Dev, Gulf Breeze, FL USA
[11] Univ Utrecht, Utrecht Ctr Water Oceans & Sustainabil Law, Utrecht, Netherlands
来源
GLOBAL SUSTAINABILITY | 2023年 / 6卷
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
earth systems (land; water; and atmospheric); ecology and biodiversity; natural resources (biological and non-biological); policies; politics and governance; DEVELOPMENT GOALS; KNOWLEDGE; POLITICS;
D O I
10.1017/sus.2023.8
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Non-technical summaryThe United Nations' sustainable development goals (SDGs) articulate societal aspirations for people and our planet. Many scientists have criticised the SDGs and some have suggested that a better understanding of the complex interactions between society and the environment should underpin the next global development agenda. We further this discussion through the theory of social-ecological resilience, which emphasises the ability of systems to absorb, adapt, and transform in the face of change. We determine the strengths of the current SDGs, which should form a basis for the next agenda, and identify key gaps that should be filled. Technical summaryThe United Nations' sustainable development goals (SDGs) are past their halfway point and the next global development agenda will soon need to be developed. While laudable, the SDGs have received strong criticism from many, and scholars have proposed that adopting complex adaptive or social-ecological system approaches would increase the effectiveness of the agenda. Here we dive deeper into these discussions to explore how the theory of social-ecological resilience could serve as a strong foundation for the next global sustainable development agenda. We identify the strengths and weaknesses of the current SDGs by determining which of the 169 targets address each of 43 factors affecting social-ecological resilience that we have compiled from the literature. The SDGs with the strongest connections to social-ecological resilience are the environment-focus goals (SDGs 2, 6, 13, 14, 15), which are also the goals consistently under-prioritised in the implementation of the current agenda. In terms of the 43 factors affecting social-ecological resilience, the SDG strengths lie in their communication, inclusive decision making, financial support, regulatory incentives, economic diversity, and transparency in governance and law. On the contrary, ecological factors of resilience are seriously lacking in the SDGs, particularly with regards to scale, cross-scale interactions, and non-stationarity. Social media summaryThe post-2030 agenda should build on strengths of SDGs 2, 6, 13, 14, 15, and fill gaps in scale, variability, and feedbacks.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Articulating a social-ecological resilience agenda for urban design
    Quigley, Mura
    Blair, Neale
    Davison, Karen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF URBAN DESIGN, 2018, 23 (04) : 581 - 602
  • [2] Global targets that reveal the social-ecological interdependencies of sustainable development
    Reyers, Belinda
    Selig, Elizabeth R.
    [J]. NATURE ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2020, 4 (08) : 1011 - 1019
  • [3] Towards a social-ecological resilience framework for coastal planning
    Lloyd, Michael Greg
    Peel, Deborah
    Duck, Robert W.
    [J]. LAND USE POLICY, 2013, 30 (01) : 925 - 933
  • [4] Enhancing the social-ecological resilience of an urban lake for sustainable management
    Sheergojri, Ishfaq Ahmad
    Rashid, Irfan
    Aneaus, Shiekh
    Rashid, Irfan
    Qureshi, Aijaz Ahmad
    Rehman, Ishfaq ul
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2023,
  • [5] Social-Ecological Resilience and Sustainable Agriculture Under Water Scarcity
    Maleksaeidi, Hamideh
    Karami, Ezatollah
    [J]. AGROECOLOGY AND SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS, 2013, 37 (03) : 262 - 290
  • [6] Towards a bridging concept for undesirable resilience in social-ecological systems
    Dornelles, Andre Z.
    Boyd, Emily
    Nunes, Richard J.
    Asquith, Mike
    Boonstra, Wiebren J.
    Delabre, Izabela
    Denney, J. Michael
    Grimm, Volker
    Jentsch, Anke
    Nicholas, Kimberly A.
    Schroter, Matthias
    Seppelt, Ralf
    Settele, Josef
    Shackelford, Nancy
    Standish, Rachel J.
    Yengoh, Genesis Tambang
    Oliver, Tom H.
    [J]. GLOBAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 3
  • [7] Governance innovations in the coastal zone: Towards social-ecological resilience
    Elrick-Barr, Carmen E.
    Thomsen, Dana C.
    Smith, Timothy F.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2024, 153
  • [8] Actors’ diversity and the resilience of social-ecological systems to global change
    Grêt-Regamey A.
    Huber S.H.
    Huber R.
    [J]. Nature Sustainability, 2019, 2 (04) : 290 - 297
  • [9] The Politics of Social-ecological Resilience and Sustainable Socio-technical Transitions
    Smith, Adrian
    Stirling, Andy
    [J]. ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2010, 15 (01):
  • [10] Social learning for resilience in social-ecological systems
    de Kraker, Joop
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 28 : 100 - 107