Outcomes of standard EVAR for juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm in patients unsuitable for fenestrated EVAR and open repair

被引:0
|
作者
Wang, Mingshan [1 ]
Liu, Zhen [2 ]
Cai, Huoying [1 ]
Wang, Jinsong [3 ]
Zhou, Yu [1 ,5 ]
Hu, Zuojun [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Vasc Surg, Natl Guangdong Joint Engn Lab Diag & Treatment Vas, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Gansu Prov Hosp, Dept Vasc Surg, Lanzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Guangdong Prov Peoples Hosp, Dept Vasc & Plast Surg, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Vasc Surg, Natl Guangdong Joint Engn Lab Diag & Treatment Vas, 58 Zhongshan 2nd Rd, Guangzhou 510080, Peoples R China
[5] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Vasc Surg, Natl Guangdong Joint Engn Lab Diag & Treatment Vas, 58 Zhongshan 2nd Rd, Guangzhou 510080, Peoples R China
关键词
Abdominal aortic aneurysm; endoleak; standard endovascular aneurysm repair; postoperative complications; treatment outcome; SHORT PROXIMAL NECKS; ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT; CHIMNEY; METAANALYSIS; BRANCHES; LENGTH;
D O I
10.1177/17085381241243181
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Objective To evaluate the long-term outcomes of standard endovascular aneurysm repair (S-EVAR) of juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (JAAAs). Methods Data of patients with JAAAs who were unsuitable for fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (F-EVAR) and open repair (OR) and underwent treatment from January 2015 to December 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Computed tomography angiography and ultrasonography of the aorta were performed before discharge, at 6 and 12 months postoperatively, and annually thereafter. The main outcome measures were mortality, type Ia endoleaks, and reintervention. Results A total of 62 patients (mean age, 72.1 +/- 7.3 years) underwent S-EVAR. The mean aneurysm length and diameter and the proximal neck length and diameter were 110.4 +/- 30.9 mm, 57.2 +/- 15.9 mm, 8.09 +/- 0.97 mm, and 26.05 +/- 0.49 mm, respectively. The mean suprarenal and infrarenal aortic angles were 162.9 +/- 26 degrees and 144.1 +/- 31 degrees, respectively. The mean follow-up duration was 40.6 +/- 23.4 months and the 5-year survival rate was 62.2%. Six (9.8%) patients experienced type Ia endoleaks, of whom three underwent endovascular repair at 12, 18, and 24 months, one underwent conversion to OR for AAA rupture at 7 days and died, two had minor endoleaks and were kept under observation, and one declined reintervention at 36 months. The 5-year freedom from reintervention rate was 84.4%. The aneurysm diameter shrank in 50 cases (81%), remained stable in 5 cases (8%), and increased in 7 cases (11.3%). A suprarenal aortic angle <114 degrees was associated with type Ia endoleak (p = .005). Conclusions In patients unsuitable for F-EVAR and OR and with a suprarenal aortic angle >114 degrees, the use of S-EVAR for JAAAs can be considered safe and effective. In this study, early and long-term postoperative outcomes demonstrated that S-EVAR achieved satisfactory results in the prevention of aneurysm rupture and associated mortality.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Open repair versus EVAR with parallel grafts in patients with juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm excluded from fenestrated endografting
    Menegolo, Mirko
    Xodo, Andrea
    Penzo, Marco
    Piazza, Michele
    Squizzato, Francesco
    Colacchio, Elda C.
    Grego, Franco
    Antonello, Michele
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2021, 62 (05): : 483 - 495
  • [2] Fenestrated EVAR for juxtarenal aortic aneurysms
    Stana, J.
    Fernandez Prendes, C.
    Konstantinou, N.
    Rantner, B.
    Banafsche, R.
    Tsilimparis, N.
    GEFASSCHIRURGIE, 2020, 25 (06): : 475 - 484
  • [3] Ruptured Juxtarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Treated With a Fenestrated EVAR Graft Intended for a Different Patient
    Al-Jundi, Wissam
    Elboushi, Amro
    Lees, Tim
    Williams, Robin
    VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2016, 50 (06) : 427 - 430
  • [4] A Case of Successful EVAR with Snorkel Technique for Juxtarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
    Okuno, Keisuke
    Iida, Osamu
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 63 (12) : S196 - S196
  • [5] Comparison of the quality of life of patients with endovascular (EVAR) and open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair
    Pierrakos, G.
    Pateras, I.
    Tzilalis, V.
    Lazarides, M.
    Simopoulos, C.
    Dayantas, J.
    Katsikas, V.
    Sarris, M.
    Yfantopoulos, J.
    ARCHIVES OF HELLENIC MEDICINE, 2010, 27 (06): : 918 - 923
  • [6] Outcomes of Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair (EVAR) in High-Risk Patients
    Lim, Sungho
    Halandras, Pegge M.
    Lee, Youngeun
    Park, Taeyoung
    Crisostomo, Paul
    Hershberger, Richard C.
    Aulivola, Bernadette
    Cho, Jae S.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2014, 60 (04) : 1106 - 1106
  • [7] Fenestrated endovascular aortic repair for juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm
    Guo Wei
    Zhang Hong-peng
    Liu Xiao-ping
    Jia Xin
    Xiong Jiang
    Ma Xiao-hui
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 126 (03) : 409 - 414
  • [8] Mortality for Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair before and after Endovascular Aortic Repair (EVAR)
    Ammar, Alex D.
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2019, 85 (12) : 1341 - 1344
  • [9] Fenestrated endovascular aortic repair for juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm
    GUO Wei
    ZHANG Hong-peng
    LIU Xiao-ping
    JIA Xin
    XIONG Jiang
    MA Xiao-hui
    中华医学杂志(英文版), 2013, 126 (03) : 409 - 414
  • [10] Outcomes of Endovascular Aneurysm Repair (EVAR) Compared to Open Repair in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: An Umbrella Meta-Analysis
    Cherian, Amrita M.
    Venu, Rakshaya
    Raja, Pavithra Ishita
    Saravanan, Sabanantham
    Khan, Usman
    Kantawala, Rahul
    Tasnim, Soubarno
    Bose, Naveen J.
    Kumar, Rajanikant
    Clementina, Ruchira
    Sabu, Nagma
    Syed, Saifullah
    Cherukuri, Anjani Mahesh Kumar
    Chaudhry, Aizaz R.
    Lakhani, Alisha
    Sharma, Avinash
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (06)