Context, Process, and Participant Response in the Implementation of Family Support Programmes in Spain

被引:0
|
作者
Byrne, Sonia [1 ]
Lopez-Larrosa, Silvia [2 ]
Martin, Juan C. [3 ]
Callejas, Enrique [1 ]
Maiquez, Maria L. [1 ]
Rodrigo, Maria J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Laguna, Tenerife, Spain
[2] Univ A Coruna, Coruna, Spain
[3] Univ Palmas Gran Canaria, Gran Canaria, Spain
来源
PSICOLOGIA EDUCATIVA | 2023年 / 29卷 / 01期
关键词
Evidence-based programmes; Implementation components; Programme impact; Quality standards; Positive parenting; POSITIVE PARENTING PROGRAMS; QUALITY; HOME; MALTREATMENT; PREVENTION; COMPONENTS; SELECTION; CRITERIA; NUMBER; RISK;
D O I
10.5093/psed2022a8
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Implementation research addresses how well a programme is conducted when applied in real-world conditions. However, research based on quality standards is still scarce as it requires monitoring context, process, and participant response. This study applies implementation quality standards to 57 Spanish parenting and family support programmes identified in the COST European Family Support Network project, using an ten-component evaluation sheet sheet. Descriptive analyses showed a good implementation level. The latent profile analysis identified four patterns defined by programme setting: profile 1, Social Services/NGO setting (21.1%), profile 2, Health setting (31.6%), profile 3, Multi-setting (14%), and profile 4, Educational setting (33.3%), differing in professional discipline, training, participant response, and professional perception of implementation. Profile memberships were related to programme outcomes, scaling up, and sustainability. Findings illustrate conceptual and practical challenges that researchers and professionals usually encounter during implementation, and the efforts required to deliver programmes effectively in real-world settings in Spain.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 33
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Professionals' understanding of partnership with parents in the context of family support programmes
    van Houte, Sabine
    Bradt, Lieve
    Vandenbroeck, Michel
    Bouverne-De Bie, Maria
    CHILD & FAMILY SOCIAL WORK, 2015, 20 (01) : 116 - 124
  • [2] Evidence-based Standards in the Design of Family Support Programmes in Spain
    Bernedo, Isabel M. M.
    Balsells, M. Angels
    Gonzalez-Pasarin, Lucia
    Espinosa, M. Angeles
    PSICOLOGIA EDUCATIVA, 2023, 29 (01): : 15 - 23
  • [3] The Evaluation of Family Support Programmes in Spain. An Analysis of their Quality Standards
    Hidalgo, Victoria
    Rodriguez-Ruiz, Beatriz
    Bacete, Francisco J. Garcia
    Martinez-Gonzalez, Raquel A.
    Lopez-Verdugo, Isabel
    Jimenez, Lucia
    PSICOLOGIA EDUCATIVA, 2023, 29 (01): : 35 - 43
  • [4] Development and Implementation of Intergenerational Programmes in the European Context: Spain, Scotland, and the United Kingdom
    Fernandez Portero, Cristina
    JOURNAL OF INTERGENERATIONAL RELATIONSHIPS, 2012, 10 (02) : 190 - 194
  • [5] Family caregiver support programmes
    不详
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2005, 50 (03) : 336 - 336
  • [6] ACTIVE SUPPORT IN A SWEDISH CONTEXT-PERSPECTIVES ON THE IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS
    Ingemarson, M.
    JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH, 2024, 68 (07) : 712 - 712
  • [7] Voluntary return programmes in Bolivia and Spain in the context of crisis
    Parella Rubio, Sonia
    Petroff, Alisa
    Serradell Pumareda, Olga
    REVISTA CIDOB D AFERS INTERNATIONALS, 2014, (106-107): : 171 - 192
  • [8] Policy success: What is the role of implementation support programmes?
    Peckham, Stephen
    Hudson, Bob
    Hunter, David
    Redgate, Sam
    SOCIAL POLICY & ADMINISTRATION, 2022, 56 (03) : 378 - 393
  • [9] Parent- and Family-Focused Support in Portugal: Context and Analysis of Services/Programmes from an Equity Perspective
    Gil Nata
    Joana Cadima
    Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 2019, 36 : 269 - 283
  • [10] Parent- and Family-Focused Support in Portugal: Context and Analysis of Services/Programmes from an Equity Perspective
    Nata, Gil
    Cadima, Joana
    CHILD AND ADOLESCENT SOCIAL WORK JOURNAL, 2019, 36 (03) : 269 - 283